IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v6y2003iq3p23-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques

Author

Listed:
  • Hervé Goy

    (Université de Saint-Etienne)

Abstract

(VF)Cet article s'attache à l'étude des pratiques de planification de deux PME high-tech. En premier lieu, les informations récoltées auprès de Digigram illustrent plutôt une conception émergente de formation de la stratégie. En second lieu, la planification menée par Metrologic Group se rapproche davantage du courant rationaliste de formation de la stratégie. Au final, Metrologic Group comme Digigram sont deux sociétés en pleine réussite actuellement. Ce constat nous conduit naturellement, sans rejeter une construction théorique au profit de l'autre, à nous interroger sur les spécificités des démarches de planification au sein de ces deux entreprises.(VA)This article deals with the study of planning practices in two technological SME. First, information harvested with Digigram rather illustrates an emergent approach of strategy formation. Secondly, planning led by Metrologic Group nearer draws to the rationalist current of strategy making. At last, Metrologic Group as Digigram are two successful companies at present. This report naturally drives us, without throwing back a theoretical approach for the benefit of the other, to wonder about specificities of planning practices within these two companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(3), pages 23-40, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:6:y:2003:i:q3:p:23-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/063040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Sloman, 2008. "Principes d'économie," Post-Print hal-02189754, HAL.
    2. Peter J. Brews & Michelle R. Hunt, 1999. "Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(10), pages 889-913, October.
    3. Henry Mintzberg, 1990. "The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 171-195, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hervé Goy, 2003. "Entre émergence et rationalité, deux cas de pratiques de planification en PME technologiques," Post-Print halshs-00675772, HAL.
    2. Subeika Rizvi & Shahid Querishi & ErumZaidi & Muhammad Ali Saeed, 2018. "The Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Use Of Effectuation And Relation With Perceived Financial Performanceand Innovation In The Firm," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 14-12.
    3. Subeika Rizvi & Shahid Querishi & ErumZaidi & Muhammad Ali Saeed, 2018. "The Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Use Of Effectuation And Relation With Perceived Financial Performanceand Innovation In The Firm," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 14(1), pages 10-22.
    4. Wayland, Rebecca, 2019. "Three senses of paradigm in scenario methodology: A preliminary framework and systematic approach for using intuitive logics scenarios to change mental models and improve strategic decision-making in ," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 504-516.
    5. Koen Tackx & Paul Verdin, 2014. "Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research," Working Papers CEB 14-027, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Rachel Maritz & Marius Pretorius & Kato Plant, 2011. "Exploring the Interface Between Strategy-Making and Responsible Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 101-113, January.
    7. Caldart, Adrian A. & Ricart, Joan E., 2006. "A formal evaluation of the performance of different corporate styles in stable and turbulent environments," IESE Research Papers D/621, IESE Business School.
    8. Titus Jr., Varkey K. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P., 2011. "Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 446-453, May.
    9. Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2003. "Organizational time: a dialectical view," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp431, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    10. Vilà, Joaquim & Canales, Juan I., 2001. "Sequence of thinking and acting in strategy making," IESE Research Papers D/436, IESE Business School.
    11. Koen Tackx & Ludo Van der Heyden & Paul Verdin, 2016. "Fairness in Strategy: A Fair Process Evaluation of Strategy Schools," Working Papers CEB 16-031, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    13. Eren Durmus Ozdemir & Saime Mecikoglu, 2016. "A Case Study on Performance Implications of Hybrid Strategy in Automotive Supplier Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-43, June.
    14. Lim, Lewis K.S., 2013. "Mapping competitive prediction capability: Construct conceptualization and performance payoffs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1576-1586.
    15. Jean-Philippe Denis & Frank Tannery, 2002. "L'architecture des systèmes de contrôle de la stratégie dans les groupes," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 69-114, September.
    16. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    17. Nikolay Mihaylov, 2016. "Practical Dimensions of the Debate Strategy vs Structure of Trace Group Hold AD," Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, Eastern European Business and Economics Studies Centre, vol. 2(2), pages 129-138.
    18. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    19. Mandy Mok Kim Man, 2009. "The Relationship between Distinctive Capabilities, Strategy Types, Environment and the Export Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises of the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 4(3), pages 205-223.
    20. Hervé Goy & Robert Paturel, 2004. "Les problématiques de diagnostic et de projection dans les PMI," Post-Print halshs-00675774, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    planification; PME; environnement technologique; paradigmes stratégiques; planning; small business; high technology; strategic paradigms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O29 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:6:y:2003:i:q3:p:23-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.