IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ptu/wpaper/w202211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The solvency and funding cost nexus - the role of market stigma for buffer usability

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Carvalho

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the banks’ solvency ratio and their funding costs using a proprietary dataset from Banco de Portugal for 21 Portuguese banks from 2006 to 2020. In light of the discussion on impediments to capital buffer usability by banks, we focus on the importance of market discipline to this relationship. Our results suggest that the relationship between solvency and funding costs is negative and state-dependent, i.e. market participants become more sensitive to changes in solvency during economic downturns. The relationship is stronger for market-based financing sources in comparison to deposits. Finally, we use a breakpoint analysis and find that investors are more likely to penalize the same absolute deterioration in solvency levels when banks are already in a fragile position. Our findings support the hypothesis that fear of market stigma may make banks reticent to use buffers in times of stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Carvalho, 2022. "The solvency and funding cost nexus - the role of market stigma for buffer usability," Working Papers w202211, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:ptu:wpaper:w202211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bportugal.pt/sites/default/files/anexos/papers/wp202211.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aldasoro, Iñaki & Cho, Chun Hee & Park, Kyounghoon, 2022. "Bank solvency risk and funding cost interactions: Evidence from Korea," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Thomas B. King, 2008. "Discipline and Liquidity in the Interbank Market," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(2‐3), pages 295-317, March.
    3. Miss Rita Babihuga & Marco Spaltro, 2014. "Bank Funding Costs for International Banks," IMF Working Papers 2014/071, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Elyas Elyasiani & Jason Keegan, 2017. "Market Discipline in the Secondary Bond Market: The Case of Systemically Important Banks," Working Papers 17-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    5. Couaillier, Cyril & Lo Duca, Marco & Reghezza, Alessio & Rodriguez d’Acri, Costanza & Scopelliti, Alessandro, 2021. "Bank capital buffers and lending in the euro area during the pandemic," Financial Stability Review, European Central Bank, vol. 2.
    6. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    7. Saleem Bahaj & Frederic Malherbe, 2020. "The Forced Safety Effect: How Higher Capital Requirements Can Increase Bank Lending," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(6), pages 3013-3053, December.
    8. Mr. Stefan W. Schmitz & Michael Sigmund & Ms. Laura Valderrama, 2017. "Bank Solvency and Funding Cost: New Data and New Results," IMF Working Papers 2017/116, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Huizinga, Harry, 2004. "Market discipline and deposit insurance," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 375-399, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucas Avezum, 2023. "To use or not to use? Capital buffers and lending during a crisis," Working Papers w202308, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Arnould & Giuseppe Avignone & Cosimo Pancaro & Dawid Żochowski, 2022. "Bank funding costs and solvency," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(10), pages 931-963, July.
    2. Jorien Freriks & Jan Kakes, 2021. "Bank interest rate margins in a negative interest rate environment," Working Papers 721, DNB.
    3. Eyollan Naidoo & Mukelani Nkuna & Daan Steenkamp, 2020. "Developments in debt issuance costs of South African banks," Working Papers 10157, South African Reserve Bank.
    4. Hałaj, Grzegorz, 2018. "System-wide implications of funding risk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1151-1181.
    5. Inoguchi, Masahiro, 2013. "Interbank market, stock market, and bank performance in East Asia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 136-156.
    6. Luong, Thi Mai & Pieters, Russell & Scheule, Harald & Wu, Eliza, 2020. "The impact of government guarantees on banks' wholesale funding costs and lending behavior: Evidence from a natural experiment," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Martin Eling, 2012. "What Do We Know About Market Discipline in Insurance?," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 15(2), pages 185-223, September.
    8. Manuel Monjas & María Rocamora & Nuria Suárez, 2023. "Determinants of bail-in debt yields in the EU banking sector: a multi-country approach with idiosyncratic factors," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1055-1095, November.
    9. Ćehajić, Aida & Košak, Marko, 2021. "Macroprudential measures and developments in bank funding costs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Tran, Dung Viet & Nguyen, Cuong, 2023. "Policy uncertainty and bank’s funding costs: The effects of the financial crisis, Covid-19 pandemic, and market discipline," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Hałaj, Grzegorz, 2018. "Agent-based model of system-wide implications of funding risk," Working Paper Series 2121, European Central Bank.
    12. Thi Mai Luong, 2020. "Selection Effects of Lender and Borrower Choices on Risk Measurement, Management and Prudential Regulation," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 3-2020.
    13. Allen Berger & Rima Turk-Ariss, 2015. "Do Depositors Discipline Banks and Did Government Actions During the Recent Crisis Reduce this Discipline? An International Perspective," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 103-126, October.
    14. Iñaki Aldasoro & Kyounghoon Park, 2018. "Bank solvency risk and funding cost interactions in a small open economy: evidence from Korea," BIS Working Papers 738, Bank for International Settlements.
    15. Cerasi, Vittoria & Galfrascoli, Paola, 2023. "Bail-in and bank funding costs," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Tijmen Daniels & Shahin Kamalodin, 2016. "The Return on Equity of Large Dutch Banks," DNB Occasional Studies 1405, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    17. Dent, Kieran & Hacıoğlu Hoke, Sinem & Panagiotopoulos, Apostolos, 2021. "Solvency and wholesale funding cost interactions at UK banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2021. "Sustainable development and financial institutions: Do banks' environmental policies influence customer deposits?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 643-656, January.
    19. Brunetti, M. & Ciciretti, R. & Djordjevic, Lj., 2016. "The determinants of household’s bank switching," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 175-189.
    20. Gambacorta, Leonardo & Oliviero, Tommaso & Shin, Hyun Song, 2020. "Low price-to-book ratios and bank dividend payout policies," CEPR Discussion Papers 15615, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ptu:wpaper:w202211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: DEE-NTD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdpgvpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.