IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa06p641.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Turkey's Rurality: A Comparative Analysis At the EU Level

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Nijkamp
  • Tuzin Baycan Levent
  • Aliye Ahu Gulumser

Abstract

The future of Europe’s rural peripheries as well as the future of rural societies is one of the most important development and planning issues of the EU. Several typologies of rural areas and different rural development indicators have been developed by researchers and international organizations such as OECD and EU to better understand the dynamics of rural areas and to develop relevant policies for these areas. The typologies of rural areas are based on sub-national territories and administrative or statistical units (i.e. local, regional, NUTS3, NUTS5), whereas rural development indicators include a wide range of indicators from population and migration to economic structure and performance and from social well-being and equity to environment and sustainability. Against this background, the aim of this paper is to compare and evaluate Turkey’s rurality with the EU-25 countries on the basis of rural development indicators. The data and information used for comparison and evaluation are based on EUROSTAT data. A multicriteria analysis technique, factor analysis is deployed to define Turkey’s rurality in the European context. To map out the characteristics and dynamics of Turkey’s rurality may also help to develop relevant policies for rural development of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Nijkamp & Tuzin Baycan Levent & Aliye Ahu Gulumser, 2006. "Turkey's Rurality: A Comparative Analysis At the EU Level," ERSA conference papers ersa06p641, European Regional Science Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa06/papers/641.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Blunden & W. T. R. Pryce & Peter Dreyer, 1998. "The Classification of Rural Areas in the European Context: An Exploration of a Typology Using Neural Network Applications," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 149-160.
    2. Dimitris Ballas & Thanasis Kalogeresis & Lois Labrianidis, 2003. "A comparative study of typologies for rural areas in Europe," ERSA conference papers ersa03p515, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Eric Vaz & Teresa de Noronha, 2020. "Sustainable Development in Southern Europe," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-662-62177-6, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gulumser, Aliye Ahu & Baycan Levent, Tuzin & Nijkamp, Peter, 2007. "Changing trends in rural self-employment in Europe," Serie Research Memoranda 0017, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. D'Amico, Mario & Coppola, Adele & Chinnici, Gaetano & Di Vita, Giuseppe & Pappalardo, Gioacchino, 2012. "EU Agricultural Systems in the new CAP perspectives," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126116, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viñas Carmen Delgado, 2019. "Depopulation Processes in European Rural Areas: A Case Study of Cantabria (Spain)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 341-369, September.
    2. Lukić Aleksandar, 2013. "Tourism, Farm Diversification and Plurality of Rurality: Case Study of Croatia," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 356-376, December.
    3. Longjiao Wen & Zhenzhen Liu & Zhifeng Gao & Saeid Khanjari, 2022. "Evolutionary Path and Mechanism of Village Revitalization: A Case Study of Yuejin Village, Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Pienaar, Louw & Traub, Lulama, 2015. "Understanding the smallholder farmer in South Africa: Towards a sustainable livelihoods classification," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212633, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. G. Tappeiner & H. W. Holub & U. Tappeiner & J. Aschenwald, 2002. "The Classification of Rural Areas in the European Context: Some Remarks on the Article of J. R. Blunden, W. T. R. Pryce and P. Dreyer, Regional Studies 32(2)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 157-160.
    6. Hua Qin & Courtney G. Flint, 2017. "Changing Community Variations in Perceptions and Activeness in Response to the Spruce Bark Beetle Outbreak in Alaska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Tagesse A. Melketo & Endrias Geta & Stefan Sieber, 2021. "Understanding Livelihood Diversification Patterns among Smallholder Farm Households in Southern Ethiopia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Camaioni, Beatrice & Esposti, Roberto & Lobianco, Antonello & Pagliacci, Francesco & Sotte, Franco, 2013. "How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(3), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Depraz, Samuel, 2008. "Czy Powstanie Międzynarodowa Definicja Obszaru Wiejskiego W Europie?," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 2(139).
    10. Gregory D Breetzke & Andre C Horn, 2009. "A Geodemographic Profiler for High Offender Propensity Areas in the City of Tshwane, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 112-127, January.
    11. Gulumser, Aliye Ahu & Baycan Levent, Tuzin & Nijkamp, Peter, 2007. "Changing trends in rural self-employment in Europe," Serie Research Memoranda 0017, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. D'Amico, Mario & Coppola, Adele & Chinnici, Gaetano & Di Vita, Giuseppe & Pappalardo, Gioacchino, 2012. "EU Agricultural Systems in the new CAP perspectives," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126116, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Alasia, Alessandro, 2004. "Mapping the Socio-economic Diversity of Rural Canada: A Multivariate Analysis," Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series 28048, Statistics Canada.
    14. Aleksandra Gajić & Nikola Krunić & Branko Protić, 2021. "Classification of Rural Areas in Serbia: Framework and Implications for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Zehong Li & Xinran Miao & Mengyuan Wang & Shuguang Jiang & Yuxian Wang, 2022. "The Classification and Regulation of Mountain Villages in the Context of Rural Revitalization—The Example of Zhaotong, Yunnan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Yogi Vidyattama & Robert Tanton & Binod Nepal, 2013. "The Effect of Transport Costs on Housing-related Financial Stress in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1779-1795, July.
    17. Ángela Engelmo Moriche & Ana Nieto Masot & Julián Mora Aliseda, 2021. "Economic Sustainability of Touristic Offer Funded by Public Initiatives in Spanish Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Esposti, R. & Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F. & Camaioni, Beatrice & Lobianco, A., 2013. "How rural the EU RDP is? An analysis through spatial funds allocation," 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy 149900, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    19. Yaojin Zhou & Yao Shen & Xuexi Yang & Zhifang Wang & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Where to Revitalize, and How? A Rural Typology Zoning for China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Cyriac, Susan & Firoz C, Mohammed, 2022. "Dichotomous classification and implications in spatial planning: A case of the Rural-Urban Continuum settlements of Kerala, India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.