IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qed/dpaper/4577.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation of the potential economic welfare gains to SACU from trade facilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Shahrzad Safaeimanesh

    (Department of Economics, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus)

  • Glenn P. Jenkins

    (Department of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Trade facilitation is important for the South African Customs Union (SACU) countries because the expansion of international trade is a priority for enhancing their economic growth. Unfortunately, the high trade compliance costs facing importers and exporters operating in SACU conflict with this objective. This article aims to quantify the annual economic welfare gains that the member countries of SACU could realise from reforms that would reduce the documentary and border compliance time and costs. We use a partial equilibrium welfare economics framework that uses up-to-date sets of general equilibrium estimates of import demand and export supply elasticities by country. The impacts on the volume of trade flows and economic welfare are quantified to reduce documentary and border compliance time and trade compliance costs. The economic welfare changes from reducing the documentary and border compliance time and costs for imports and exports would be between US$2.2 billion and US$3.7 billion (2018 prices) or between 0.54% and 0.90% of GDP of the SACU countries. The economic welfare gains from reducing the excess administrative costs for imports and exports of SACU members would be between US$2.2 billion and US$3.7 billion (2018 prices) or between 0.54% and 0.90% of the GDP of the SACU. The most important reforms needed to realize these cost savings include a Single Window administrative structure. In this case, both customs, health, welfare, and controls and the payment of all duties, taxes, and licenses are handled by a single administrative office. Failure to move fast on such changes would have a negative impact on the well-being of SACU members.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahrzad Safaeimanesh & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2021. "Estimation of the potential economic welfare gains to SACU from trade facilitation," Development Discussion Papers 2021-10, JDI Executive Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cri-world.com/publications/qed_dp_4577.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiau Looi Kee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2008. "Import Demand Elasticities and Trade Distortions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 666-682, November.
    2. Obie Porteous, 2019. "High Trade Costs and Their Consequences: An Estimated Dynamic Model of African Agricultural Storage and Trade," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 327-366, October.
    3. Kore Marc Guei, 2019. "Does financial structure matter for economic growth: evidence from South Africa," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 1941-1957.
    4. Mena Hassan & Gbadebo Odularu & Musibau Adetunji Babatunde, 2020. "Introduction: Trade Relations, Business Opportunities and Policy Instruments for Fostering Africa’s Trade," Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, in: Gbadebo O.A. Odularu & Mena Hassan & Musibau Adetunji Babatunde (ed.), Fostering Trade in Africa, pages 1-4, Springer.
    5. World Bank, 2019. "Doing Business 2019," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 30438, December.
    6. Arvis, Jean-Franã‡Ois & Duval, Yann & Shepherd, Ben & Utoktham, Chorthip & Raj, Anasuya, 2016. "Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996–2010," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 451-474, July.
    7. Glenn Jenkins, 1996. "Information Technology And Innovation In Tax Administration," Development Discussion Papers 1996-03, JDI Executive Programs.
    8. -, 2018. "CEPAL Review no. 124," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    9. Porteous, Obie C., 2015. "High Trade Costs and Their Consequences: An Estimated Model of African Agricultural Storage and Trade," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205776, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Mena Hassan, 2020. "Africa and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement: State of Play, Implementation Challenges, and Policy Recommendations in the Digital Era," Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development, in: Gbadebo O.A. Odularu & Mena Hassan & Musibau Adetunji Babatunde (ed.), Fostering Trade in Africa, pages 5-38, Springer.
    11. Andr� C Jordaan, 2014. "The impact of trade facilitation factors on South Africa's exports to a selection of African countries," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 591-605, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahrzad Safaeimanesh & Glenn P. Jenkins, 2020. "Trade Facilitation and Its Impacts on the Economic Welfare and Sustainable Development of the ECOWAS Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Helena Afonso & Sebastian Vergara, 2022. "Exporters in Africa: What Role for Trade Costs?," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 144-158, December.
    3. Reynal-Querol, Marta & García-Montalvo, José, 2017. "Ethnic Diversity and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 12400, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. José Garcia Montalvo & Marta Reynal-Querol, 2017. "Ethnic diversity and growth: revisiting the evidence," Economics Working Papers 1585, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    5. Fuenzalida-O'Shee, Darcy & Valenzuela-Klagges, Bárbara & Corvalán-Quiroz, Alejandro, 2018. "Trade facilitation and its effects on Chile’s bilateral trade between 2006 and 2014," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    6. Santeramo, Fabio G., 2017. "On Non-Tariff Measures and Changes in Trade Routes: From North-North to South-South Trade?," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 263493, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Gouel, Christophe & Laborde, David, 2021. "The crucial role of domestic and international market-mediated adaptation to climate change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "On the impact of non-tariff measures on trade performances of the African agri-food sector," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 389-406, October.
    9. Stanley Tweyman, 2022. "The Two Truths that Descartes Discovers in His Meditations on First Philosophy that Do Not Require the Divine Guarantee," European Journal of Social Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, January -.
    10. Sébastien Jean & David Laborde & Will Martin, 2008. "Choosing Sensitive Agricultural Products in Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 2008-18, CEPII research center.
    11. Geoffrey Barrows & Hélène Ollivier & Ariell Reshef, 2023. "Production Function Estimation with Multi-Destination Firms," CESifo Working Paper Series 10716, CESifo.
    12. Charlotte Emlinger & Viola Lamani, 2020. "International trade, quality sorting and trade costs: the case of Cognac," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(3), pages 579-609, August.
    13. Nahapetyan Yervand, 2019. "The benefits of the Velvet Revolution in Armenia: Estimation of the short-term economic gains using deep neural networks," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 53(6), pages 286-303, January.
    14. Hoekman, Bernard & Nicita, Alessandro, 2011. "Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 2069-2079.
    15. Bouët, Antoine & Elbehri, Aziz & Nguyen, Duc Bao & Traoré, Fousseini, 2022. "Measuring Agricultural Trade Integration in Southeast Asia," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 37(2), pages 235-266.
    16. N'dri, Lasme Mathieu & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2020. "Financial inclusion, mobile money, and individual welfare: The case of Burkina Faso," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    17. Chad P. Bown & Patricia Tovar, 2016. "Preferential Liberalization, Antidumping, and Safeguards: Stumbling Block Evidence from MERCOSUR," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 262-294, November.
    18. Will Martin, 2018. "High-Value Agricultural Exports from Africa," Policy notes & Policy briefs 1803, Policy Center for the New South.
    19. Ian Keay, 2019. "Protection for maturing industries: Evidence from Canadian trade patterns and trade policy, 1870–1913," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 1464-1496, November.
    20. Edamisan Stephen Ikuemonisan & Taiwo Ejiola Mafimisebi & Igbekele Amos Ajibefun & Adeyose Emmanuel Akinbola & Olanrewaju Peter Oladoyin, 2022. "Analysis of Youth’s Willingness to Exploit Agribusiness Opportunities in Nigeria with Entrepreneurship as a Moderating Variable," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade facilitation; Southern Africa Customs Union (SACU); South Africa; Trade compliance costs; Trade reform; Economic welfare gains;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.