IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/739.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Longitudinal statistical matching: transferring consumption expenditure from HBS to SILC panel survey

Author

Listed:
  • Baris Ucar
  • Gianni Betti

Abstract

The aim of this study is to look for an appropriate procedure to conduct statistical matching for longitudinal data sets. To our knowledge, among the studies, which are associated to statistical matching with longitudinal data, no such issue has been specifically covered or identified in literature. The longitudinal data set, which is used in this study, involves a longitudinal weight at individual level, which requires further procedures before the matching application. The study will discuss and propose ways to deal with the statistical matching issue for such data sets. In the process, a four-year longitudinal data set is used and data from each year is matched with a cross-sectional data set for the corresponding year. The matching procedure is comprised of two steps, respectively the Renssen (1998) method followed by nearest neighbor distance hot deck matching, proposed by D’Orazio (2016) and Donatiello et al. (2015). The application is undertaken on Turkish data to impute consumption expenditure variable from Household Budget Survey (HBS) to Statistics on Income, and Living Conditions (SILC) Survey. A synthetic longitudinal data set is created by using these two survey data sets. The two data sets have many variables in common including income variable, which enables Conditional Independence Assumption (CIA) to be more likely. The study also carries out validation analyses to determine the quality of the matching procedures and the findings achieved with the proposed itinerary, indicate that the distribution of consumption expenditure estimate in synthetic data set is well preserved with all estimates. The poverty indicators in general and at household level is also looked for and the results indicate a good quality match

