IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/spo/wpmain/infohdl2441-7o37b1vm588d3o8dohskubesai.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les déterminants de la redistribution monétaire, une analyse en comparaison internationale

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Amoureux

    (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques)

  • Elvire Guillaud

    (Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne (CNRS/UP 1))

  • Michael Zemmour

    (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

Dans le présent travail, en nous appuyant sur une base de données précédemment construite, nous cherchons à obtenir une image précise de la redistribution opérée par les différents pays de notre échantillon. La première partie caractérise la réduction des inégalités obtenue par les différents Etats : nous identifions les Etats qui adoptent une stratégie ciblée sur la réduction de la pauvreté, et ceux qui appliquent une stratégie plus générale d'égalisation des revenus tout au long de la distribution. La seconde partie explore la structure des systèmes de prélèvements obligatoires directs sur les ménages. Nous analysons en particulier le rôle des cotisations sociales dans la capacité redistributive du système, ainsi que les analogues structurelles que l'on retrouve d'un pays à l'autre. Un note finale compare les résultats que nous obtenons avec ceux d'une étude récente menée par une autre équipe de recherche, concernant la redistribution effective des systèmes socio-fiscaux de la France et des Etats-Unis.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michael Zemmour, 2019. "Les déterminants de la redistribution monétaire, une analyse en comparaison internationale," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/7o37b1vm588, Sciences Po.
    • Handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7o37b1vm588d3o8dohskubesai
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/7o37b1vm588d3o8dohskubesai/resources/liepp-en3s-report-2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Saez & Joel Slemrod & Seth H. Giertz, 2012. "The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 3-50, March.
    2. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2014. "Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 6(1), pages 230-271, February.
    3. Ilyana Kuziemko & Michael I. Norton & Emmanuel Saez & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2015. "How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1478-1508, April.
    4. Elvire Guillaud & Matthew Olckers & Michaël Zemmour, 2020. "Four Levers of Redistribution: The Impact of Tax and Transfer Systems on Inequality Reduction," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(2), pages 444-466, June.
    5. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2007. "How Progressive is the U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and International Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 3-24, Winter.
    6. Antoine Bozio & Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Malka Guillot & Thomas Piketty, 2018. "Inequality and Redistribution in France, 1990-2018: Evidence from Post-Tax Distributional National Accounts (DINA)," Working Papers hal-02878151, HAL.
    7. Antoine Bozio & Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Malka Guillot & Thomas Piketty, 2019. "Inequality and redistribution in France, 1990-2018: evidence from post-tax distributional national accounts," Post-Print halshs-02353431, HAL.
    8. Louis Chauvel, 2016. "The Intensity and Shape of Inequality: The ABG Method of Distributional Analysis," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(1), pages 52-68, March.
    9. Gerlinde Verbist & Francesco Figari, 2014. "The Redistributive Effect and Progressivity of Taxes Revisited: An International Comparison across the European Union," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 70(3), pages 405-429, September.
    10. Antoine Bozio & Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret & Malka Guillot & Thomas Piketty, 2018. "Inequality and Redistribution in France," Post-Print halshs-01984502, HAL.
    11. Lupu, Noam & Pontusson, Jonas, 2011. "The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(2), pages 316-336, May.
    12. Peter Lindert, 2004. "Social Spending and Economic Growth," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 6-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7o37b1vm588d3o8dohskubesai is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour & Thomas Breda & Laurent Caussat & Janet C Gornick Vi & Bruno Palier, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale 1," Working Papers hal-03526560, HAL.
    3. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale," Working Papers hal-03471417, HAL.
    4. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour & Thomas Breda & Laurent Caussat & Janet C Gornick Vi & Bruno Palier, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale 1," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03526560, HAL.
    5. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03471417, HAL.
    6. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour & Thomas Breda & Laurent Caussat & Janet C Gornick Vi & Bruno Palier, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale 1," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03526560, HAL.
    7. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2019. "L'impact redistributif des modèles socio-fiscaux de protection sociale : analyse comparée internationale," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03471417, HAL.
    8. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2012. "Optimal Labor Income Taxation," NBER Working Papers 18521, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Bertrand Garbinti & Jonathan Goupille-Lebret, 2019. "Inégalités de revenus et de richesse en France : évolutions et liens sur longue période," Working Papers halshs-02401482, HAL.
    10. Victor Amoureux & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2019. "It Takes Two to Tango Income and Payroll Taxes in Progressive Tax Systems," Working Papers hal-02735278, HAL.
    11. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Matthieu Lequien & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2017. "Tax Simplicity and Heterogeneous Learning," NBER Working Papers 24049, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Windsteiger, Lisa, 2022. "The redistributive consequences of segregation and misperceptions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Enrico Rubolino & Daniel Waldenström, 2020. "Tax progressivity and top incomes evidence from tax reforms," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 18(3), pages 261-289, September.
    14. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(2), pages 553-609.
    15. Salvatore Morelli & Timothy Smeeding & Jeffrey Thompson, 2014. "Post-1970 Trends in Within-Country Inequality and Poverty: Rich and Middle Income Countries," CSEF Working Papers 356, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    16. Garbinti, Bertrand & Goupille-Lebret, Jonathan & Piketty, Thomas, 2018. "Income inequality in France, 1900–2014: Evidence from Distributional National Accounts (DINA)," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 63-77.
    17. Hope, David & Limberg, Julian & Weber, Nina, 2023. "Why do (some) ordinary Americans support tax cuts for the rich? Evidence from a randomised survey experiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Kaymak, Barış & Poschke, Markus, 2016. "The evolution of wealth inequality over half a century: The role of taxes, transfers and technology," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-25.
    19. Choi, Gwangeun, 2019. "Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 220-244.
    20. Bargain, Olivier & Dolls, Mathias & Immervoll, Herwig & Neumann, Dirk & Peichl, Andreas & Pestel, Nico & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2013. "Partisan Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the U.S., 1979-2007," IZA Discussion Papers 7190, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Hope, David & Limberg, Julian & Weber, Nina Sophie, 2021. "Why Do (Some) Ordinary Americans Support Tax Cuts for the Rich? Evidence From a Randomized Survey Experiment," SocArXiv chk9b, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7o37b1vm588d3o8dohskubesai. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Spire @ Sciences Po Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecspofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.