IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cuswps/70.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bildung in fragilen Zeiten: Die Spirale transformativen Lernens

Author

Listed:
  • Graupe, Silja
  • Bäuerle, Lukas

Abstract

Über Jahrhunderte pädagogischer Praxis hinweg schienen die Ziele der Bildung festgelegt. Sie wurden den Lernenden vorgegeben. In den Krisen der Gegenwart müssen Menschen jedoch lernen dürfen, individuelle und gesellschaftliche Ziele neu zu definieren und zu verwirklichen. Dafür aber braucht es ein neues, transformatives Verständnis von Lernen und den zentralen Akteur:innen von Bildung: den Lernenden. Vor diesem Hintergrund und im Rückgriff auf interdisziplinäre Forschungszusammenhänge entwickeln wir im vorliegenden Beitrag eine transformative Lerntheorie, prägnant zusammengefasst in der "Spirale transformativen Lernens". In ihr werden drei Lernbereiche - neu sein, neu denken, neu handeln - einer neuen transformativen Bildung systematisch integriert und in der Form neun transformativer Fähigkeiten konkretisiert. Der neue Ansatz ist sowohl für den Fachdiskurs zum transformativem Lernen wie auch für Lehrende verschiedenster Fächer und Themenbereiche von Relevanz. Er wurde explizit so offen entwickelt, dass er für konkrete Transformationsarenen und -thematiken zugespitzt, bzw. angepasst werden kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Graupe, Silja & Bäuerle, Lukas, 2022. "Bildung in fragilen Zeiten: Die Spirale transformativen Lernens," Working Paper Series 70, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/261476/1/1810693861.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian J. Loasby, 2007. "Uncertainty, Intelligence and Imagination: George Shackle’s Guide to Human Progress," Chapters, in: Geoffrey M. Hodgson (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. George A. Akerlof & Robert J. Shiller, 2015. "Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10534.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The overselling of globalization," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 129-137, July.
    2. Joseph Stiglitz, 2018. "From manufacturing-led export growth to a twenty-first-century inclusive growth strategy: Explaining the demise of a successful growth model and what to do about it," WIDER Working Paper Series 176, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Joshua Schwartzstein & Adi Sunderam, 2021. "Using Models to Persuade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(1), pages 276-323, January.
    5. Jacquemet, N. & Luchini, S. & Malézieux, A. & Shogren, J.F., 2020. "Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:40-47 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. V. I. Danilov & A. Lambert-Mogiliansky & V. Vergopoulos, 2018. "Dynamic consistency of expected utility under non-classical (quantum) uncertainty," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 645-670, June.
    8. Kaushik Basu & Avinash Dixit, 2017. "Too Small to Regulate," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Falkinger, Josef, 2016. "The order of knowledge and robust action: How to deal with economic uncertainty?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-30.
    10. Francisco Javier Carrillo, 2016. "Knowledge markets: a typology and an overview," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 264-289.
    11. Miller, Marcus & Zhang, Lei, 2019. "Externalities and financial crisis – enough to cause collapse?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1207, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    12. Robert J. Shiller, 2017. "Narrative Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 967-1004, April.
    13. Creutzig, Felix, 2020. "Limits to Liberalism: Considerations for the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul & Haram Seo, 2018. "Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2591-2617, October.
    15. Zhuang, Mengzhou & Cui, Geng & Peng, Ling, 2018. "Manufactured opinions: The effect of manipulating online product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 24-35.
    16. Tomasz Potocki, 2022. "Locating Financial Capability Within Capability Approach – Theoretical Survey," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 96-106.
    17. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The Revolution of Information Economics: The Past and the Future," NBER Working Papers 23780, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Wagner, Alexander F. & Gibson Brandon, Rajna & Sohn, Matthias & Tanner, Carmen, 2018. "Earnings Management and Managerial Honesty: The Investors’ Perspectives," CEPR Discussion Papers 13207, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Benjamin Young, 2022. "Misperception and Cognition in Markets," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Marcus Miller, 2021. "Choosing the Narrative: the Shadow Banking Crisis in Light of Covid," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 291-310, April.
    21. Daniel W. Elfenbein & Raymond Fisman & Brian McManus, 2019. "Does Cheap Talk Affect Market Outcomes? Evidence from eBay," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 305-326, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transformatives Lernen; Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung; Sozioökonomische Bildung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cuswps:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cusanus-hochschule.de/forschung/institut-fuer-oekonomie/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.