IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/aea/jecper/v11y1997i4p127-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Frontier of Telecommunications Deregulation: Small Countries Leading the Pack

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Evans, Lewis, 1998. "The Critical Importance of Information: Incentive Regulation and its Application in Electricity," Working Paper Series 19034, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  2. Alger, Dan & Leung, Joanne, 1999. "The Relative Costs of Local Telephony Across Five Countries," Working Paper Series 3930, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  3. Avila, Luz Angelica Pirir & Lee, Deok-Joo & Kim, Taegu, 2018. "Diffusion and competitive relationship of mobile telephone service in Guatemala: An empirical analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 116-126.
  4. Massey, Patrick, 2004. "Is Irish Utility Regulation Failing Consumers?," Quarterly Economic Commentary: Special Articles, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), vol. 2004(4-Winter), pages 1-18.
  5. Sang-Yong Tom Lee & Xiao Jia Guo, 2004. "Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and Spillover: A Panel Analysis," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 722, Econometric Society.
  6. Mark Armstrong & David E.M. Sappington, 2006. "Regulation, Competition and Liberalization," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 325-366, June.
  7. Pablo Serra & Ronald Fischer, 2000. "Regulating the Electricity Sector in Latin America," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2000), pages 155-218, August.
  8. Madden, Gary & Savage, Scott J., 2000. "R&D spillovers, information technology and telecommunications, and productivity in ASIA and the OECD," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 367-392, December.
  9. Kahn, Alfred E. & Tardiff, Timothy J. & Weisman, Dennis L., 1999. "The Telecommunications Act at three years: an economic evaluation of its implementation by the Federal Communications Commission," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 319-365, December.
  10. Quigley, Neil & Evans, Lewis, 1998. "Common Elements in the Governance of Deregulated Electricity Markets, Telecommunications Market and Payment Systems," Working Paper Series 19037, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  11. Ronald Fischer & Pablo Serra, 2002. "Evaluación de la Regulación de las Telecomunicaciones en Chile (Evaluation of Telecommunications Regulations in Chile)," Documentos de Trabajo 140, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
  12. Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "Strategic Interaction Under Asymmetric Regulation: the 'Kiwi Share' in New Zealand Telecommunications," Working Paper Series 4016, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  13. Toivanen, Otto, 2004. "Choosing Standards," Discussion Papers 937, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
  14. Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "From Competition to Regulation: New Zealand Telecommunications Sector Performance 1987-2007," Working Paper Series 19104, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  15. Bonardi, Jean-Philippe, 2008. "The internal limits to firms' nonmarket activities," MPRA Paper 14500, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  16. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19104 is not listed on IDEAS
  17. Paweł Dziewulski, 2008. "Konkurencja na rynku telekomunikacyjnym przy asymetrycznym dostępie do infrastruktury," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 47-69.
  18. Howell, Bronwyn, 2007. "A Pendulous Progression: New Zealand's Telecommunications Regulation 1987-2007," Working Paper Series 19074, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  19. Barry Keating, 2002. "Policy guidelines for providing telecommunication access in developing economies," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 55-68, January.
  20. Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "Strategic Interaction Under Asymmetric Regulation: the 'Kiwi Share' in New Zealand Telecommunications," Working Paper Series 19117, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  21. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19034 is not listed on IDEAS
  22. Quigley, Neil & Evans, Lewis, 1998. "Common Elements in the Governance of Deregulated Electricity Markets, Telecommunications Market and Payment Systems," Working Paper Series 3938, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  23. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19102 is not listed on IDEAS
  24. Diaz-Bautista, Alejandro, 2002. "The role of telecommunications infrastructure and human capital: Mexico´s economic growth and convergence," ERSA conference papers ersa02p102, European Regional Science Association.
  25. Howell, Bronwyn, 2007. "A Pendulous Progression: New Zealand's Telecommunications Regulation 1987-2007," Working Paper Series 3974, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  26. Russell Pittman, 2001. "Vertical Restructuring of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition Economies," Industrial Organization 0111002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  27. White, Lawrence J., 2000. "US telephone deregulation: lessons to be learned, mistakes to be avoided," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 173-183, May.
  28. Francesc Trillas & Miguel A. Montoya, 2011. "The Liberalization of Infrastructures in Latin America," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  29. Russell Pittman, 2003. "Vertical Restructuring (or Not) of the Infrastructure Sectors of Transition Economies," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 5-26, March.
  30. Zheng, Shilin & Ward, Michael R., 2011. "The effects of market liberalization and privatization on Chinese telecommunications," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 210-220, June.
  31. Manisha Sangekar & Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "Telecommunications Market Evolution in Finland and New Zealand: Unbundling the Differences," Working Paper Series 19102, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  32. Patrice Muller, 2002. "Internet Use in Transition Economies: Economic and Institutional Determinants," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-95, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  33. Carlos Diaz & Raimundo Soto, "undated". "Open-Access Issues in the Chilean Telecommunications and Electricity Sectors," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv124, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
  34. Wang, Chang & Guo, Yue & Yang, Yu & Chen, Shiyi, 2022. "The environmental benefits of electricity industry restructuring in China: Ownership mixing vs. vertical unbundling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
  35. John Quiggin, 1998. "The Premature Burial of Natural Monopoly: Telecommunications Reform in Australia," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 5(4), pages 427-440.
  36. Yuqing Xing, 2001. "Assessing the Significance of Telecommunication Deregulation on the Growth of Japan's Mobile Phone Market," Working Papers EMS_2001_02, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
  37. Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "From Competition to Regulation: New Zealand Telecommunications Sector Performance 1987-2007," Working Paper Series 4003, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  38. Evans, Lewis, 1998. "The Critical Importance of Information: Incentive Regulation and its Application in Electricity," Working Paper Series 3935, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  39. James Alleman & Gary Madden & Scott Savage, 2000. "Trade imbalance in international message telephone services," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(10), pages 1311-1321.
  40. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19117 is not listed on IDEAS
  41. Amann, Edmund & Baer, Werner, 2005. "From the developmental to the regulatory state: the transformation of the government's impact on the Brazilian economy," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 421-431, May.
  42. Gary Madden & Jeffrey Petchey & Aaron Morey, 2011. "Recent Australian Infrastructure Liberalization," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  43. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19074 is not listed on IDEAS
  44. Shilin Zheng & Xinzhu Zhang, 2013. "The effect of the Chinese telecommunications reform on industrial growth: 1994–2007," Chapters, in: Michael Faure & Xinzhu Zhang (ed.), The Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law, chapter 7, pages 233-261, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  45. Manisha Sangekar & Howell, Bronwyn, 2008. "Telecommunications Market Evolution in Finland and New Zealand: Unbundling the Differences," Working Paper Series 4001, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
  46. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19037 is not listed on IDEAS
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.