IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upj/weupjo/09-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating a Performance Standards Adjustment Model for Workforce Programs that Provides Timely Feedback and Uses Data from Only One State

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy J. Bartik

    (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)

  • Randall W. Eberts

    (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)

  • Ken Kline

    (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a methodology for adjusting performance standards for workforce programs offered by local workforce areas (LWAs). By performance standards adjustment, we mean a model that uses a statistical approach to attempt to better measure the relative performance of different local workforce areas in providing workforce system customers with “value added” in terms of the system’s desired outcomes. Our paper’s approach has four distinguishing features. First, the performance standards are based on the common measures proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor, which include short- and longer-term employment outcomes. Second, the model is estimated using data from only one state, which allows each state greater flexibility in adapting the adjustment model to the state’s needs and available data. Third, the model is estimated using data on individual customers, which offers some estimation advantages, particularly when data from only one state is available. Fourth, since some of the common measures are not available until long after the program year is completed, we include real-time predictions of the current performance of the LWA and an assessment of whether or not it will meet its performance standards when the common measure data is eventually available. This more timely feedback on performance provides administrators the opportunity to better manage their operations and offer services that best meet the needs of their customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy J. Bartik & Randall W. Eberts & Ken Kline, 2009. "Estimating a Performance Standards Adjustment Model for Workforce Programs that Provides Timely Feedback and Uses Data from Only One State," Upjohn Working Papers 09-144, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:upj:weupjo:09-144
    Note: This paper formed the basis for a performance reporting system that was developed for the State of Michigan. The system is referred to as the “Value-Added Performance Improvement System” (VAPIS) and has been implemented for more than a year. The system adjusts the U.S. Department of Labor’s common measures for WIA workforce programs for factors that are beyond the control of local administrators, such as the characteristics of program participants and local labor market conditions. The common measures include three labor market outcomes: entered employment, job retention, and earnings levels. By making these adjustments, the common measures more closely approximate the value added that the workforce programs contribute to the labor market outcomes of participants. VAPIS also provides a short-term forecasting component that assists local workforce administrators in understanding the likelihood of that their current participants will find and retain jobs. Because of the long lag in reporting common measures, local administrators have little systematic knowledge of their performance. VAPIS tries to fill that gap.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1161&context=up_workingpapers
    Download Restriction: This material is copyrighted. Permission is required to reproduce any or all parts.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy J. Bartik, 2001. "Jobs for the Poor: Can Labor Demand Policies Help?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number tjb2001, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji-Whan Yun, 2011. "Unbalanced Development: The Origin of Korea's Self-Employment Problem from a Comparative Perspective," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 786-803.
    2. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman & M. Rose Olfert & Ying Tan, 2015. "When Spatial Equilibrium Fails: Is Place-Based Policy Second Best?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1303-1325, August.
    3. Coralie Perez, 2002. "Le nouvel avatar de la politique d'emploi américaine : le Workforce Investment Act," Post-Print halshs-00417939, HAL.
    4. Brian E. Whitacre & David Shideler & Randi Williams, 2016. "Do Incentive Programs Cause Growth? The Case of the Oklahoma Quality Jobs Program and Community-Level Economic Growth," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(1), pages 62-74, February.
    5. Timothy J. Bartik, 2009. "The Revitalization of Older Industrial Cities: A Review Essay of Retooling for Growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 1-29, March.
    6. David Neumark & Diego Grijalva, 2017. "The Employment Effects of State Hiring Credits," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 70(5), pages 1111-1145, October.
    7. Hamersma, Sarah, 2003. "The Work Opportunity and Welfare–to–Work Tax Credits: Participation Rates Among Eligible Workers," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(4), pages 725-738, December.
    8. Linda Lobao & P. Wilner Jeanty & Mark Partridge & David Kraybill, 2012. "Poverty and Place across the United States," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(2), pages 158-187, April.
    9. Mark Partridge & Dan Rickman, 2010. "Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Modelling for Regional Economic Development Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1311-1328.
    10. Timothy J. Bartik, 2007. "Solving the Problems of Economic Development Incentives," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Ann Markusen (ed.), Reining in the Competition for Capital, chapter 5, pages 103-139, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    11. Olugbenga Ajilore, 2012. "Did the Work Opportunity Tax Credit Cause Subsidized Worker Substitution?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(3), pages 231-237, August.
    12. Pérez Pérez Jorge & Suher Michael, 2020. "The Efficacy of Hiring Credits in Distressed Areas," Working Papers 2020-05, Banco de México.
    13. Timothy J. Bartik, 2020. "Targeting Jobs Toward The People Who Need Them," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 854-857, June.
    14. Rishi R. Sharma, 2017. "Taxing and Subsidizing Foreign Investors," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 73(4), pages 402-423, December.
    15. Timothy J. Bartik, 2002. "Thinking about Local Living Wage Requirements," Upjohn Working Papers 02-76, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    16. Ku, Hyejin & Schönberg, Uta & Schreiner, Ragnhild C., 2020. "Do place-based tax incentives create jobs?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Harry J. Holzer & Michael A. Stoll, 2003. "Employer Demand for Welfare Recipients by Race," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 210-241, January.
    18. Stephan J Goetz & Mark D Partridge & Dan S Rickman & Shibalee Majumdar, 2011. "Sharing the Gains of Local Economic Growth: Race-to-the-Top versus Race-to-the-Bottom Economic Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(3), pages 428-456, June.
    19. Timothy J. Bartik, 2000. "Solving the Many Problems with Inner City Jobs," Upjohn Working Papers 00-66, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    20. Timothy J. Bartik, "undated". "Increasing the Economic Development Benefits of Higher Education in Michigan," Upjohn Working Papers tjb2005jwd, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    performance standards; workforce programs; local labor markets; vapis; model; michigan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J64 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
    • J68 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upj:weupjo:09-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/upjohus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.