This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Decentralisation vs fiscal federalism in the presence of impure public goods

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rosella Levaggi

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The traditional theory for fiscal federalism assumes that the lower tier is more efficient in producing local public goods because of information asymmetry, while on the finance side Central Government might be more efficient in raising resources that can be redistributed through grants-in-aid. This scheme does not take into account that services produced at local level are usually impure public goods. The model developed in this paper allows to derive grants-in aid distribution formulae in this environment and a set of rules that allows to establish when fiscal federalism is a superior alternative to decentralisation.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.unibs.it/on-line/dse/Home/Ricerca/Paperdeldipartimento/documento9733.html
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Brescia, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 0812.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ubs:wpaper:0812

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Via S. Faustino 74/B, 25122 Brescia
Phone: +39-(0)30-2988704
Web page: http://www.unibs.it/atp/page.1019.0.0.0.atp?node=224
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Matteo Galizzi).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Akai, Nobuo & Mikami, Kazuhiko, 2006. "Fiscal decentralization and centralization under a majority rule: A normative analysis," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 41-55, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Tracy Snoddon & Jean-François Wen, 2003. "Grants structure in an intergovernmental fiscal game," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 115-126, 08. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. David Wildasin & James Marton, 2007. "Medicaid Expenditures and State Budgets: Past, Present, and Future," Working Papers 2007-04, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations. [Downloadable!]
  4. Breuille, Marie-Laure & Gary-Bobo, Robert J., 2007. "Sharing budgetary austerity under free mobility and asymmetric information: An optimal regulation approach to fiscal federalism," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 1177-1196, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Hikaru Ogawa & David Wildasin, 2007. "Think Locally, Act Locally: Spillovers, Spillbacks, and Efficient Decentralized Policymaking," Working Papers 2007-06, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 2700 working paper series are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.