This paper examines the segregative properties of endogenous processes of jurisdiction formation à la Tiebout in the presence of a central government who makes equalization transfers to jurisdictions in such a way as to maximize a welfarist objective. Choice of location by households, of local public good provision by jurisdictions, and of equalization grants and tax by the central government are assumed to be made simultaneously, taking the choices of others as given. Two welfarist objectives for the central government are considered in turn: Leximin and Utilitarianism. If the central government pursues a Leximin objective, it is easily shown that the only stable jurisdiction structures that can emerge are those in which the jurisdictions' poorest households have all the same wealth. A richer class of stable jurisdiction structures are compatible with a central utilitarian government. Yet, it so happens that, if individual preferences are additively separable, the class of households preferences that garantee the segregation of any stable jurisdiction structure remains unchanged by the presence of a central government.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: