This paper shows that the R² and the standard error have fatal flaws and are inadequate as accuracy tests for models with heterogeneous agents and aggregate risk. Using data from a Krusell-Smith economy, I show that approximations for the law of motion of aggregate capital for which the true standard deviation of aggregate capital is up to 14% (119%) higher than the implied value (and which are thus clearly inaccurate) can have an R² as high as 0.9999 (0.99). Key in generating a more powerful test is to not update the aggregate law of motion with the aggregated simulated individual data, but to use as the explanatory variable the value predicted by the aggregate law of motion itself.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number
6971.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)