IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/aluivr/88.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does the system of letter conveyance constitute a bottleneck resource?

Author

Listed:
  • Knieps, Günter

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Does the system of letter conveyance constitute a bottleneck resource?," Discussion Papers 88, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:aluivr:88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/47616/1/361183909.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabelmann, Anne, 2001. "Monopolistische Bottlenecks versus wettbewerbsfähige Bereiche im Telekommunikationssektor," Discussion Papers 82, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    2. Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Wettbewerb auf den Ferntransportnetzen der deutschen Gaswirtschaft: Eine netzökonomische Analyse," Discussion Papers 85 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    3. Brunekreeft, Gert & Keller, Katja, 2001. "Sektorspezifische Ex-ante-Regulierung der deutschen Stromwirtschaft?," Discussion Papers 80, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    4. Knieps, Günter, 2000. "Marktkonforme Infrastrukturbenutzungsgebühren: Zur Notwendigkeit eines mehrstufigen Tarifkonzepts," Discussion Papers 70, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    5. Knieps, Günter, 2001. "Regulatory reform of European telecommunications: Past experience and forward-looking perspectives," Discussion Papers 77, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    6. Gabelmann, Anne, 2001. "Regulating European telecommunications markets: Unbundled access to the local loop outside urban areas," Discussion Papers 81, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    7. Knieps, Günter, 2000. "Price Cap als innovatives Regulierungsinstrument in liberalisierten Netzsektoren," Discussion Papers 65, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    8. Knieps, Günter, 2000. "Wettbewerb um Subventionen im Regionalverkehr," Discussion Papers 69, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    9. Knieps, Günter, 2001. "Competition in telecommunications and the internet services: A dynamic perspective," Discussion Papers 78, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    10. Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Entscheidungsorientierte Ermittlung der Kapitalkosten in liberalisierten Netzindustrien," Discussion Papers 86, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    11. Gabelmann, Anne, 0. "Regulating European telecommunications markets: unbundled access to the local loop outside urban areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(10-11), pages 729-741, October.
    12. Brunekreeft, Gert, 2001. "Regulation and third-party discrimination in vertically related markets: The case of German electricity," Discussion Papers 74 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    13. Gabelmann, Anne, 2000. "Regulierung auf lokalen Telekommunikationsmärkten: Entbündelter Netzzugang in der Peripherie," Discussion Papers 68, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    14. Knieps, Günter, 2001. "Strategien zur Vollendung des Binnenmarktes II: Liberalisierung der Netzzugänge," Discussion Papers 79 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    15. Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Wholesale, retail pricing in telecom markets," Discussion Papers 84, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    16. Knieps, Günter, 2000. "Rückführung sektorspezifischer Regulierung auf dem deutschen Telekommunikationsmarkt: Die verpasste Chance des Sondergutachtens der Monopolkommission," Discussion Papers 66, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalevi Dieke, Alex & Schölermann, Sonja, 2007. "Ex-ante-Preisregulierung nach vollständiger Marktöffnung der Briefmärkte," WIK Discussion Papers 294, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    2. Martin Maegli & Christian Jaag & Matthias Finger, 2009. "Co?ts de la r?gulation des industries de r?seau: enseignements du r?seau postal," Working Papers 0015, Swiss Economics.
    3. M. Maegli & C. Jaag & M. Finger, 2010. "Regulatory Governance Costs in Network Industries: Observations in Postal Regulation," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 11(2), pages 207-238, June.
    4. Christian Jaag, 2013. "Intellectual Property Rights and the Future of Universal Service Obligations in Communications," Working Papers 0040, Swiss Economics.
    5. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2011. "The future of the USO - Economic rationale for universal services and implications for a future-oriented USO," Working Papers 0026, Swiss Economics.
    6. P.W.J. De Bijl, 2005. "Structural Separation and Access in Telecommunications Markets," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 6(2), pages 95-115, June.
    7. Maegli, Martin & Jaag, Christian, 2009. "Regulatory Governance Costs in Network Industries: Implicatins for postal Regulation," MPRA Paper 15309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2012. "Defining and financing an intermodal USO," Working Papers 0035, Swiss Economics.
