IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cauman/88.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The design of interactive coordination games

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Reinhart

Abstract

The design of Interactive coordination games has been described and discussed. The approach of a gaming system, which allows for a combination of gaming modules, is a necessary reply to the multiplicity of design factors. This approach enables the researcher to study human decision behavior and the efficiency of organizational Instruments under controllable conditions. The intro-duction of man-machine-interaction in the study of group behavior will lead to more efficient research on interaction between human beings.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Reinhart, 1980. "The design of interactive coordination games," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 88, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/190921/1/manuskript_088.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. M. Babb & M. A. Leslie & M. D. Van Slyke, 1966. "The Potential of Business-Gaming Methods in Research," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39, pages 465-465.
    2. Banker, Rajiv D., 1980. "A game theoretic approach to measuring efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 262-266, October.
    3. Richard J. Klimoski, 1978. "Simulation Methodologies in Experimental Research on Negotiations by Representatives," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 61-77, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Lozano, S., 2013. "DEA production games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 405-413.
    3. Peter Bogetoft & Kurt Nielsen, 2002. "DEA Based Yardstick Competition in Natural Resource Management," CIE Discussion Papers 2002-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
    4. Kairui Zuo & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 175-194, July.
    5. Lee, Chia-Yen, 2018. "Mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 1013-1024.
    6. Ozren Despić & Mladen Despić & Joseph Paradi, 2007. "DEA-R: ratio-based comparative efficiency model, its mathematical relation to DEA and its use in applications," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 33-44, October.
    7. Marta Biancardi & Lucia Maddalena & Giovanni Villani, 2020. "Groundwater extraction among overlapping generations: a differential game approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 539-556, December.
    8. Rick Antle & Peter Bogetoft, 2019. "Mix Stickiness Under Asymmetric Cost Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2787-2812, June.
    9. Bogetoft, Peter, 1995. "Incentives and productivity measurements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 67-77, April.
    10. Lozano, S., 2012. "Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 558-565.
    11. Hao, Gang & Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong, 2000. "The generalized DEA model and the convex cone constrained game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 515-525, November.
    12. William M. Tracy & Dmitri G. Markovitch & Lois S. Peters & B. V. Phani & Deepu Philip, 2017. "Algorithmic Representations of Managerial Search Behavior," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 343-361, March.
    13. Peter Bogetoft, 2000. "DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 7-48, January.
    14. Jones, Larry D., 1975. "Using Business Management Games As Research Tools In Food Retailing - A Case Study," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, July.
    15. Afsharian, Mohsen & Bogetoft, Peter, 2023. "Limiting flexibility in nonparametric efficiency evaluations: An ex post k-centroid clustering approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 633-647.
    16. Ryan, Michael J., 1999. "Intervening duality and bargaining with a farmer-landowner example," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 688-699, March.
    17. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 3-15.
    18. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2008. "DEA based auctions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 685-700, January.
    19. Abraham Mehrez & J. Randall Brown & Moutaz Khouja, 1992. "Aggregate efficiency measures and Simpson's Paradox," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 329-342, September.
    20. Shanwei Li & Jingjie Li & Junli Ding & Mochen Sun & Chenying Cui, 2023. "A Game Strategy Study on Innovation Efficiency of China’s Listed Charging Pile Companies: Based on Generalized Fuzzy DEA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.