IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fubsbe/201916.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Wolbeck, Lena Antonia

Abstract

In industries like health care, public transport or call centers a shift-based system ensures permanent availability of employees for covering needed services. The resource allocation problem - assigning employees to shifts - is known as personnel scheduling in literature and often aims at minimizing staffing costs. Working in shifts, though, impacts employees' private lives which adds to the problem of increasing staff shortage in recent years. Therefore, more and more effort is spent on incorporating fairness into scheduling approaches in order to increase employees' satisfaction. This paper presents a literature review of approaches for personnel scheduling considering fairness aspects. Since fairness is not a quantitative objective, but can be evaluated from different point of views, a large number of fairness measurements exists in the literature. Furthermore, perspective (group vs individual fairness) or time horizon (short-term vs long-term fairness) are often considered very differently. To conclude, we show that a uniform definition and approach for considering fairness in personnel scheduling is challenging and point out gaps for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolbeck, Lena Antonia, 2019. "Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling," Discussion Papers 2019/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:201916
    DOI: 10.17169/refubium-26050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/210988/1/1687314586.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17169/refubium-26050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo & Matteo Fischetti, 1998. "Modeling and Solving the Crew Rostering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 820-830, December.
    2. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 1999. "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 817-868.
    3. B Maenhout & M Vanhoucke, 2009. "The impact of incorporating nurse-specific characteristics in a cyclical scheduling approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1683-1698, December.
    4. Berrada, Ilham & Ferland, Jacques A. & Michelon, Philippe, 1996. "A multi-objective approach to nurse scheduling with both hard and soft constraints," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 183-193, September.
    5. Kalai, Ehud & Smorodinsky, Meir, 1975. "Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 513-518, May.
    6. Jens Brunner & Jonathan Bard & Rainer Kolisch, 2009. "Flexible shift scheduling of physicians," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 285-305, September.
    7. Ralf Borndörfer & Christof Schulz & Stephan Seidl & Steffen Weider, 2017. "Integration of duty scheduling and rostering to increase driver satisfaction," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 177-191, July.
    8. Cheang, B. & Li, H. & Lim, A. & Rodrigues, B., 2003. "Nurse rostering problems--a bibliographic survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 447-460, December.
    9. D. Michael Warner, 1976. "Scheduling Nursing Personnel According to Nursing Preference: A Mathematical Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 842-856, October.
    10. De Bruecker, Philippe & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2015. "Workforce planning incorporating skills: State of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    12. Holmes E. Miller & William P. Pierskalla & Gustave J. Rath, 1976. "Nurse Scheduling Using Mathematical Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 857-870, October.
    13. Rasmussen, Matias Sevel & Justesen, Tor & Dohn, Anders & Larsen, Jesper, 2012. "The Home Care Crew Scheduling Problem: Preference-based visit clustering and temporal dependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 598-610.
    14. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.
    15. Vanhoucke, Mario & Maenhout, Broos, 2009. "On the characterization and generation of nurse scheduling problem instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 457-467, July.
    16. Elina Rönnberg & Torbjörn Larsson, 2010. "Automating the self-scheduling process of nurses in Swedish healthcare: a pilot study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 35-53, March.
    17. D. Parr & J. Thompson, 2007. "Solving the multi-objective nurse scheduling problem with a weighted cost function," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 279-288, November.
    18. Silke Jütte & Daniel Müller & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2017. "Optimizing railway crew schedules with fairness preferences," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 43-55, February.
    19. Andreas Fügener & Jens O. Brunner & Armin Podtschaske, 2015. "Duty and workstation rostering considering preferences and fairness: a case study at a department of anaesthesiology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7465-7487, December.
    20. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2011. "The Price of Fairness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-31, February.
    21. Millar, Harvey H. & Kiragu, Mona, 1998. "Cyclic and non-cyclic scheduling of 12 h shift nurses by network programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 582-592, February.
    22. Erwin Abbink & Matteo Fischetti & Leo Kroon & Gerrit Timmer & Michiel Vromans, 2005. "Reinventing Crew Scheduling at Netherlands Railways," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 393-401, October.