    9. Knieps, Günter, 2006. "The different role of mandatory access in German regulation of railroads and telecommunications," Discussion Papers 104 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    10. Knieps, Günter, 2005. "Competition in the post-trade markets: A network economic analysis of the securities business," Discussion Papers 101 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    11. Blankart, Charles B. & Knieps, Günter & Zenhäusern, Patrick, 2007. "Regulation of new markets in telecommunications? Market dynamics and shrinking monopolistic bottlenecks," Discussion Papers 112 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    12. Knieps, Günter, 2004. "Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach," Discussion Papers 100, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    13. Matthias Finger & Christian Jaag & Markus Lang & Martin Lutzenberger & Urs Trinkner, 2009. "Bestimmung des Regulierungsbedarfs aus ökonomischer Sicht: Angemessenheit und Folgen einer funktionalen oder strukturellen Trennung von Swisscom," Studies and Reports, Swiss Economics, pages 1-92, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Wholesale, retail pricing in telecom markets," Discussion Papers 84, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    2. Knieps, Günter, 2006. "The different role of mandatory access in German regulation of railroads and telecommunications," Discussion Papers 104 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    3. Knieps, Günter, 2004. "Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach," Discussion Papers 100, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    4. Gabelmann, Anne, 2001. "Regulating European telecommunications markets: Unbundled access to the local loop outside urban areas," Discussion Papers 81, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    5. Knieps, Günter, 2008. "The net neutrality debate and the German communications and competition law," Discussion Papers 120, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    6. Knieps, Günter, 2005. "Competition in the post-trade markets: A network economic analysis of the securities business," Discussion Papers 101 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    7. Eli M. NOAM, 2011. "Beyond Net Neutrality: End-User Sovereignty," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(84), pages 153-173, 4th quart.
    8. Madden, Gary & Bohlin, Erik & Ahmad, Hasnat & Tran, Thien, 2013. "OECD unbundled local loop pricing," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1033-1045.
    9. Klaus S. Friesenbichler, 2021. "What Explains Aggregate Telecom Investments? Evidence From an EU-OECD Panel," WIFO Working Papers 583, WIFO.
    10. Brunekreeft, G. & Twelemann, S., 2005. "Regulation, Competition and Investment in the German Electricity Market: RegTP or REGTP," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0501, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Buchmann, Marius, 2017. "Governance of data and information management in smart distribution grids: Increase efficiency by balancing coordination and competition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 63-72.
    12. Gert Brunekreeft, 2002. "Regulation and Third-Party Discrimination in the German Electricity Supply Industry," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 203-220, May.
    13. Christian Von Hirschhausen, 2006. "Reform de"r Erdgaswirtschaft in der EU und in Deutschland: Wie viel Regulierung braucht der Wettbewerb?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(1), pages 89-103, February.
    14. Hense, Andreas, 2005. "Gasmarktregulierung in Europa: Ansätze, Erfahrungen und mögliche Implikationen für das deutsche Regulierungsmodell," WIK Discussion Papers 263, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    15. Hense, Andreas & Schäffner, Daniel, 2004. "Regulatorische Aufgaben im Energiebereich – ein europäischer Vergleich," WIK Discussion Papers 254, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    16. Knieps, Günter & Weiß, Hans-Jörg, 2007. "Reduction of regulatory risk: a network economic approach," Discussion Papers 117, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    17. Günter Knieps, 2004. "Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 1188, CESifo.
    18. Franz, Oliver & Schäffner, Daniel & Trage, Bastian, 2005. "Grundformen der Entgeltregulierung: Vor- und Nachteile von Price-Cap, Revenue-Cap und hybriden Ansätzen," WIK Discussion Papers 267, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    19. Jürgen Janger, 2005. "Sectoral Regulation in Austria before and after EU Accession — The Network Industries as a Case in Point," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 2, pages 178-195.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:aluivr:88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wffrede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.