The Earned Income Tax Credit: Insurance Without Disincentives?
AbstractThe EITC is now the single most important public insurance program in place in the US. It provides wage-subsidies to households that are sharply dependent on their demographic status, especially the number of children present in the household. In addition to productivity risk, it is the case that early in life, neither future marital status, nor the number of dependents, is known with certainty. Therefore, an important dimension of the EITC to act as insurance against such risk, particularly the state in which one experiences marital separation at any time after generating dependent children. Given the fundamental nature of EITC as a public insurance scheme, there are, however, potential effects on incentives. To avoid "abuse" of the EITC, the program must impose limits on eligibility. Providing insurance requires transfers to those doing badly, but the second necessitates having a "phase-out" range for eligibility. The phase out however means that the marginal reward to work may have to fall, sometimes sharply. We ask the following questions. Who benefits from the EITC, and to what extent are beneficiaries recipients of pure transfers relative to pure insurance? What the temporal distribution of benefits? Lastly, how distortionary is the EITC likely to be? For the latter, an important innovation of our paper is to utilize a key insight from work on dynamic models of labor supply under uninsurable risk, especially that of Floden and Linde (2001), and Pijoan-Mas (2006). These papers strongly suggest that the labor supply for the target population of the EITC will be relatively low. Our study, to our knowledge, is the first to measure the implications of the EITC in a setting capable of accommodating the essential features governing its impact. These are (i) a well-defined dynamic setting in which productivity varies with both age, and with uninsurable shocks (ii) liquidity constraints, and (iii) demographic risk. Preliminary results suggest that the EITC provides substantial insurance to young US households, and does not significantly alter, and hence does significantly distort, labor-leisure choices.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2010 Meeting Papers with number 1103.
Date of creation: 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Christian Zimmermann Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PO Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Nicole Simpson & Jill Tiefenthaler & Jameson Hyde, 2010.
"The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types,"
Population Research and Policy Review,
Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 843-864, December.
- Tiefenthaler, Jill & Simpson, Nicole & Hyde, Jameson, 2008. "The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-being: A Comparison across Household Types," Working Papers 2008-02, Department of Economics, Colgate University.
- Smeeding, Timothy M. & Phillips, Katherin Ross & O’Connor, Michael, 2000. "The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use, and Economic and Social Mobility," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 1187-210, December.
- Ventry, Dennis J. Jr., 2000. "The Collision of Tax and Welfare Politics: The Political History of the Earned Income Tax Credit, 1969-99," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 983-1026, December.
- David T. Ellwood & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 2001.
"The Middle-Class Parent Penalty: Child Benefits in the U.S. Tax Code,"
in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 15, pages 1-40
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- David T. Ellwood & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 2000. "The Middle Class Parent Penalty: Child Benefits in the U.S. Tax Code," NBER Working Papers 8031, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Saul D. Hoffman & Laurence S. Seidman, 1990. "The Earned Income Tax Credit," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number eitc, December.
- Timothy M. Smeeding & Katherin Ross Phillips & Michael O'Connor, 2000. "The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use and Economic and Social Mobility," JCPR Working Papers 139, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
- Romich, Jennifer L. & Weisner, Thomas, 2000. "How Families View and Use the EITC: Advance Payment versus Lump Sum Delivery," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 1245-66, December.
- Ellwood, David T., 2000. "The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage, and Living Arrangements," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 4), pages 1063-1106, December.
- Kartik Athreya & Devin Reilly & Nicole B. Simpson, 2010. "Earned income tax credit recipients: income, marginal tax rates, wealth, and credit constraints," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue 3Q, pages 229-258.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.