IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkpb/64.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fracking, globale Energiemärkte und die zukünftige Klimapolitik

Author

Listed:
  • Delzeit, Ruth
  • Klepper, Gernot
  • Lange, Mareike

Abstract

[Einleitung] Chancen und Risiken der Gewinnung von Erdgas oder -öl aus unkonventionellen Lagerstätten und das dabei zum Einsatz kommende Verfahren des Hydraulic Fracturing (Fracking, deutsch: aufbrechen) werden derzeit in der Politik und Öffentlichkeit intensiv diskutiert. Als unkonventionelle Erdgasvorkommen bezeichnet man schwerer zugängliche Vorkommen, deren Gas durch technische Maßnahmen in den Lagerstätten erst mobilisiert werden muss. Dafür wird mit sehr hohem Druck chemisch behandelte Flüssigkeit (Frack-Fluide) in dichte Gesteinsschichten gepresst, um die Schiefergasvorkommen zu fördern (NRW 2012). Im Mittelpunkt der öffentlichen Diskussion stehen der Zielkonflikt zwischen möglichen energiewirtschaftlichen und -politischen Vorteilen und den Risiken für Mensch und Umwelt. In den USA wird bereits seit einigen Jahren unkonventionelles Erdgas durch Fracking gefördert. Somit gibt es erste Erfahrungen über dessen Vor- und Nachteile. Befürworter der Nutzung der Fracking-Technologie weisen auf stark gesunkene Energiepreise in den USA hin und begründen damit die Reindustrialisierung der US-amerikanischen Industrie (SRU 2013). Ein weiterer Vorteil wird in der Verbesserung der Versorgungssicherheit durch heimische Energiequellen gesehen. Gegner der Nutzung der Fracking-Technologie warnen vor möglichen Risiken und lokalen Umweltauswirkungen. Zudem stellen sie die Langfristigkeit der Preissenkungen in Frage und warnen vor negativen Auswirkungen auf die Ziele der Klimapolitik sowie den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien. Mit diesem Policy Brief tragen wir zu dieser Diskussion bei, indem wir Erdgas aus unkonventionellen Quellen anderen fossilen Energieträgern sowie erneuerbaren Energieträgern gegenüberstellen und hinsichtlich ihres Beitrags zur Energiewende, klimapolitischen Zielen und lokalen Umwelteffekten analysieren. Die Analyse baut auf einer Übersicht über globale, europäische und deutsche Potenziale und über die aktuelle Förderung auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Delzeit, Ruth & Klepper, Gernot & Lange, Mareike, 2013. "Fracking, globale Energiemärkte und die zukünftige Klimapolitik," Kiel Policy Brief 64, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81132/1/756924545.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick, Sebastian & Thoenes, Stefan, 2014. "What drives natural gas prices? — A structural VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 517-527.
    2. James Murray & David King, 2012. "Oil's tipping point has passed," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7382), pages 433-435, January.
    3. Delzeit, Ruth & Lange, Mareike & Brunsch, Annemarie, 2011. "Maiswüsten in Schleswig-Holstein? Das neue EEG und der Flächenbedarf unterschiedlicher Biogassubstrate," Kiel Policy Brief 40, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dukhanina, Ekaterina & Massol, Olivier & Lévêque, François, 2019. "Policy measures targeting a more integrated gas market: Impact of a merger of two trading zones on prices and arbitrage activity in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 583-593.
    2. Lovcha, Yuliya & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro, 2020. "Dynamic frequency connectedness between oil and natural gas volatilities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 181-189.
    3. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2018. "On the interdependence of natural gas and stock markets under structural breaks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 149-161.
    4. Madina D. Sharapiyeva & Kunanbayeva Duissekul & Nurseiytova Gulmira & Kozhamkulova Zhanna, 2019. "Energy Efficiency of Transport and Logistics Infrastructure: The Example of the Republic of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 331-338.
    5. Liang, Chao & Xia, Zhenglan & Lai, Xiaodong & Wang, Lu, 2022. "Natural gas volatility prediction: Fresh evidence from extreme weather and extended GARCH-MIDAS-ES model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Gautam, Tej K. & Paudel, Krishna P., 2018. "The demand for natural gas in the Northeastern United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 890-898.
    7. Hendrik Schmitz & Reinhard Madlener, 2020. "Heterogeneity in price responsiveness for residential space heating in Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2255-2281, November.
    8. Franco Ruzzenenti, 2015. "Changes in the relationship between the financial and real sector and the present economic financial crisis: study of energy sector and market," Working papers wpaper105, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    9. Drachal, Krzysztof, 2021. "Forecasting crude oil real prices with averaging time-varying VAR models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Mensi, Walid & Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2021. "Dynamic frequency relationships and volatility spillovers in natural gas, crude oil, gas oil, gasoline, and heating oil markets: Implications for portfolio management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Su, Chi-Wei & Yuan, Xi & Umar, Muhammad & Chang, Tsangyao, 2022. "Dynamic price linkage of energies in transformation: Evidence from quantile connectedness," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Wang, Jiqian & Ma, Feng & Bouri, Elie & Zhong, Juandan, 2022. "Volatility of clean energy and natural gas, uncertainty indices, and global economic conditions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Halser, Christoph & Paraschiv, Florentina & Russo, Marianna, 2023. "Oil–gas price relationships on three continents: Disruptions and equilibria," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    14. Christian Mandl & Selvaprabu Nadarajah & Stefan Minner & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2022. "Data‐driven storage operations: Cross‐commodity backtest and structured policies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2438-2456, June.
    15. Mingjing Guo & Yan Bu & Jinhua Cheng & Ziyu Jiang, 2018. "Natural Gas Security in China: A Simulation of Evolutionary Trajectory and Obstacle Degree Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Stavros Stavroyiannis, 2022. "Cointegration and ARDL specification between the Dubai crude oil and the US natural gas market," Papers 2206.03278, arXiv.org.
    17. Indupurnahayu & Edhie Budi Setiawan & Lira Agusinta & Ryan Firdiansyah Suryawan & Prasadja Ricardianto & Mustika Sari & Sri Mulyono & Reza Fauzi Jaya Sakti, 2021. "Changes in Demand and Supply of the Crude Oil Market During the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Effects on the Natural Gas Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6.
    18. Zied Ftiti & Kais Tissaoui & Sahbi Boubaker, 2022. "On the relationship between oil and gas markets: a new forecasting framework based on a machine learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 915-943, June.
    19. Chen, Hao & Liao, Hua & Tang, Bao-Jun & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Impacts of OPEC's political risk on the international crude oil prices: An empirical analysis based on the SVAR models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 42-49.
    20. Hanfeld, Marc & Schlüter, Stephan, 2016. "Operating a swing option on today's gas markets: How least squares Monte Carlo works and why it is beneficial," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 10/2016, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkpb:64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.