IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v6y2024i1p98-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Tutoring Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sehrish Abrejo

    (Department of Computer Science, Isra University, Hyderabad. Pakistan)

Abstract

Introduction/Importance of Study:Collaborative tutoring systems (CTSs) allow students to communicate from different geographical areas to learn, share,and explain ideas related to a particular problem.Novelty statement:Many CTSs employ peer tutor evaluation to offer feedback to students as theysolve scenarios. When they receive similar questions, the studentsutilizethe feedback to enhance their thinking. The accuracy of peer feedback is important because it helps students to enhance their learning skills. If the student serving as a peer tutor is unfamiliar with the topic, he or she may suggest incorrect feedback. Considering peer feedback’s importance in learning systems, this study's primary goal is to critically examine various collaborative tutoring systems and evaluate the strategies they have created to enhance group learning. Numerous reviews have been published in the past, but none of them have taken into account the methods by which these systems deliver or assess peer feedback.Material and Method:This article critically reviews different CTSs based on the proposed evaluation scheme to investigate their design and methods that support peer collaboration.Result and Discussion:Through this study, it was found that there are few attempts in which the feedback sent from one student to another student is evaluated by CTS. The peer feedback accuracy is important, because a student who gets inaccurate feedback may reach the wrong conclusions, which would affect the learner's knowledge.Concluding Remarks:It is concluded that all of the CTSs provide chances to boost student's learning gains. Fortunately, the entire degree to which these advantages can be realized is subject to further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehrish Abrejo, 2024. "Review of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Tutoring Systems," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 6(1), pages 98-114, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:98-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/644/1276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/644
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:98-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.