Suggested Citation

  • Baris Ucar & Gianni Betti, 2016. "Longitudinal statistical matching: transferring consumption expenditure from HBS to SILC panel survey," Department of Economics University of Siena 739, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/739.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Joachim, 2002. "The causal effects of exports on firm size and labor productivity: first evidence from a matching approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 287-292, October.
    2. Fougère, Denis & Crépon, Bruno & Brodaty, Thomas, 2000. "Using Matching Estimators to Evaluate Alternative Youth Employment Programs: Evidence from France, 1986-1988," CEPR Discussion Papers 2604, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Rubin, Donald B, 1986. "Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation with Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 4(1), pages 87-94, January.
    4. Radner, Daniel B, 1981. "An Example of the Use of Statistical Matching in the Estimation and Analysis of the Size Distribution of Income," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 27(3), pages 211-242, September.
    5. Anika Rasner & Ralf K. Himmelreicher & Markus M. Grabka & Joachim R. Frick, 2007. "Best of Both Worlds: Preparatory Steps in Matching Survey Data with Administrative Pension Records ; The Case of the German Socio-Economic Panel and the Scientific Use File Completed Insurance Biograp," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 70, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Thomas Masterson, 2013. "Quality of Statistical Match and Simulations Used in the Estimation of the Levy Institute Measure of Time and Consumption Poverty (LIMTCP) for Turkey in 2006," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_769, Levy Economics Institute.
    7. Lisa Keister, 2003. "Sharing the wealth: The effect of siblings on adults’ wealth ownership," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(3), pages 521-542, August.
    8. Gabriella Donatiello & Marcello D’Orazio & Doriana Frattarola & Antony Rizzi & Mauro Scanu & Mattia Spaziani, 2014. "Statistical Matching of Income and Consumption Expenditures," International Journal of Economic Sciences, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(3), pages 50-65.
    9. Gabriella Donatiello & Marcello D'Orazio & Doriana Frattarola & Antony Rizzi & Mauro Scanu & Mattia Spaziani, 2014. "Statistical matching of income and consumption expenditures," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0100965, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    10. Anika Rasner & Joachim R. Frick & Markus M. Grabka, 2011. "Extending the Empirical Basis for Wealth Inequality Research Using Statistical Matching of Administrative and Survey Data," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 359, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    11. Daniel B. Radner, 1981. "An Example Of The Use Of Statistical Matching In The Estimation And Analysis Of The Size Distribution Of Income," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 27(3), pages 211-242, September.
    12. Massimo Baldini & Daniele Pacifico & Federica Termini, 2015. "Imputation of missing expenditure information in standard household income surveys," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0116, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    13. Massimo Baldini & Daniele Pacifico & Federica Termini, 2015. "Imputation of missing expenditure information in standard household income surveys," Department of Economics 0049, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    14. Daphne Greenwood, 1983. "An Estimation Of U.S. Family Wealth And Its Distribution From Microdata, 1973," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 29(1), pages 23-44, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ozlem Albayrak & Thomas Masterson, 2017. "Quality of Statistical Match of Household Budget Survey and SILC for Turkey," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_885, Levy Economics Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Cirillo & Lucia Imperioli & Marco Manzo, 2021. "The Value Added Tax Simulation Model: VATSIM-DF (II)," Working Papers wp2021-12, Ministry of Economy and Finance, Department of Finance.
    2. Peter ven de Ven & Anne Harrison & Barbara Fraumeni & Dennis Fixler & David Johnson & Andrew Craig & Kevin Furlong, 2017. "A Consistent Data Series to Evaluate Growth and Inequality in the National Accounts Note: The views expressed in this research, including those related to statistical, methodological, technical, or op," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63, pages 437-459, December.
    3. Lamarche, Pierre, 2017. "Estimating consumption in the HFCS: Experimental results on the first wave of the HFCS," Statistics Paper Series 22, European Central Bank.
    4. Marcello D’Orazio, 2015. "Integration and imputation of survey data in R: the StatMatch package," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 63(2), pages 57-68, June.
    5. Clinton P. McCully, 2013. "Integration of Micro and Macro Data on Consumer Income and Expenditures," BEA Working Papers 0101, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    6. Andrea Cutillo & Mauro Scanu, 2020. "A Mixed Approach for Data Fusion of HBS and SILC," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 411-437, July.
    7. D'Alberto, Riccardo & Zavalloni, Matteo & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2021. "A Statistical Matching approach to reproduce the heterogeneity of willingness to pay in benefit transfer," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Teixidó, Jordi J. & Verde, Stefano F., 2017. "Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive in the Twenty-First Century? Taking Wealth into Account," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 109-125.
    9. Nicola Curci & Marco Savegnago, 2019. "Shifting taxes from labour to consumption: the efficiency-equity trade-off," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1244, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    10. Edward C. Budd & Daniel Radner & T. Cameron Whiteman, 1984. "An Accounting Framework for Transfer Payments and Its Implications for the Size Distribution of Income," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Transfers in the United States, pages 37-86, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Rasner, Anika & Frick, Joachim R. & Grabka, Markus M., 2013. "Statistical Matching of Administrative and Survey Data: An Application to Wealth Inequality Analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 192-224.
    12. Esposito Laura & Fioroni Livia & Guandalini Alessio, 2019. "Gross income projection in Labour Force Survey Data," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 73(4), pages 41-52, October-D.
    13. Bimo Wijayanto & Yogi Vidyattama, 2017. "Revenue and Distributional Impact Analysis of Indonesian Personal Income Tax Reform in 2008," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, vol. 63, pages 97-113, December.
    14. Luca Gandullia & Lucia Leporatti, 2019. "Distributional effects of gambling taxes: empirical evidence from Italy," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(4), pages 565-590, December.
    15. Anika Rasner & Joachim R. Frick & Markus M. Grabka, 2013. "Statistical Matching of Administrative and Survey Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 42(2), pages 192-224, May.
    16. François Gardes, 2021. "On the value of time and human life," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 21023, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    17. François Gardes, 2021. "A Solution to the Estimation of an Enlarged GDP Including Domestic Production: An Estimation on Micro Data," Post-Print halshs-03325362, HAL.
    18. Ea Hoppe Blaabæk & Mads Meier Jæger & Joseph Molitoris, 2020. "Family Size and Educational Attainment: Cousins, Contexts, and Compensation," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 575-600, July.
    19. Joost Ginkel & Pieter Kroonenberg, 2014. "Using Generalized Procrustes Analysis for Multiple Imputation in Principal Component Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(2), pages 242-269, July.
    20. Richard Disney & Eleonora Fischera & Trudy Owens, 2010. "Has the Introduction of Microfinance Crowded-out Informal Loans in Malawi?," Discussion Papers 10/08, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Statistical matching; Consumption Expenditure; SILC; Household Budget Survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C19 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Other
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Becatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.