IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v30y2026i3p63-88.html

Free Cash Flow as a Moderator Between Board Characteristics and Dividend Policy: Evidence from Jordan’s Industrial Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Nassar

    (College of Business, Accounting and MIS Department, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait)

  • Yousef Abu Siam

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan)

  • Mohammad Haroun Sharairi

    (College of Business, Accounting Department, Al Ain University)

  • Khalil Nimer

    (College of Business, Accounting and MIS Department, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait)

Abstract

[Purpose] This study investigates the relationship between board characteristics and dividend policy in the context of emerging markets, where agency problems and governance effectiveness remain critical concerns. Although prior research has investigated the direct effects of board attributes on dividend policy, the moderating influence of firms’ internal financial resources, notably free cash flow, remains underexplored.[ Design/Methodology/Approach] Using panel data from industrial firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange over the period 2016–2020, this study employs panel regression techniques to examine the effects of board independence, board size, and board meeting frequency on dividend payouts, while explicitly modeling free cash flow as a moderating variable. [Findings] The empirical findings indicate that board independence and board size are positively and significantly associated with dividend payouts, whereas board meeting frequency does not exhibit a significant direct effect. Furthermore, interaction analysis indicates that higher free cash flow significantly amplifies the effect of board independence and size on dividend policy, implying that governance mechanisms are more effective in guiding dividend decisions under greater internal liquidity. [Practical Implications] The findings offer practical implications for policymakers, investors, and corporate directors. The study recommends enhanced transparency in free cash flow reporting and improved governance guidelines to strengthen dividend decision-making in developing economies. [Originality/Value] This research introduces an interaction-based framework that evaluates how board characteristics and free cash flow jointly influence dividend decisions. This originality provides a new explanation for why previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the impact of board structure on dividend policy. This study is directly related to Decision Sciences because it examines how corporate boards and managers make strategic financial decisions under varying levels of free cash flow, highlighting the governance mechanisms that shape dividend decision-making in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Nassar & Yousef Abu Siam & Mohammad Haroun Sharairi & Khalil Nimer, 2026. "Free Cash Flow as a Moderator Between Board Characteristics and Dividend Policy: Evidence from Jordan’s Industrial Sector," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 30(3), pages 63-88, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:63-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/free-cash-flow-as-a-moderator-between-board-characteristics-and-dividend-policy-evidence-from-jordans-industrial-sector/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iads.site/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Free-Cash-Flow-as-a-Moderator-Between-Board-Characteristics-and-Dividend-Policy-Evidence-from-Jordans-Industrial-Sector.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nieves Carrera & Tashfeen Sohail & Salvador Carmona, 2017. "Audit committees’ social capital and financial reporting quality," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 633-672, September.
    2. Yushan Cheng & Yongchang Hui & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2021. "Spurious Relationships for Nearly Non-Stationary Series," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Badolato, Patrick G. & Donelson, Dain C. & Ege, Matthew, 2014. "Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 208-230.
    4. Denis, David J. & Osobov, Igor, 2008. "Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 62-82, July.
    5. Hui, Yongchang & Wong, Wing-Keung & Bai, Zhidong & Zhu, Zhenzhen, 2016. "A New Nonlinearity Test to Circumvent the Limitation of Volterra Expansion with Applications," MPRA Paper 75216, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:02686900710772591 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wing-Keung Wong & Minh Tam Pham, 2025. "Could the Correlation of A Stationary Series With A Non-Stationary Series Obtain Meaningful Outcomes?," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Wing-Keung Wong & Mu Yue, 2024. "Could Regressing a Stationary Series on a Non-Stationary Series Obtain Meaningful Outcomes?," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    10. Shireenjit Johl & Christine A. Jubb & Keith A. Houghton, 2007. "Earnings management and the audit opinion: evidence from Malaysia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(7), pages 688-715, July.
    11. Nandini Chandar & Hsihui Chang & Xiaochuan Zheng, 2012. "Does overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees improve a firm's financial reporting quality?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 141-165, May.
    12. Abdalwali Lutfi & Saleh Zaid Alkilani & Mohamed Saad & Malek Hamed Alshirah & Ahmad Farhan Alshirah & Mahmaod Alrawad & Malak Akif Al-Khasawneh & Nahla Ibrahim & Abeer Abdelhalim & Mujtaba Hashim Rama, 2022. "The Influence of Audit Committee Chair Characteristics on Financial Reporting Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, November.
    13. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-12-2020-0243 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Nandini Chandar & Hsihui Chang & Xiaochuan Zheng, 2012. "Does overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees improve a firm's financial reporting quality?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 141-165, May.
