IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rba/rbardp/rdp2019-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Confidence in Australian Banknotes

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Nguyen

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

  • Anny Francis

    (Reserve Bank of Australia)

Abstract

We investigate various factors that might influence the general public's confidence in the security of Australian banknotes, using a unique series of online banknotes surveys conducted by the Reserve Bank of Australia since 2010. We find that past encounters with counterfeits, and past experience of problems using banknotes, significantly worsen an indivdual's perceived counterfeit risk. Females, younger adults, and people with low income are also found to assess the counterfeit risk more negatively. Conversely, and with the exception of being a younger adult or having had serious problems using banknotes, confidence in the system to remove counterfeits is largely unaffected by demographic factors or past exposure to counterfeits. Awareness of a banknote upgrade program does not seem to have much effect on confidence, while knowing more security features of banknotes is associated with higher confidence. To assess the relationship between media coverage and public confidence in banknotes we use monthly data on media reports on counterfeiting, genuine banknotes mistakenly submitted as counterfeits, and actual counterfeit detections. As more unique counterfeit incidents are reported in the media, more genuine banknotes are mistakenly submitted as counterfeits, which we interpret as media coverage heightening the sense of counterfeit risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Nguyen & Anny Francis, 2019. "Confidence in Australian Banknotes," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2019-12, Reserve Bank of Australia.
  • Handle: RePEc:rba:rbardp:rdp2019-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2019/pdf/rdp2019-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Savage, 1993. "Demographic Influences on Risk Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 413-420, August.
    2. Richard G. Anderson & Marcela M. Williams, 2007. "Currency design in the United States and abroad: counterfeit deterrence and visual accessibility," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 89(Sep), pages 371-414.
    3. Hans de Heij, 2006. "Public feed back for better banknote design," DNB Working Papers 104, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    4. Scarborough, Brittney K. & Like-Haislip, Toya Z. & Novak, Kenneth J. & Lucas, Wayne L. & Alarid, Leanne F., 2010. "Assessing the relationship between individual characteristics, neighborhood context, and fear of crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 819-826, July.
    5. Richard G. Anderson & Marcela M. Williams, 2007. "Handicapping currency design: counterfeit deterrence and visual accessibility in the United States and abroad," Working Papers 2007-011, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurfarhana Hassan & Tahir Ahmad & Naji Arafat Mahat & Hasmerya Maarof & Mujahid Abdullahi & Nur Farah Dina Ajid & Zarith Sofia Jasmi & Foo Keat How, 2023. "Authentication of Counterfeit Hundred Ringgit Malaysian Banknotes Using Fuzzy Graph Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Kylie Springer & Priya Subramanian & Terence Turton, 2015. "Australian Banknotes: Assisting People with Vision Impairment," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 01-12, March.
    3. Frank A.G. den Butter & Stefan P.T. Groot & Faroek Lazrak, 2007. "The Transaction Costs Perspective on Standards as a Source of Trade and Productivity Growth," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-090/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Fengrui Jing & Lin Liu & Suhong Zhou & Guangwen Song, 2020. "Examining the Relationship between Hukou Status, Perceived Neighborhood Conditions, and Fear of Crime in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Cherng G. Ding & York Y. Woo & Her‐Jiun Sheu & Hui‐Chen Chien & Shu‐Fen Shen, 1996. "An Effective Statistical Approach for Comparative Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 411-419, June.
    6. Deana GROBE & Robin DOUTHITT & Lydia ZEPEDA, 1997. "CONSUMER RISK PERCEPTION PROFILES FOR THE FOOD-RELATED BIOTECHNOLOGY, RECOMBINANT BOVINE GROWTH HORMONE (rbGH)," Department of Resource Economics Regional Research Project 9613, University of Massachusetts.
    7. Jesper Akesson & Sam Ashworth-Hayes & Robert Hahn & Robert Metcalfe & Itzhak Rasooly, 2022. "Fatalism, beliefs, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 147-190, April.
    8. Rose Ann Camille C. Caliso & Jamil Paolo S. Francisco & Emmanuel M. Garcia, 2020. "Broad Insecurity and Perceived Victimization Risk," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 32(2), pages 160-179, July.
    9. Gau, Jacinta M. & Corsaro, Nicholas & Brunson, Rod K., 2014. "Revisiting broken windows theory: A test of the mediation impact of social mechanisms on the disorder–fear relationship," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 579-588.
    10. Kuen, Kiseong & Weisburd, David & White, Clair & Hinkle, Joshua C., 2022. "Examining impacts of street characteristics on residents' fear of crime: Evidence from a longitudinal study of crime hot spots," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Jocelyn Raude & Patrick Peretti-Watel & Jeremy Ward & Claude Flamand & Pierre Verger, 2018. "Are Perceived Prevalences of Infection also Biased and How? Lessons from Large Epidemics of Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Tropical Regions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(3), pages 377-389, April.
    12. Chris Stewart & Iris Chan & Crystal Ossolinski & David Halperin & Paul Ryan, 2014. "The Evolution of Payment Costs in Australia," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2014-14, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    13. Louie Rivers & Joseph Arvai & Paul Slovic, 2010. "Beyond a Simple Case of Black and White: Searching for the White Male Effect in the African‐American Community," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 65-77, January.
    14. Anna Alberini & Stefania Tonin & Margherita Turvani & Aline Chiabai, 2007. "Paying for permanence: Public preferences for contaminated site cleanup," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 155-178, April.
    15. Paul M. Kellstedt & Sammy Zahran & Arnold Vedlitz, 2008. "Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 113-126, February.
    16. Henrik Andersson & Petter Lundborg, 2007. "Perception of own death risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 67-84, February.
    17. Carter, Travis M. & Wolfe, Scott E., 2021. "Explaining the relationship between neighborhood disorder and crime fear: The perceptual role of neighbors and the police," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Frederic Vandermoere & Raf Vanderstraeten, 2014. "Back and forward to the future: an explorative study of public responses to urban groundwater contamination," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 720-732, May.
    19. Melania Michetti & Stefano Ghinoi, 2020. "Climate-driven vulnerability and risk perception: implications for climate change adaptation in rural Mexico," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 290-302, September.
    20. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2016. "Post-materialism, Religiosity, Political Orientation, Locus of Control and Concern for Global Warming: A Multilevel Analysis Across 40 Nations," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1273-1298, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banknotes; counterfeits; confidence; security features; demographics; media reporting; surveys;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rba:rbardp:rdp2019-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Drew (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rbagvau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.