This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Is Minimum Variance Hedging Necessary for Equity Indices? A study of Hedging and Cross-Hedging Exchange Traded Funds

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Carol Alexander () (ICMA Centre, University of Reading)
Andreza Barbosa () (ICMA Centre, University of Reading)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper investigates the optimal short-term hedging of Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) portfolios with index futures. Using daily data from May 2000 to December 2004 on the four largest passive ETFs (the Spider, the Diamond, the Cubes and the Russell iShare) and their corresponding index futures we examine the performance of minimum variance hedges for efficient variance reduction and for investors with exponential utility. Our findings relate to daily hedging based on OLS regression, exponentially weighted moving averages and ECM-GARCH models and the utility-based performance evaluation criterion is adopted to capture an efficient reduction in skewness and kurtosis as well as the variance. The basis risk on US equity indices is now extremely low and as a result we find no evidence that minimum variance hedge ratios outperform a naïve 1:1 futures hedge, either for individual ETFs or for portfolios of ETFs. Where minimum variance hedge ratios are useful is for the cross-hedging of ETFs, i.e. the netting of long-short positions prior to placing a futures hedge. We also find that hedging of an ETF portfolio with just one index future can be almost as effective as hedging with all the relevant index futures. Our results should be of interest to tax arbitrage investors in ETFs and their market makers, who often face large and heterogeneous creation and redemption demands on different ETFs. Both types of traders may consider hedging their positions overnight or over a few days.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.icmacentre.rdg.ac.uk/pdf/discussion/DP2005-16.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Henley Business School, Reading University in its series ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance with number icma-dp2005-16.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2005
Date of revision:
Publication status: Forthcoming in Journal of Banking and Finance
Handle: RePEc:rdg:icmadp:icma-dp2005-16

Contact details of provider:
Postal: PO Box 218, Whiteknights, Reading, Berks, RG6 6AA
Phone: +44 (0) 118 378 8226
Fax: +44 (0) 118 975 0236
Web page: http://www.henley.reading.ac.uk/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ed Quick).

Related research
Keywords: Exchange Traded Fund; Hedging; Minimum Variance; Utility;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions
G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.