IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkbw/4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potenziale zum Subventionsabbau in Baden-Württemberg

Author

Listed:
  • Klodt, Henning
  • Laaser, Claus-Friedrich
  • Rosenschon, Astrid

Abstract

Subventionsabbau tut Not - nicht nur als Absichtserklärung, sondern auch als konkrete politische Handlung. Ausschlaggebend dafür sind fünf Gründe: Erstens verzerren Subventionen die Wirtschaftsstruktur zugunsten der Subventionsempfänger und zulasten aller anderen, von denen die zur Finanzierung der Subventionspolitik nötigen Mittel eingetrieben werden. Zweitens mindern Subventionen die Anreize, den Fortschritt voranzutreiben und Kosten zu senken. Drittens verursachen Subventionen gesamtwirtschaftlich unproduktive Kosten auf Seiten der Subventionsempfänger, da es für diese lohnend wird eigene Ressourcen aufzuwenden, um in den Genuss staatlicher Hilfsgelder zu gelangen. Viertens verursachen Subventionen Bürokratiekosten auf Seiten des Staates, da Subventionsprogramme entwickelt, verwaltet und überwacht werden wollen. Fünftens schließlich verdrängen Subventionen bessere Verwendungsalternativen in der Staatswirtschaft (investive Ausgaben und/oder niedrigere Schulden) und stehen Steuersenkungen im Wege.

Suggested Citation

  • Klodt, Henning & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Rosenschon, Astrid, 2012. "Potenziale zum Subventionsabbau in Baden-Württemberg," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 4, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/66232/1/727643908.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andréa Jean Baker, 2017. "Algorithms to Assess Music Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    2. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    3. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    4. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Cappelli Lucio & D’ascenzo Fabrizio & Ruggieri Roberto & Rossetti Francesca & Scalingi Alessandra, 2019. "The attitude of consumers towards “Made in Italy” products. An empirical analysis among Italian customers," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 31-47, March.
    6. Chiara Dalle Nogare & Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, 2021. "Do museums foster innovation through engagement with the cultural and creative industries?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(4), pages 671-704, December.
    7. Malgorzata Galecka & Katarzyna Smolny, 2021. "Productivity of Public Theatres in the Times of COVID-19: The Example of Polish Theatres," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 667-678.
    8. Jen D Snowball & Geoff G Antrobus, 2021. "Festival value in multicultural contexts: City festivals in South Africa," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(6), pages 1256-1275, September.
    9. Kabanda,Patrick, 2016. "Creative trade for human development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7684, The World Bank.
    10. Rushton, Michael, 2019. "Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Silvia Cerisola, 2018. "Multiple creative talents and their determinants at the local level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(2), pages 243-269, May.
    12. Weber, Cameron & Zhen, Ying & Arias, JJ, 2022. "Practice, Entrepreneurship and Subjectivity in Artist Identification with Applications to the Covid-Era," MPRA Paper 115712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "World Heritage: Where Are We? An Empirical Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-31, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    14. KOZLOVA Maria, 2017. "Regional differentiation in Russian cultural industries: the statistical measurement and the results for the state government," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 17(2), pages 47-60.
    15. Terry Flew & Adam Swift, 2013. "Cultural policy," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 14, pages 155-161, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Enrico Bertacchini & Federico Revelli, 2021. "Kalòs kai agathòs? government quality and cultural heritage in the regions of Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 513-539, October.
    17. Kanika Khurana & Atanu Ghosh, 2023. "Management in the Performing Arts: An Empirical Exploration of Organizational Structures in Indian Theatre," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(1), pages 67-84, January.
    18. Sang Do Park, 2022. "Policy Discourse Among the Chinese Public on Initiatives for Cultural and Creative Industries: Text Mining Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    19. Rasa Pranskūnienė & Erika Zabulionienė, 2023. "Towards Heritage Transformation Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.