IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/202106.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diskursversagen durch moralische Vor- und Fehl-Urteile: Die ordonomische Perspektive

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Dieser Artikel zeigt auf, wie das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm moralische Vorund Fehl-Urteile, insbesondere in Form intentionalistischer und moralistischer Fehlschlüsse, konstruktiv kritisiert und damit - als Ethik - konstruktive Beiträge liefert, einem Diskursversagen mit überlegenen Argumenten entgegenzutreten.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2021. "Diskursversagen durch moralische Vor- und Fehl-Urteile: Die ordonomische Perspektive," Discussion Papers 2021-06, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249254/1/1782394524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2001. "Eucken und von Hayek im Vergleich," Untersuchungen zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 43, number urn:isbn:9783161476365, September.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2020. "Das Moralparadoxon der Moderne: Ordonomische Überlegungen zur modernen Ethik als Ethik der Moderne," Discussion Papers 2020-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2021. "Kapitalismus als System zur Verwirklichung moralischer Anliegen - Ordonomische Denkanstöße," Discussion Papers 2021-01, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Petrick, Martin, 2004. "Governing Structural Change And Externalities In Agriculture: Toward A Normative Institutional Economics Of Rural Development," IAMO Discussion Papers 14878, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Eigenverantwortliche Individuen und Pro-Aktive Unternehmen," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe V-48-07, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2009. "Ludwig von Mises als Theoretiker des Liberalismus," Discussion Papers 2009-10, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2009. "Sozialstruktur und Semantik - Ordonomik als Forschungsprogramm in der modernen (Welt-)Gesellschaft," Discussion Papers 2009-6, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2004. "Wirtschaftsethik als Beitrag zur Ordnungspolitik: Ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsprogramm demokratischer Politikberatung," Discussion Papers 2004-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Dathe Uwe, 2009. "Walter Euckens Weg zum Liberalismus (1918-1934) / Walter Eucken’s way to liberalism (1918-1934)," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 60(1), pages 53-86, January.
    8. Pies, Ingo, 2017. "Replik: eine interdisziplinäre Verständigung ist schwierig, aber möglich und lohnend," Discussion Papers 2017-07, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Haftung und Innovation: Ordonomische Überlegungen zur Aktualisierung der ordnungspolitischen Konzeption," Discussion Papers 2011-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Martin Petrick & Ingo Pies, 2007. "In search for rules that secure gains from cooperation: the heuristic value of social dilemmas for normative institutional economics," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 251-271, June.
    11. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "F. A. von Hayek und die moralische Qualität des Wettbewerbs," Discussion Papers 2014-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    12. Kovács, János Mátyás, 2011. "Petering out or flaming up? New Institutional Economics in East-Central Europe," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 13(1), pages 28-39.
    13. Pies, Ingo, 2009. "Hayeks Diagnose der Moderne: Lessons (to be) learnt für das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm," Discussion Papers 2009-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    14. Pies Ingo, 2019. "Donald Blacks Moralsoziologie," Journal for Markets and Ethics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 51-63, December.
    15. Pies Ingo & Sass Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? – Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen / How Managerial Compensation Should (not) be Regulate," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 231-268, January.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2011-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Karl Homanns Programm einer ökonomischen Ethik – "A View From Inside" in zehn Thesen," Discussion Papers 2011-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Pies, Ingo, 2005. "Ökonomische Ethik: Zur Überwindung politischer Denk- und Handlungsblockaden," Discussion Papers 2005-10, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    19. Dathe, Uwe, 2009. "Walter Eucken und der Staat: Zum Zusammenhang von wirtschaftlichem und politischem Liberalismus 1918 - 1934," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2009-05, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    20. Pies, Ingo, 2020. "Tote durch Tabus: Ordonomische Beobachtungen und Reflexionen zu Moral und Ethik in der Corona-Krise," Discussion Papers 2020-05, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ordonomik; Wachstum; De-Growth; Klimapolitik; Moralparadoxon der Moderne; Diskursversagen; ordonomics; growth; de-growth; climate politics; moral paradox of modernity; discourse failure;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:202106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.