IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/p0032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mehrebenenpolitik im vollendeten Binnenmarkt

Author

Listed:
  • Scharpf, Fritz W.

Abstract

In der Europäischen Gemeinschaft wird die Problemlösungsfähigkeit der Mitgliedstaaten durch die Rechtsregeln der negativen Integration beschränkt,´welche nationale Maßnahmen ausschließen, die als Handelshindernisse oder Wettbewerbsverzerrung interpretiert werden können. Diese Regeln werden innerhalb des Rechtssystems formuliert und ohne Legitimationsprobleme effektiv durchgesetzt. Dagegen leidet die von der europäischen Politik erwartete positive Integration unter Legitimationsdefiziten und wird nach wie vor durchhohe Konsenserfordernisse im Ministerrat begrenzt. Diese treffen in erster Linie die prozeßbezogenen oder standortbezogenen Maßnahmen einer europäischen Sozialpolitik oder Umweltpolitik, während bei den produktbezogenenRegelungen das gemeinsame Interesse aller Mitgliedstaaten am Zugang zum größeren europäischen Markt die Einigung erleichtert. Als Folge dieser Asymmetrie zwischen effektiver negativer Integration und begrenzter positiver Integration hat die Politik in Europa heute im Vergleich zu den Nachkriegsjahrzehnten eine geringere Fähigkeit zur sozialstaatlichen und ökologischen Zivilisierung der kapitalistischen Ökonomie. Der Aufsatz erörtert Möglichkeiten einer Steigerung der politischen Problemlösungsfähigkeit auf der europäischen wie auf der nationalstaatlichen Ebene.

Suggested Citation

  • Scharpf, Fritz W., 1994. "Mehrebenenpolitik im vollendeten Binnenmarkt," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43174/1/180738240.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giandomenico Majone, 1993. "The European Community Between Social Policy and Social Regulation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 153-170, June.
    2. J.H.H. Weiler, 1993. "Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 417-446, December.
    3. Müller-Armack Alfred, 1964. "Die Wirtschaftsordnung des Gemeinsamen Marktes," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 13(3), pages 7-20, December.
    4. Stephan Leibfried & Paul Pierson, 1992. "Prospects for Social Europe," Politics & Society, , vol. 20(3), pages 333-366, September.
    5. Merkel, Wolfgang, 1993. "Ende der Sozialdemokratie?: Machtressourcen und Regierungspolitik im westeuropäischen Vergleich," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 30, number 112645.
    6. Garrett, Geoffrey, 1992. "International cooperation and institutional choice: the European Community's internal market," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 533-560, April.
    7. Kevin Featherstone, 1994. "Jean Monnet and the ‘Democratic Deficit’ in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 149-170, June.
    8. Burley, Anne-Marie & Mattli, Walter, 1993. "Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 41-76, January.
    9. Müller-Armack Alfred, 1964. "Die Wirtschaftsordnung des Gemeinsamen Marktes," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 173-186, April.
    10. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1993. "Autonomieschonend und gemeinschaftsverträglich: Zur Logik der europäischen Mehrebenenpolitik," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gawel, Erik & Strunz, Sebastian & Lehmann, Paul, 2014. "Wie viel Europa braucht die Energiewende?," UFZ Discussion Papers 4/2014, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Patricia Bauer, 1995. "East-West economic cooperation," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 30(6), pages 285-293, November.
    3. Spengel, Christoph & Fischer, Leonie & Stutzenberger, Kathrin, 2020. "Breaking borders? The European Court of Justice and internal market," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-059, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Grimmel, 2011. "Integration and the Context of Law: Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    2. Joerges, Christian, 1997. "States Without a Market? Comments on the German Constitutional Court's Maastricht-Judgement and a Plea for Interdisciplinary Discourses," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 1, November.
    3. Grimmel, Andreas, 2011. "Politics in robes? The European Court of Justice and the myth of judicial activism," Discussion Papers 2/11, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    4. Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2016. "Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 547-567, December.
    5. Seikel, Daniel, 2011. "Wie die Europäische Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzt: Der Konflikt um das öffentlich-rechtliche Bankenwesen in Deutschland," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Fritz W. Scharpf, 2009. "The Asymmetry of European Integration - or why the EU cannot be a Social Market Economy," KFG Working Papers p0006, Free University Berlin.
    7. Höpner, Martin, 2008. "Usurpation statt Delegation: Wie der EuGH die Binnenmarktintegration radikalisiert und warum er politischer Kontrolle bedarf," MPIfG Discussion Paper 08/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Keith Dowding, 2000. "Institutionalist Research on the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 125-144, February.
    9. Clifford J. Carrubba & Matthew Gabel, 2005. "Do Governments Sway European Court of Justice Decision-making?: Evidence from Government Court Briefs," Working Papers 2005-06, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.
    10. Dieter Sadowski & Martin Schneider & Karin Wagner, 1994. "The Impact of European Integration and German Unification on Industrial Relations in Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 523-537, December.
    11. Mayntz, Renate (ed.), 2002. "Akteure – Mechanismen – Modelle: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 42, number 42.
    12. Mark A. Pollack, 2007. "The New Institutionalisms and European Integration," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0031, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    13. Hristina RUNCHEVA TASEV & Milena APOSTOLOVSKA-STEPANOSKA & Leposava OGNJANOSKA, 2020. "Union based on the rule of law: the Court of Justice of the European Union and the (future of) European integration," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 396-426, December.
    14. Brooks, Eleanor, 2012. "Crossing borders: A critical review of the role of the European Court of Justice in EU health policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 33-37.
    15. Höpner, Martin & Schäfer, Armin, 2012. "Integration among unequals: How the heterogeneity of European varieties of capitalism shapes the social and democratic potential of the EU," MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    16. Dyevre, Arthur & Lampach, Nicolas, 2018. "The origins of regional integration: Untangling the effect of trade on judicial cooperation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 122-133.
    17. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2010. "Community and autonomy: Institutions, policies and legitimacy in multilevel Europe," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 68, number 68.
    18. William Phelan, 2008. "Why do EU Member States Offer a 'Constitutional' Obedience to EU Obligations? Encompassing Domestic Institutions and Costly International Obligations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp256, IIIS.
    19. Cohen & Antonin, 2008. "Scarlet Robes, Dark Suits: The Social Recruitment of the European Court of Justice," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 35, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    20. Cichowski, Rachel A., 2000. "Policy Paper 53: European Legal Integration and Environmental Protection," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt799928k5, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.