'National Innovation Systems' theories are built upon the assumption that linkages among organisations matter to innovation. Specifically, proximity is a crucial factor in most of the explanations of regional innovation systems. Yet several thing, such as the rapid growth of the internet and email, suggest that the role of proximity could be breaking down, particularly for large firms with the financial resources to seek out knowledge anywhere in the world.However, the need to access tacit knowledge in rapidly evolving science-based technologies could counter the centrifugal features of modern communication technologies. This study examines the effect of proximity on the sourcing of knowledge by firms from suppliers, customers, joint ventures, competitors (via reverse engineering) and publicly-funded research organisations (PROs). The focus is on PROs, since they are an essential component of National Innovation Systems. Relevant data for up to 615 firms are available from the 1993 PACE survey of Europe's largest industrial firms. Descriptive results show that compared to four other information sources proximity effects are greatest for PROs. The factors that influence the importance of proximity to the use of information from PROs are explored through an ordered logit model. The dependent variable is the relative importance of domestic and foreign PROs. The independent variables include firm size, activity in foreign markets, R&D intensity, a proxy for codified knowledge, and two proxies for the quantity and quality of the scientific base of a country. The ordered logit model results show that proximity effects decline with an increase in the firm's R&D expenditures, the importance attached to basic research results in publications, and activity in the North American market, but increase with the quality and availability of outputs from domestic PROs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Sussex, SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research in its series SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series with number
73.
Find related papers by JEL classification: H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise O3 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cowan,Robin & Jonard,Nicolas, 2000.
"The Dynamics of Collective Invention,"
Research Memoranda
018, Maastricht : MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Hagedoorn, John & Link, Albert N. & Vonortas, Nicholas S., 2000.
"Research partnerships1,"
Research Policy,
Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 567-586, April.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Stéphane Lhuillery, 2005.
"Organisation and location of academic sourcing at the firm level,"
CEMI Working Papers
cemi-report-2005-001, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Collège du Management de la Technologie, Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship Institute, Chaire en Economie et Management de l'Innovation.
[Downloadable!]