IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rom/tadase/4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing Government Performance Indicators: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Phil KIM

    (Seoul National University, South Korea)

  • Tobin IM

    (Seoul National University, South Korea)

Abstract

National governments rely on global performance indicators to grasp the current status and to build future strategies. However, no previous study has investigated pathways to government performance in terms of various indices empirically. With five possible determinants that are trait competitiveness, change-oriented citizenship behavior (CO-OCB), public service motivation (PSM), organizational identification (OI), and corruption tolerance, we try to find sufficient configurations to three representative government performance indicators which are “Government Effectiveness” (WGI), “Government Efficiency” (GCI), and “Throughput” (GC). The results indicate that three performance indicators are distinguished from one another with regard to the number of contributing factors to sufficient configurations, the role of “innovation-inclined” factors, and the role of corruption tolerance.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil KIM & Tobin IM, 2019. "Comparing Government Performance Indicators: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis," TAD 14 The disciplines and the study of Public Administration: Transatlantic perspectives in the margin of the 14th Administration and Public Management International Conference, Bucharest, June 6-18 4, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:tadase:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccasp.ase.ro/TAD/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle C. Longest & Stephen Vaisey, 2008. "fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(1), pages 79-104, February.
    2. Blackburn, Keith & Forgues-Puccio, Gonzalo F., 2007. "Distribution and development in a model of misgovernance," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 1534-1563, August.
    3. Martin R Schneider & Conrad Schulze-Bentrop & Mihai Paunescu, 2010. "Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 246-266, February.
    4. Oliver Neumann & Adrian Ritz, 2015. "Public service motivation and rational choice modelling," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 365-370, September.
    5. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, September.
    6. Peter Mudrack & James Bloodgood & William Turnley, 2012. "Some Ethical Implications of Individual Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 347-359, July.
    7. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael A. Witt & Gregory Jackson, 2016. "Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(7), pages 778-806, September.
    2. Jantunen, Ari & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Chari, Simos & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 251-257.
    3. Russo, Ivan & Confente, Ilenia & Gligor, David M. & Autry, Chad W., 2016. "To be or not to be (loyal): Is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 888-896.
    4. Federica Nieri & Luciano Ciravegna & Ruth V. Aguilera & Elisa Giuliani, 2019. "Larger, more internationalized, better behaved? A configurational study of em erging market multinational enterprises' involvement in corporate wrongdoing," Discussion Papers 2019/255, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    5. Jin, Zhizhou & Zeng, Saixing & Chen, Hongquan & Shi, Jonathan Jingsheng, 2022. "Explaining the expansion performance in technological capability of participants in megaprojects: A configurational approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Borozan, Dj, 2022. "Detecting a structure in the European energy transition policy instrument mix: What mix successfully drives the energy transition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
    8. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Raggiotto, Francesco & Mason, Michela, 2018. "A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of satisfaction toward extreme sporting Events," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 358-368.
    9. Stroe, Silvia & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2018. "Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 265-272.
    10. Shockey, James W, 2021. "Social Aspects of COVID Mitigation," SocArXiv sgjvp, Center for Open Science.
    11. Rana Mostaghel & Pejvak Oghazi, 2017. "Elderly and technology tools: a fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1969-1982, September.
    12. Albort-Morant, Gema & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2016. "How useful are incubators for new entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2125-2129.
    13. Ana Tur-Porcar & Alicia Mas-Tur & José Antonio Belso, 2017. "Barriers to women entrepreneurship. Different methods, different results?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2019-2034, September.
    14. Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2019. "Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1301-1324, May.
    15. Sarianna M. Lundan & Jiatao Li, 2019. "Adjusting to and learning from institutional diversity: Toward a capability-building perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 36-47, February.
    16. Daniela Cristofoli & Benedetta Trivellato & Alessandro Sancino & Laura Maccio’ & Josip Markovic, 2021. "Public network leadership and the ties that lead," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 251-274, March.
    17. David Bedford & Mikko Sandelin, 2015. "Investigating management control configurations using qualitative comparative analysis: an overview and guidelines for application," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 5-26, April.
    18. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    19. Dionysis Skarmeas & Constantinos N. Leonidou & Charalampos Saridakis & Giuseppe Musarra, 2020. "Pathways to Civic Engagement with Big Social Issues: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 261-285, June.
    20. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Government Performance; Performance Indicators; Fuzzy-set Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:tadase:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laura Raiu Mina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.