Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Approximate Aggregation


Author Info

  • Eric R Young

    (Economics University of Virginia)


This paper revisits the approximate aggregation result of Krusell and Smith (1998). For the stochastic growth model with inelastic labor supply and uninsurable shocks to employment, those authors found that the mean was sufficient to forecast future prices; since prices are known functions of only aggregate capital, the fact that the mean evolves independently of the rest of the distribution rendered it the only relevant piece of information contained in the cross-sectional distribution. I compute the implications of the algorithm for many features of the cross-sectional distribution, finding that the model produces distributions which feature independent central moments. What this means is that the usual statement 'Only the Mean Matters' really should be augmented with the phrase 'for the Evolution of the Mean,' as the mean does not provide any useful information for those higher-order moments. Nonlinear statistics computed from the distribution barely depend on the mean and do not influence its evolution, so that again the mean fails to provide sufficient information to track all the implications of the model. I next consider the possibility of self-fulfilling equilibria, in which the idea that agents make decisions based on limited information that somehow results in only those variables mattering. I test this idea in two ways. First, holding the behavior of every agent constant except one (who is of measure zero), I consider whether that household could benefit in terms of forecasting accuracy by using the information contained in higher-order moments and statistics; I find that projecting the forecasting error on a wide spectrum of variables fails to uncover even one that has a signficant impact on the accuracy of the forecast for next period's mean. Second, I allow for some or all of the households in the economy to explicitly use those higher-order statistics for forecasting, again finding no argument for doing so. Even when only a fraction of households use additional information, so that their forecasts are statistically more accurate than the ones who do not, they do not tend to get systematically wealthier over time. These tests suggest strongly that self-fulfilling equilibria are not a feature of this economy. In the last section of the paper, I consider three economies in which there is cross-sectional heterogeneity in the marginal propensity to save out of wealth. Krusell and Smith (1998) point to the relative homogeneity of the MPS as an important feature for generating approximate aggregation. I show that homogeneity is not really sufficient, as each of the example economies feature large cross-sectional dispersion in MPS but nevertheless nearly aggregate. The key feature is rather a low amount of variation in this distribution over the business cycle -- in no economy does there occur significant movements in the distribution of MPS with respect to changes in the aggregate state

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found ( [307 Temporary Redirect]--> If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christopher F. Baum)
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 with number 141.

as in new window
Date of creation: 11 Nov 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:141

Contact details of provider:
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Aggregation; Approximation; Business Cycles;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Den Haan, Wouter, 2008. "Assessing the Accuracy of the Aggregate Law of Motion in Models with Heterogeneous Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 6971, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Yulei Luo & Liutang Gong & Heng-fu Zou, 2010. "A Note on Entrepreneurial Risk, Capital Market Imperfections, and Heterogeneity," CEMA Working Papers 409, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
  3. Rodolphe Buda, 2008. "Two Dimensional Aggregation Procedure: An Alternative to the Matrix Algebraic Algorithm," Computational Economics, Society for Computational Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 397-408, May.
  4. Ouyang, Min, 2009. "The scarring effect of recessions," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 184-199, March.
  5. Young, Eric R., 2010. "Solving the incomplete markets model with aggregate uncertainty using the Krusell-Smith algorithm and non-stochastic simulations," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 36-41, January.
  6. Olivier Allais & Wouter J Den Haan & Yann Algan, 2006. "Solving Heterogeneous-agent Models with Parameterized Cross-sectional Distributions," Sciences Po publications 2006 - 46, Sciences Po.
  7. Andrea Pescatori, 2007. "Incomplete markets and households’ exposure to interest rate and inflation risk: implications for the monetary policy maker," Working Paper 0709, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
  8. Francisco Covas & Shigeru Fujita, 2007. "Private risk premium and aggregate uncertainty in the model of uninsurable investment risk," Working Papers 07-30, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  9. Min Ouyang, 2006. "Plant Life Cycle and Aggregate Employment Dynamics," Working Papers 050632, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
  10. Bruce Preston & Mauro Roca, 2007. "Incomplete Markets, Heterogeneity and Macroeconomic Dynamics," NBER Working Papers 13260, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.