Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Earned Income Tax Credit and Rural Families: Differences between Participants and Non-participants

Contents:

Author Info

  • Sheila Mammen

    ()
    (Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst)

  • Frances C. Lawrence

    ()
    (School of Human Ecology, Louisiana State University)

  • Peter St. Marie

    ()
    (Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst)

  • Ann A. Berry

    ()
    (University of Tennessee Knoxville)

  • Suzanne Enzian Knight

    ()
    (Family Resource Management, University of New Hampshire Durham)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The differences between rural low-income mothers who were participants and non-participants in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) were examined. One-third of the 224 eligible mothers in a multi-state study did not claim the tax credit. Non-participants were more likely to be Hispanic, less educated, with larger families, borrowing money from family, and living in more rural counties. Participating mothers, on the other hand, were more food secure, perceived their household income as being adequate, reported recent improvements in their economic situation, were satisfied with life, and lived in states with a state EITC. Analysis of qualitative data revealed that rural mothers had many misconceptions about the EITC. These findings contribute to family and economic professionals’ understanding of why rural low-income families do not participate in the tax credit and assist in formulating policies and education/outreach efforts that would increase their participation

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://courses.umass.edu/resec/workingpapers/documents/ResEcWorkingPaper2009-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics in its series Working Papers with number 2009-1.

    as in new window
    Length: 43 pages
    Date of creation: Feb 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:dre:wpaper:2009-1

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.umass.edu/resec/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: EITC non-participants; EITC participants; rural low-income mothers; state EITC; rural low-income families;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dre:wpaper:2009-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Eileen Keegan).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.