IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qeh/qehwps/qehwps177.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

More Than Meets The Eye: Re-Reading Forest Policy Discourse In Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Niaz Ahmed Khan (University of Dhaka)

Abstract

This article attempts to deconstruct the Bangladesh forest policy discourse by examining its key purport, narrative structure, and underlying messages. By examining the country's principal forest policy documents from a discourse perspective, the study argues that the Bangladesh state's policy response to the 'problems' and 'development of forestry sector' has been rhetorically loaded but politically cautious, covert and calculated. Under the conditions of governmentality, the policy and plan prescriptions, as part of discursive regime, are presented as technical instruments for promoting efficiency and effectiveness in the forestry sector. The power and politics inherent in this exercise are constantly cloaked; yet these are pervasive, and find expression in their ability to serve certain practical systematic purposes. These are: as classificatory devices to categorise and name target groups and services rendered; as narratives to justify (or condemn) a particular scenario and course of action; as rhetorical devices and discursive formations that function to empower some (e.g. public forestry officials) and silence others (e.g. restrictions put on 'land grabbers' and 'encroachers'); as political technologies to depoliticize and shape 'target group' conceptions and distribution of services; as escape hatches to hive off difficult responsibility and accountability questions; and as a lever to muster and wield power on the part of the state. Ultimately, the policy discourse and the associated formulation exercise may contribute both to the depoliticization and the bureaucratization of the development process. The paper concludes with a call for increased research on this relatively less-explored area of study.

Suggested Citation

  • Niaz Ahmed Khan (University of Dhaka), "undated". "More Than Meets The Eye: Re-Reading Forest Policy Discourse In Bangladesh," QEH Working Papers qehwps177, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://workingpapers.qeh.ox.ac.uk/RePEc/qeh/qehwps/qehwps177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blair, Harry W., 1985. "Participation, public policy, political economy and development in rural Bangladesh, 1958-85," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 13(12), pages 1231-1247, December.
    2. Roe, Emery M., 1991. "Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 287-300, April.
    3. Barbara Harriss-White, "undated". "Development, Policy and Agriculture in India in the 1990s," QEH Working Papers qehwps78, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    4. Blair, Harry W., 1978. "Rural development, class structure and bureaucracy in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 65-82, January.
    5. Louise G. White, 1994. "Policy analysis as discourse," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 506-525.
    6. Marion Glaser, 1985. "The Use of Labelling in Urban Low Income Housing in the Third World Case–Study of Bogota, Colombia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 409-428, July.
    7. Bernard Schaffer, 1985. "Policy Makers Have Their Needs Too: Irish Itinerants and the Culture of Poverty," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 375-408, July.
    8. Geoffrey Lamb, 1985. "Bernard Schaffer: A Personal Appreciation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 515-520, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leipold, Sina, 2014. "Creating forests with words — A review of forest-related discourse studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 12-20.
    2. Rahman, Md Saifur & Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Giessen, Lukas, 2016. "Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-53.
    3. Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Rahman, Sabrina, 2016. "Forest in crisis: 2 decades of media discourse analysis of Bangladesh print media," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 16-21.
    4. Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Krott, Max, 2012. "Identifying policy change — Analytical program analysis: An example of two decades of forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 93-99.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Clausen & Stefano B. Longo, 2012. "The Tragedy of the Commodity and the Farce of AquAdvantage Salmon®," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 229-251, January.
    2. Julius Court & Simon Maxwell, 2005. "Policy entrepreneurship for poverty reduction: bridging research and policy in international development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 713-725.
    3. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2020. "Who has the better story? On the narrative foundations of agricultural development dichotomies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Jacob Etten, 2022. "Revisiting the adequacy of the economic policy narrative underpinning the Green Revolution," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1357-1372, December.
    5. Venot, Jean-Philippe, 2016. "A Success of Some Sort: Social Enterprises and Drip Irrigation in the Developing World," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 69-81.
    6. Kenneth King & Robert Palmer & Rachel Hayman, 2005. "Bridging research and policy on education, training and their enabling environments," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 803-817.
    7. Wittmer, Heidi & Birner, Regina, 2005. "Between conservationism, eco-populism and developmentalism: discourses in biodiversity policy in Thailand and Indonesia," CAPRi working papers 37, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Arnt Fløysand & Emil Tomson Lindfors & Stig-Erik Jakobsen & Lars Coenen, 2020. "Place-Based Directionality of Innovation: Tasmanian Salmon Farming and Responsible Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Alejandro García Lozano & Crisol Méndez-Medina & Xavier Basurto & María Tercero Tovar, 2023. "Problemáticas: Multi-scalar, affective and performative politics of collective action among fishing cooperatives in Mexico," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1263-1281, November.
    10. Koen Arts & Maiara Thaisa Oliveira Rabelo & Daniela Maimoni De Figueiredo & Georgina Maffey & Antonio Augusto Rossotto Ioris & Pierre Girard, 2018. "Online and Offline Representations of Biocultural Diversity: A Political Ecology Perspective on Nature-Based Tourism and Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Pantanal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Arslan Waheed, 2021. "“I Will Obey Whatever Orders Will Be Given to Me …”: A Critical Discourse Analysis of an Affidavit from a Slum Upgradation and Rehabilitation Project in Islamabad, Pakistan," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Leslie Acton, 2023. "Politicizing the “unknown†: Territorial narratives, shared spatial imaginaries, and Bermuda’s oceans," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(6), pages 1113-1131, September.
    13. Wood, Geof, 2022. "Rentiers and Contractors: The Future of Agrarian Bangladesh Part 1: The Agrarian Transition Since Liberation," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 12(1), June.
    14. Maxwell, Simon, 1998. "Saucy with the Gods: nutrition and food security speak to poverty," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3-4), pages 215-230, November.
    15. Montefrio, Marvin Joseph F. & Dressler, Wolfram H., 2016. "The Green Economy and Constructions of the “Idle” and “Unproductive” Uplands in the Philippines," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 114-126.
    16. Taewook Huh & Yun Young Kim, 2021. "Triangular Trajectory of Sustainable Development: Panel Analysis of the OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, March.
    17. McCarthy, John F., 2004. "Changing to Gray: Decentralization and the Emergence of Volatile Socio-Legal Configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1199-1223, July.
    18. Alastair Orr & Elijah Muange, 2022. "Hedgehog or fox? Theories of change for dryland cereals in Eastern Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 532-549, April.
    19. Roe, Emery M., 1995. "More than the politics of decentralization: Local government reform, district development and public administration in Zimbabwe," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 833-843, May.
    20. James Sumberg & John Thompson & Philip Woodhouse, 2013. "Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 71-83, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qehoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.