IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wuppap/128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie teuer ist (uns) die Umwelt? Zur umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnung in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Bartelmus, Peter
  • Albert, Jörg
  • Tschochohei, Heinrich

Abstract

Die amtliche Statistik der Bundesrepublik liefert mit den umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnungen (UGR) ein modulares Rahmenwerk, das wichtige, aberfragmentarische Daten zu einzelnen Umweltbelastungen liefert. Die in Tonnenaggregierten Rohstoffnutzungen und Emissionen zeigen Trends und Ursachen fürverschiedene Belastungen, können aber nicht das weltweit anerkannte Leitbildnachhaltigen Wirtschaftens operationalisieren. Hierfür bietet sich die von denVereinten Nationen propagierte integrierte umweltökonomische Gesamtrechnung(IUGR) an. Vor deren Implementierung schrecken allerdings sowohl dieamtlichen Statistiker als auch ein eigens eingesetzter wissenschaftlicher Beiratnoch zurück.Der hier vorgelegte Überblick über die Methodik und Aussagekraft der IUGR stellt dar, wie Nachhaltigkeit als Erhaltung des produzierten und Naturkapitals definiert und gemessen werden kann - konsistent und daher vergleichbar mit denwichtigsten Wirtschaftsindikatoren. Eine Pilotstudie der IUGR illustriert dies fürDeutschland. Sie zeigt ferner am Beispiel der Ökosteuer, wie Umweltkosten fürden rationalen Einsatz von Marktinstrumenten der Nachhaltigkeitspolitikverwendet werden können.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartelmus, Peter & Albert, Jörg & Tschochohei, Heinrich, 2003. "Wie teuer ist (uns) die Umwelt? Zur umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnung in Deutschland," Wuppertal Papers 128, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wuppap:128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49104/1/36624373X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William D. Nordhaus & James Tobin, 1973. "Is Growth Obsolete?," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, pages 509-564, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Lomborg,Bjørn, 2001. "The Skeptical Environmentalist," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521010689.
    3. Stefan Bach & Michael Kohlhaas & Bernd Meyer & Barbara Praetorius & Heinz Welsch, 2001. "Modellgestützte Analyse der ökologischen Steuerreform mit LEAN, PANTA RHEI: und dem Potsdamer Mikrosimulationsmodell," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 248, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Bringezu, Stefan, 2002. "Towards sustainable resource management in the European Union," Wuppertal Papers 121, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    5. Lawrence Goulder, 1995. "Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 157-183, August.
    6. Peter Bartelmus, 2000. "Sustainable development: paradigm or paranoia?," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 358-369.
    7. William J. Baumol & Wallace E. Oates, 1971. "The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Peter Bohm & Allen V. Kneese (ed.), The Economics of Environment, pages 53-65, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Stefan Bach, 1997. "Steuerreform in Deutschland," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 66(3/4), pages 291-316.
    9. Wolfgang Riege-Wcislo & Angela Heinze, 1999. "Empirical results and experiences for the estimation of selected nitrogen abatement cost curves in Germany," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 95-126.
    10. Bartelmus, Peter, 2002. "Dematerialization and capital maintenance: Two sides of the sustainability coin," Wuppertal Papers 120, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartelmus, Peter, 2009. "The cost of natural capital consumption: Accounting for a sustainable world economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1850-1857, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartelmus, Peter, 2003. "Dematerialization and capital maintenance: two sides of the sustainability coin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 61-81, August.
    2. Bartelmus, Peter, 2002. "Dematerialization and capital maintenance: Two sides of the sustainability coin," Wuppertal Papers 120, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    3. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    4. Hassan, Mahmoud & Oueslati, Walid & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    5. Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Ilai Levin & Alessia Pagani & Mauro Pisu & Åsa Johansson, 2022. "A framework to decarbonise the economy," OECD Economic Policy Papers 31, OECD Publishing.
    6. Christoph Böhringer & Robert Schwager, 2003. "Die Ökologische Steuerreform in Deutschland – ein umweltpolitisches Feigenblatt," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(2), pages 211-222, May.
    7. Pezzey, John C.V., 2001. "Distributing the Value of a Country’s Tradeable Carbon Permits," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125832, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Crago, Christine Lasco & Khanna, Madhu, 2014. "Carbon abatement in the fuel market with biofuels: Implications for second best policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 89-103.
    9. Karl Aiginger & Heinz Handler & Margit Schratzenstaller & Gunther Tichy & et al., 2008. "Ziele und Optionen der Steuerreform. Plädoyer für einen anspruchsvollen Ansatz," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 33939, April.
    10. Ayres, Robert U., 2008. "Sustainability economics: Where do we stand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 281-310, September.
    11. Jarmila Zimmermannová & Karel Korba, 2010. "Comparison of CO2 Taxation in European Union Member States [Komparace zdanění CO2 v zemích evropské unie]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(3), pages 30-48.
    12. Stefano Carattini & Maria Carvalho & Sam Fankhauser, 2018. "Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(5), September.
    13. Fisher, Anthony C & Peterson, Frederick M, 1976. "The Environment in Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, March.
    14. Rakhmindyarto, Rakhmindyarto & Setyawan, Dhani, 2020. "Understanding the political challenges of introducing a carbon tax in Indonesia," MPRA Paper 111586, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Aug 2020.
    15. Anger, Niels & Böhringer, Christoph & Löschel, Andreas, 2010. "Paying the piper and calling the tune?: A meta-regression analysis of the double-dividend hypothesis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1495-1502, May.
    16. Lars Håkonsen & Lars Mathiesen, 1997. "CO 2 -stabilization may be a ‘no-regrets’ policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 171-198, March.
    17. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Mathias Kirchner & Mark Sommer & Kurt Kratena & Stefan E. Weishaar & Irene Burgers, 2018. "CATs – Carbon Taxes in Austria. Implementation Issues and Impacts," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61185, April.
    18. Richard S. J. Tol, 2021. "Selfish Bureaucrats And Policy Heterogeneity In Nordhaus’ Dice," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert Mendelsohn (ed.), CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS Commemoration of Nobel Prize for William Nordhaus, chapter 6, pages 77-92, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Joseph E. Aldy & Alan J. Krupnick & Richard G. Newell & Ian W. H. Parry & William A. Pizer, 2010. "Designing Climate Mitigation Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 903-934, December.
    20. Mariana Conte Grand & Alejandro Rasteletti, 2021. "Pérdidas de bienestar por imposición subóptima en los impuestos a las gasolinas en América Latina y el Caribe," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 821, Universidad del CEMA.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wuppap:128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wikuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.