This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Learning And Adaptive Artificial Agents: An Analysis Of Evolutionary Economic Models

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Jie-Shin Lin (University of Manchester)
Chris Birchenhall
Abstract

The last years have been seen an extraordinary flourishing of works studying learning and adaptive behaviour in diverse fields. Following the fashion of computer innovation, there has been a growing interest in application to economic models of learning procedure developed in evolutionary computation tools such as genetic algorithms. Accordingly then, the use of computer simulation based on the related genetic algorithms (GAs) has largely taken by many researchers, for example, Axelord (1987), Marimon, McGrattan and Sargent (1990), Arifovic (1994, 1995a, 1995b), Arifovic and Eaton (1995), Dawid (1996a, 1996b), Birchenhall (1995), Birchenhall et al (1997), Bullard and Duffy (1997), Riechmann (1998, 1999), and Vriend (1998).We study a simple overlapping generation economy as an adaptive learning system. There are two populations co-existing in each period of time. A significant departure to representative agent in economic modelling is a release of hypothesis of perfect foresight or rational expectation. As a result, individual agents in the economy have heterogeneous beliefs concerning realisation of possible outcomes. With the existence of heterogeneity in the economy, actual outcome may or may not identical to any particular individual agent' expectation ex-ante. When the actual outcome feeds back to individual agents' beliefs, individual agents learn to correctly update their own beliefs. The learning is via a so-called genetic algorithm process.The framework proposed here is identical to the one considered in Bullard and Duffy (1998). Two prime questions raised are firstly the explanation of appearance of convergence to the Pareto superior equilibrium, and secondly how robust its convergence is to the changes in parameter value of the model, in particular, there are distinctions in two respects: within one learning scheme and between learning schemes. Moreover, we will look at what Vriend (1998) addressed a so-called "spite-effect"; in an economic setting, the effect of the economic forces might lead to significantly different results when applied computational tools between individual and social learning.We investigate performances of Holland's standard GA (SGA), Arifovic's augmented GA (AGA), and Birchenhall's selective transfer GA (STGA). Compared to modern artificial adaptive techniques, Maynard Smith's replicator model in its simple formulation highlighting the role of selection has been successfully applied in economics. In this study, the results from the replicator dynamics are compared to results of the related GAs above. In addition, we modify these learning algorithms. The results are compared to the results of their originals. Our work suggests that the stability of the Pareto superior equilibrium of the model is robust i.e. independent of the precise algorithm used. Finally, a further work for the study is necessary, even if it is a little speculative. While the learning schemes are not derived from an explicit behavioural model, one learning algorithm can be only described as a specific form of learning process. In other words, we ask which learning scheme agent will use population-wide when agent has many learning schemes available.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/cef00/papers/paper327.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 with number 327.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 05 Jul 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:327

Contact details of provider:
Postal: CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain
Fax: +34 93 542 17 46
Email:
Web page: http://enginy.upf.es/SCE/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Arifovic, Jasmina, 1995. "Genetic algorithms and inflationary economies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 219-243, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Blume, Lawrence E. & Easley, David, 1982. "Learning to be rational," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 340-351, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Arifovic, Jasmina & Eaton, Curtis, 1995. "Coordination via Genetic Learning," Computational Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 181-203, August.
    Other versions:
  4. Arifovic, Jasmina, 1996. "The Behavior of the Exchange Rate in the Genetic Algorithm and Experimental Economies," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(3), pages 510-41, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Riechmann, Thomas, 1998. "Genetic Algorithms and Economic Evolution," Diskussionspapiere der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Hannover dp-219, Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Marimon, R. & Mcgrattan, E. & Sargent, T.J., 1989. "Money As A Medium Of Exchange In An Economy With Artificially Intelligent Agents," Papers e-89-28, Stanford - Hoover Institution.
    Other versions:
  7. Selten,Reinhard, . "Evolution,learning and economic behaviour," Discussion Paper Serie B 132, University of Bonn, Germany.
    Other versions:
  8. Arifovic, Jasmina, 1994. "Genetic algorithm learning and the cobweb model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 3-28, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2000. "An illustration of the essential difference between individual and social learning, and its consequences for computational analyses," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Bullard, James & Duffy, John, 1999. "Using Genetic Algorithms to Model the Evolution of Heterogeneous Beliefs," Computational Economics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 41-60, February. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Herbert Dawid, 1996. "Learning of cycles and sunspot equilibria by Genetic Algorithms (*)," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 361-373.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.