IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijist1/v4y2022i5p157-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usability Evaluation of Facebook and Instagram by Visually Impaired People

Author

Listed:
  • Amna Sajid

    (Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, National University of Modern Languages)

Abstract

Introduction/Importance of Study:Social networking websites have become the main medium for communication, information sharing, entertainment, buying/selling, and various other purposes. People of every age use social networking websites,and their usage is increasing daily,especially in current circumstances. People with different abilities also used social networking websites, but each set of users had their requirements forusing these websites. Visually impaired people use computers and the web with the help of screen reading tools e. g.; jaws, and NVDA. Screen reading tools read a web page sequentially, which wasa time-consumingprocess. The major problem with screen reading tools came while reading visual content. Screen reading tools only read the alternate texts of non-visual content behind their tag. This researchfocuses on the usability of social networking websitesfor visually impaired people. Two of the most commonly used social networking websites,Facebook and Instagram,were selected for the usability evaluation. Accessibility, efficiency, and effectiveness were the metrics of usability, which were evaluated in thisstudy.Novelty statement:A consolidatedset of guidelines specific to social networking websites were presented in which some new guidelines were also proposed for Facebook. A mock interface was developed based on the proposed guidelines for Facebook.Material and Method:`For the evaluation of usability, a controlled experiment was conducted with 28 visually impaired people in which 16 participants evaluated Facebook and 12 evaluated Instagram to find the usability problems faced by visually impaired people.Result and Discussion:Results showthat Instagram was as easy to use ascomparedto Facebook when used by visually impaired people with the help of screen reading tools. Concluding Remarks:Results showed that Facebook was difficult to use in comparison to Instagram. Thus, new guidelines were proposed for Facebook,and based on the guidelines,a prototype was proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Amna Sajid, 2022. "Usability Evaluation of Facebook and Instagram by Visually Impaired People," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 4(5), pages 157-171, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:4:y:2022:i:5:p:157-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/326/712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/IJIST/article/view/326
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijist1:v:4:y:2022:i:5:p:157-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.