IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-177099.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research

Author

Listed:
  • Koen Tackx
  • Paul Verdin

Abstract

In this article, we propose co-creation as a more efficient and effective way of formulating and implementing strategy. We rely on the foundations of procedural justice theory which states that when a decision making process is considered as “fair”, people to whom the process is applied demonstrate a higher level of trust and commitment. A fair process implies that people can voice their opinion and feel part of a group. These two requirements are often not considered enough in “traditional” strategy processes. We identify co-creation as a tool to address the fair process requirements of being heard and belong to a community. Taking these requirements into account will improve both the strategy formulation (e.g. because more and better ideas are generated) and the strategy implementation (e.g. because of a larger buy-in of middle management). Using an exploratory co-creation research setting we explored to what extent corporations are actually following fair process principles in their strategy creation process and what is their appetite for strategy co-creation. From this test, it appeared that major concerns exist with respect to the current strategy creation process and a strong desire to introduce co-creation principles and techniques in that process. Finally, we propose a conceptual model explaining how fair process can be applied through co-creation and lead to improved strategy selection and implementation. As such, we aim to contribute to the analyses of the drivers, the potential and the application of an “open strategy” approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Koen Tackx & Paul Verdin, 2014. "Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research," Working Papers CEB 14-027, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/177099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/177099/1/wp14027.pdf
    File Function: wp14027
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Verdin & E. Cabocel & J. Celens & F. Faelli, 2011. "Making Change Work. What Managers, Executives and Staff Tell us that Really Matters," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 56(2), pages 244-270, June.
    2. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    3. Paul Verdin & Nick Heck, 2001. "From Local Champions To Global Masters," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-51432-4.
    4. Peter J. Brews & Michelle R. Hunt, 1999. "Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(10), pages 889-913, October.
    5. R. Whittington & Ludovic Cailluet & B. Yakis-Douglas, 2011. "Opening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession," Post-Print halshs-00738389, HAL.
    6. P. Verdin & E. Cabocel & J. Celens & F. Faelli, 2011. "Making Change Work. What Managers, Executives and Staff Tell us that Really Matters," Review of Business and Economic Literature, Intersentia, vol. 0(2), pages 244-270, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koen Tackx & Ludo Van der Heyden & Paul Verdin, 2016. "Fairness in Strategy: A Fair Process Evaluation of Strategy Schools," Working Papers CEB 16-031, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Caldart, Adrian A. & Ricart, Joan E., 2006. "A formal evaluation of the performance of different corporate styles in stable and turbulent environments," IESE Research Papers D/621, IESE Business School.
    3. Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Post-Print halshs-00675772, HAL.
    4. Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(3), pages 23-40, September.
    5. Subeika Rizvi & Shahid Querishi & ErumZaidi & Muhammad Ali Saeed, 2018. "The Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Use Of Effectuation And Relation With Perceived Financial Performanceand Innovation In The Firm," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-12.
    6. Subeika Rizvi & Shahid Querishi & ErumZaidi & Muhammad Ali Saeed, 2018. "The Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Use Of Effectuation And Relation With Perceived Financial Performanceand Innovation In The Firm," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 10-22.
    7. Wayland, Rebecca, 2019. "Three senses of paradigm in scenario methodology: A preliminary framework and systematic approach for using intuitive logics scenarios to change mental models and improve strategic decision-making in ," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 504-516.
    8. Rachel Maritz & Marius Pretorius & Kato Plant, 2011. "Exploring the Interface Between Strategy-Making and Responsible Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 101-113, January.
    9. Titus Jr., Varkey K. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P., 2011. "Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 446-453, May.
    10. Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2003. "Organizational time: a dialectical view," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp431, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    11. Vilà, Joaquim & Canales, Juan I., 2001. "Sequence of thinking and acting in strategy making," IESE Research Papers D/436, IESE Business School.
    12. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    13. Eren Durmus Ozdemir & Saime Mecikoglu, 2016. "A Case Study on Performance Implications of Hybrid Strategy in Automotive Supplier Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-43, June.
    14. Jean-Philippe Denis & Frank Tannery, 2002. "L'architecture des systèmes de contrôle de la stratégie dans les groupes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 69-114, September.
    15. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    16. Kozarkiewicz Alina, 2018. "Between it and Societal Shift: Preconditions of Open Strategizing," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 23(4), pages 3-8, December.
    17. Nikolay Mihaylov, 2016. "Practical Dimensions of the Debate Strategy vs Structure of Trace Group Hold AD," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 129-138.
    18. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    19. Mandy Mok Kim Man, 2009. "The Relationship between Distinctive Capabilities, Strategy Types, Environment and the Export Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises of the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 4(3), pages 205-223.
    20. Dariusz Sobotkiewicz, 2021. "Changes in the Strategies and Structures of Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations during the Covid 19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 723-736.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Procedural Justice; Fair Process; Strategy Creation; Strategy Implementation; Co-creation.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/177099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.