IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/1710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grundfreiheiten als Liberalisierungsgebote? Reformoptionen im Kontext der EU-Reformdebatte

Author

Listed:
  • Höpner, Martin

Abstract

Das Papier wendet sich an die Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer der EU-Reformdebatte. Ich schlage vor, die im Weißbuch der Kommission zur Zukunft Europas angemahnte Debatte nicht auf die politischen Kompetenzen der EU zu verengen. Stattdessen sollten jene Einschränkungen politischer Handlungsspielräume in den Blick gerückt werden, die durch die extensive Interpretation der europäischen Grundfreiheiten entstanden sind. Den Grundfreiheiten fehlen bisher immanente Schranken, die das Recht auf transnationale Binnenmarktnutzung effektiv von einem etwaigen Recht auf Deregulierung interner Sachverhalte mit allenfalls schwachem Binnenmarktbezug abgrenzen. Fünf Reformoptionen werden im Papier diskutiert und verglichen: Das Soziale Fortschrittsprotokoll, der Verweis des Binnenmarktrechts in das europäische Sekundärrecht, die Präzisierung der Grundfreiheiten als Verbote offener oder verdeckter Ungleichbehandlung, Bereichsausnahmen sowie sekundärrechtliche Lösungen. Der Status quo, so zeigt sich, ist nicht alternativlos.

Suggested Citation

  • Höpner, Martin, 2017. "Grundfreiheiten als Liberalisierungsgebote? Reformoptionen im Kontext der EU-Reformdebatte," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162560/1/890872597.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattli, Walter & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 1998. "Revisiting the European Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 177-209, January.
    2. Werner, Benjamin, 2013. "Der Streit um das VW-Gesetz: Wie Europäische Kommission und Europäischer Gerichtshof die Unternehmenskontrolle liberalisieren," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 79, number 79.
    3. Seikel, Daniel, 2013. "Der Kampf um öffentlich-rechtliche Banken: Wie die Europäische Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzt," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 77, number 77.
    4. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1999. "Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch?," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 0, number sbd-1999.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Höpner, Martin, 2008. "Usurpation statt Delegation: Wie der EuGH die Binnenmarktintegration radikalisiert und warum er politischer Kontrolle bedarf," MPIfG Discussion Paper 08/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2016. "De-constitutionalization and majority rule: A democratic vision for Europe," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/14, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Höpner, Martin, 2014. "Wie der Europäische Gerichtshof und die Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzen: Befunde aus der MPIfG-Forschungsgruppe zur Politischen Ökonomie der europäischen Integration," MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Weidner, Helmut, 2005. "Global equity versus public interest? The case of climate change policy in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2005-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Stefan Voigt, "undated". "Iudex Calculat: The ECJ's Quest for Power," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2003-1-1066, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    6. Sigrid Quack & Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2005. "Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement," Post-Print hal-01892003, HAL.
    7. Arnaud Lechevalier & Jan Wielgohs, 2015. "Social Europe: A Dead End," Post-Print halshs-03781863, HAL.
    8. Libman, Alexander, 2005. "Взаимодействие Государственных И Частных Структур В Интеграционных Группировах: Теоретические Подходы И Опыт Снг [Interaction of Public and Private Actors in Regional Integration Groups - Theoretic," MPRA Paper 17044, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mayntz, Renate & Scharpf, Fritz W., 2005. "Politische Steuerung - Heute?," MPIfG Working Paper 05/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    11. José Luis Castro-Montero & Edwin Alblas & Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2018. "The Court of Justice and treaty revision: A case of strategic leniency?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 570-596, December.
    12. Jean-Yves Pitarakis & George Tridimas, 2003. "Joint Dynamics of Legal and Economic Integration in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 357-368, November.
    13. Weidner, Helmut, 2002. "Gemeinwohl und Nachhaltigkeit: Ein prekäres Verhältnis," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 02-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    15. Lars Hornuf & Stefan Voigt, 2015. "Analyzing preliminary references as the powerbase of the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 287-311, April.
    16. Höpner, Martin, 2010. "Warum betreibt der Europäische Gerichtshof Rechtsfortbildung? Die Politisierungshypothese," MPIfG Working Paper 10/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    17. Heather A. D. Mbaye, 2001. "Why National States Comply with Supranational Law," European Union Politics, , vol. 2(3), pages 259-281, October.
    18. Höpner, Martin & Haas, Christine, 2021. "Dürfen europäische Gesetze Grundfreiheiten einschränken?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 21/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Bálint L. TÓTH, 2019. "The Visegrád Group and the railway development interest articulation in Central Eastern Europe," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 175-195, December.
    20. Budzinski, Oliver & Eckert, Sandra, 2015. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 93, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:1710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.