    15. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    16. Kothari, S.P. & Leone, Andrew J. & Wasley, Charles E., 2005. "Performance matched discretionary accrual measures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 163-197, February.
    17. Chen, Jie & Leung, Woon Sau & Goergen, Marc, 2017. "The impact of board gender composition on dividend payouts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 86-105.
    18. Habiba Al-Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2021. "Audit committee disclosure tone and earnings management," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(5), pages 780-799, May.
    19. Aivazian, Varouj & Booth, Laurence & Cleary, Sean, 2003. "Dividend policy and the organization of capital markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 101-121, April.
    20. Nandini Chandar & Hsihui Chang & Xiaochuan Zheng, 2012. "Does overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees improve a firm's financial reporting quality?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 141-165, May.
    21. Ghafran, Chaudhry & O'Sullivan, Noel, 2017. "The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 578-593.
    22. Jones, Jj, 1991. "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 193-228.
    23. Shireenjit Johl & Christine A. Jubb & Keith A. Houghton, 2007. "Earnings management and the audit opinion: evidence from Malaysia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(7), pages 688-715, July.
    24. Qasim Ahmad Alawaqleh & Nashat Ali Almasria, 2021. "The Impact of Audit Committee Performance and Composition on Financial Reporting Quality in Jordan," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 55-69, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boone, Jeff & Hao, Jie & Linthicum, Cheryl & Pham, Viet, 2024. "Impression management strategy — The relationship between accounting narrative thematic bias and financial graph distortion," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    2. Federico Bertacchini & Alessandro Giovanni Grasso & Ennio Lugli & Ivan Russo, 2025. "Minibond and earnings management: leveraging the signaling effect of minibond listing," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1381-1410, May.
    3. Luminita Enache & Antonio Parbonetti & Anup Srivastava, 2020. "Are all outside directors created equal with respect to firm disclosure policy?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 541-577, August.
    4. Elisabete F. Simões Vieira, 2016. "Earnings Management in Public Family Firms under Economic Adversity," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 190-207, June.
    5. Kalyani Mulchandani & Ketan Mulchandani, 2022. "Does institutional ownership limit classification shifting: evidence from Indian firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 466-477, December.
    6. Thi Giang Tan Tran & Quoc Thuan Pham & Thi Thu Phuong Tran & Thi Thao Hien Bui, 2025. "The Impact of Audit Firm Size on Audit Quality - An Empirical Study of The Vietnamese Stock Market," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
    7. Wael Almaqoushi & Ronan Powell, 2021. "Audit committee quality indices, reporting quality and firm value," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 185-229, January.
    8. Chia-Ling Chao & Shwu-Min Horng, 2013. "Asset write-offs discretion and accruals management in Taiwan: the role of corporate governance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-74, January.
    9. Shahanif Hasan & Aza Azlina Md. Kassim & Mohamad Ali Abdul Hamid, 2020. "The Impact of Audit Quality, Audit Committee and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 272-281.
    10. Chyz, James A. & Eulerich, Marc & Fligge, Benjamin & Romney, Miles A., 2023. "Codetermination and aggressive reporting: Audit committee employee representation, tax aggressiveness, and earnings management," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Bilal & Francisca Ezeani & Muhammad Usman & Bushra Komal & Ali Meftah Gerged, 2025. "Impact of ownership structure and cross‐listing on the role of female audit committee financial experts in mitigating earnings management," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1171-1187, October.
    12. Ahsan Habib & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2016. "Overlapping Membership on Audit and Compensation Committees and Financial Reporting Quality," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 76-90, March.
    13. Zalata, Alaa Mansour & Tauringana, Venancio & Tingbani, Ishmael, 2018. "Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 170-183.
    14. Sandeep Goel & Nimisha Kapoor, 2022. "Is earnings management related to board independence and gender diversity? Sector-wise evidence from India," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 363-373, December.
    15. Osamah Alorayni & Ahmad Riyed Alazzam & Marwan Altarawneh & Hussein Alwreikat, 2026. "Board Characteristics, Audit Committees, and Earnings Manipulation: Examining the Moderating Influence of CEO Power in Jordan's Capital Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 152-174.
    16. Chanchal Chatterjee, 2020. "Board Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(5), pages 1302-1324, October.
    17. La Ode Saidi, 2025. "The Effects of Crude Oil Prices, Exchange Rates, and Inflation on the Level of Investment in Indonesia," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 28(3), pages 106-126.
    18. Geetanjali Pinto & Shailesh Rastogi & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya, 2022. "Does Ownership Structure Influence Dividend Distribution Policy in India? Evidence Using Panel Data Analysis," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 15(2), pages 197-222, December.
    19. Ding, Bin Yan & Wei, Feng, 2023. "Overlapping membership between risk management committee and audit committee and bank risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Mohamed Elsayed Abdelsalam Ghanem & Asma Salman & Muthanna G. Abdul Razzaq & Safaa Sayed Mahmoud & Mohammed Abdul Imran Khan, 2026. "The Role of AI Tools in Enhancing Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Developing Countries," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 30(1), pages 336-376, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:63-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.