    23. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    24. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    25. Seyda Topaloglu & Irem Ozkarahan, 2004. "An Implicit Goal Programming Model for the Tour Scheduling Problem Considering the Employee Work Preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 135-158, April.
    26. Breugem, T. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D., 2017. "Is Equality always desirable?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2017-30, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    27. Christopher N. Gross & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2019. "Hospital physicians can’t get no long-term satisfaction – an indicator for fairness in preference fulfillment on duty schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 691-708, December.
    28. Jonas Ingels & Broos Maenhout, 2017. "Employee substitutability as a tool to improve the robustness in personnel scheduling," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(3), pages 623-658, July.
    29. Nishi, Tatsushi & Sugiyama, Taichi & Inuiguchi, Masahiro, 2014. "Two-level decomposition algorithm for crew rostering problems with fair working condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 465-473.
    30. Hadi W. Purnomo & Jonathan F. Bard, 2007. "Cyclic preference scheduling for nurses using branch and price," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(2), pages 200-220, March.
    31. Stolletz, Raik & Brunner, Jens O., 2012. "Fair optimization of fortnightly physician schedules with flexible shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 622-629.
    32. Maier-Rothe, Christoph & Wolfe, Harry B., 1973. "Cyclical scheduling and allocation of nursing staff," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 471-487, October.
    33. Stefaan Haspeslagh & Patrick De Causmaecker & Andrea Schaerf & Martin Stølevik, 2014. "The first international nurse rostering competition 2010," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 218(1), pages 221-236, July.
    34. Doi, Tsubasa & Nishi, Tatsushi & Voß, Stefan, 2018. "Two-level decomposition-based matheuristic for airline crew rostering problems with fair working time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 428-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan P. Cavada & Cristián E. Cortés & Gustavo Henríquez & Pablo A. Rey, 2023. "A ground crew shift rostering model for Santiago International Airport," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    2. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    3. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    4. Jan Schoenfelder & Christian Pfefferlen, 2018. "Decision Support for the Physician Scheduling Process at a German Hospital," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 215-229, September.
    5. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.
    6. Vanhoucke, Mario & Maenhout, Broos, 2009. "On the characterization and generation of nurse scheduling problem instances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 457-467, July.
    7. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    8. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Agnetis, Alessandro & Chen, Bo & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea, 2019. "Price of fairness in two-agent single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 79-87.
    10. Breugem, Thomas & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2022. "The price of imposing vertical equity through asymmetric outcome constraints," Other publications TiSEM b6e85652-c54a-4597-a32e-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Thomas Breugem & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2022. "Is Equality Always Desirable? Analyzing the Trade-Off Between Fairness and Attractiveness in Crew Rostering," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2619-2641, April.
    12. Christopher N. Gross & Jens O. Brunner & Manfred Blobner, 2019. "Hospital physicians can’t get no long-term satisfaction – an indicator for fairness in preference fulfillment on duty schedules," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 691-708, December.
    13. Melanie Erhard, 2021. "Flexible staffing of physicians with column generation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 212-252, March.
    14. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Wright, P. Daniel & Mahar, Stephen, 2013. "Centralized nurse scheduling to simultaneously improve schedule cost and nurse satisfaction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1042-1052.
    16. Rajeswari Muniyan & Rajakumar Ramalingam & Sultan S. Alshamrani & Durgaprasad Gangodkar & Ankur Dumka & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Mamoon Rashid, 2022. "Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm with Nelder–Mead Method to Solve Nurse Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Sophie Veldhoven & Gerhard Post & Egbert Veen & Tim Curtois, 2016. "An assessment of a days off decomposition approach to personnel shift scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 207-223, April.
    18. Andreas Fügener & Jens O. Brunner, 2019. "Planning for Overtime: The Value of Shift Extensions in Physician Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 732-744, October.
    19. Deborah L. Kellogg & Steven Walczak, 2007. "Nurse Scheduling: From Academia to Implementation or Not?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 355-369, August.
    20. Dina Bentayeb & Nadia Lahrichi & Louis-Martin Rousseau, 2023. "On integrating patient appointment grids and technologist schedules in a radiology center," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 62-78, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:201916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwfubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.