IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial3p667-678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity of Public Theatres in the Times of COVID-19: The Example of Polish Theatres

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Galecka
  • Katarzyna Smolny

Abstract

Purpose: Our article aims to analyze the changes in the productivity of cultural institutions during the Covid -2019 pandemic. We studied how much productivity has changed and saw which indicator was targeting the influx. The number of visitors in the theatre in a given year is taken as productivity. The research period is the years 2016-2020. We hypothesize that the productivity index in 2020 depended on most on the technology change. Design/Methodology/Approach: The proper study was focused on Polish Public Theatres. The verification of the assumptions was conducted through the Malmquist index -Total Factor Productivity. Findings: As a result of the research, it was found that the hypothesis was positively verified. The value of the Malmiqusita index shows significant changes in productivity between 2020-2019 and 2019-2016. In particular, the considerable increase of the technological progress index is worth noting. In 2020-2019, the annual change regarding this index was as high as 1208.8%, while the technical efficiency decreased to 13.9% and TFP was 168.2% - the highest level over the whole period considered. Practical implications: We noticed that for individual theaters, the productivity results were different. It means that not all of the theatres studied coped with the new conditions. Depending on the organization, the effects of using digital technologies may be different. This proves that each unit should be analyzed individually. Originality/value: These results seem to fully reflect the pandemic reality in which the technological factor was of crucial importance, an innovative research to describe the pandemic in the theatre sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Galecka & Katarzyna Smolny, 2021. "Productivity of Public Theatres in the Times of COVID-19: The Example of Polish Theatres," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 667-678.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:667-678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2521/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne-Kathrin Last & Heike Wetzel, 2010. "The efficiency of German public theaters: a stochastic frontier analysis approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(2), pages 89-110, May.
    2. Anne-Kathrin Last & Heike Wetzel, 2011. "Baumol’s cost disease, efficiency, and productivity in the performing arts: an analysis of german public theaters," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(3), pages 185-201, August.
    3. John O’Hagan & Adriana Neligan, 2005. "State Subsidies and Repertoire Conventionality in the Non-Profit English Theatre Sector: An Econometric Analysis," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 29(1), pages 35-57, February.
    4. Perez-Laborda, Alejandro & Perez-Sebastian, Fidel, 2020. "Capital-skill complementarity and biased technical change across US sectors," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259.
    6. Małgorzata Gałecka & Katarzyna Smolny, 2017. "Financing rules of the activity of cultural institutions in the context of economic efficiency," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 16(4), pages 387-399, December.
    7. Malgorzata Galecka & Katarzyna Smolny, 2017. "Financing rules of the activity of cultural institutions in the context of economic efficiency," Working Papers 27/2017, Institute of Economic Research, revised May 2017.
    8. Pauget, Bertrand & Tobelem, Jean-Michel & Bootz, Jean-Philippe, 2021. "The future of French museums in 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, December.
    10. Subodh Kumar & R. Robert Russell, 2002. "Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 527-548, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Sabrina Auci & Laura Castellucci & Manuela Coromaldi, 2021. "How does public spending affect technical efficiency? Some evidence from 15 European countries," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 108-130, January.
    3. Víctor Fernández-Blanco & Ana Rodríguez-Álvarez & Aleksandra Wiśniewska, 2019. "Measuring technical efficiency and marginal costs in the performing arts: the case of the municipal theatres of Warsaw," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(1), pages 97-119, March.
    4. Tero Kuusi, 2015. "The dynamics of ICT adaptation and the productivity gaps across advanced nations," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 175-188, October.
    5. Hedayet Chowdhury & Walter Wodchis & Audrey Laporte, 2011. "Efficiency and technological change in health care services in Ontario," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 721-745, September.
    6. Maria Teresa Balaguer‐Coll & Isabel Narbón‐Perpiñá & Jesús Peiró‐Palomino & Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, 2022. "Quality of government and economic growth at the municipal level: Evidence from Spain," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 96-124, January.
    7. Víctor Fernández-Blanco & Ana Rodríguez-Álvarez, 2018. "Measuring allocative efficiency in Cultural Economics: the case of “Fundación Princesa de Asturias” (The Princess of Asturias Foundation)," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(1), pages 91-110, February.
    8. Surya Bhushan, 2021. "Labour Productivity Dynamics in Indian Agriculture: 2000–2016," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 64(2), pages 371-388, June.
    9. Natalia Merkina, 2009. "Technological catch-up or resource rents?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 59-82, June.
    10. Pompei, Fabrizio, 2013. "Efficiency And Productivity Growth Across The Italian Regions: The Regional Divide Revisited," MPRA Paper 52052, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Anne-Kathrin Last & Heike Wetzel, 2011. "Baumol’s cost disease, efficiency, and productivity in the performing arts: an analysis of german public theaters," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 35(3), pages 185-201, August.
    12. Perilla Jimenez, Juan, 2022. "Income per-capita across-countries," MERIT Working Papers 2022-033, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2023. "Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-247, December.
    14. Victor Fernandez-Blanco & Ana Rodriguez-Alvarez, 2015. "Measuring allocative efficiency in cultural economics: The case of Fundacion Princesa de Asturias," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-09-2015, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Oct 2015.
    15. Federico Inchausti-Sintes & Ubay Pérez-Granja & José Juan Morales-Mohamed, 2021. "Analysing labour productivity and its economic consequences in the two Spanish tourist archipelagos," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1039-1059, August.
    16. Roberto Ezcurra & Belen Iraizoz & Pedro Pascual, 2009. "Total Factor Productivity, Efficiency, and Technological Change in the European Regions: A Nonparametric Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1152-1170, May.
    17. Achten-Gozdowski, Jennifer, 2018. "Geschichte und Politökonomie deutscher Theatersubventionen [History and Political Economy of Public Subsidies for German Theatres and Operas]," MPRA Paper 85087, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kounetas, Kostas & Napolitano, Oreste, 2018. "Modeling the incidence of international trade on Italian regional productive efficiency using a meta-frontier DEA approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 45-58.
    19. Concetta Castiglione & Davide Infante & Marta Zieba, 2018. "Technical efficiency in the Italian performing arts companies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 609-638, October.
    20. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance art organizations; theatre; productivity; Malmquist index value; total factor productivity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:667-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.