IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/84237.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis on BCG Growth Sharing Matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Mohajan, Haradhan

Abstract

In the 21st century, sustainable improvement of business faces various challenges for the global economic competition. But, these challenges can be overcome by the efficient business strategies. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helps the business organizations to develop their efficiency for the successful operation of their business activities. To develop the efficiency of marketing decision making, the BCG Matrix plays an effective tool for strategic planning of product performance in industry and company level. It analyses to identify which strategic business units to invest in, which to sell off, and which to shut down. It helps a company to distribute their available resources through the efficient business management. It is one of the most popular and helpful consulting firms. The paper tries to provide a guideline to the business organizations to choose the best business policies by the use of BCG matrix.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohajan, Haradhan, 2017. "An Analysis on BCG Growth Sharing Matrix," MPRA Paper 84237, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Dec 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/84237/1/MPRA_paper_84237.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1994. "Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: experimental results," MPRA Paper 81684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2015. "Present and Future of Nestlé Bangladesh Limited," MPRA Paper 82850, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Apr 2015.
    3. Joubert, J.C.N. & Jooste, A. & Lotriet, R., 2011. "The Cash Cows, Dogs, Stars and Problem Children of the South African Agricultural Sector," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 1(1), pages 1-6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gramlich, Samantha & Obreiter, Nadine & Otomierczyk, Laura & Storz, Leonie, 2021. "Portfolioanalysen im Vergleich," Working Papers for Marketing & Management 59, Offenburg University, Department of Media and Information.
    2. Che-Yu Hung & Chien-Chih Wang & Shi-Woei Lin & Bernard C. Jiang, 2022. "An Empirical Comparison of the Sales Forecasting Performance for Plastic Tray Manufacturing Using Missing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Gomez, Miguel I. & Puerto, Sergio & Zahniser, Steven & Li, Jie, 2021. "U.S. Agricultural Exports to Colombia: Rising Sales in Response to Trade Liberalization and Changing Consumer Trends," USDA Miscellaneous 316795, United States Department of Agriculture.
    4. Amir, Ja'far & Mohammad, Wily, 2022. "ANTHOLOGY OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT: Business Scientific Thoughts," OSF Preprints cwgya, Center for Open Science.
    5. Chang, Yu-Chun & Lee, Wei-Hao & Wu, Chi-Hung, 2019. "Potential opportunities for Asian airports to develop self-connecting passenger markets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 7-16.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florin Tudor Ionescu, 2011. "Boston Consulting Group II – A Business Portfolio Analysis Matrix," International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(2), pages 65-70, September.
    2. Juhi Gahlot Sarkar, 2019. "Managing brand strength in a brand portfolio: A conceptual analysis," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(4), pages 219-227.
    3. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    4. Hanno Drews, 2008. "Abschied vom Marktwachstums-Marktanteils-Portfolio nach über 35 Jahren Einsatz? Eine kritische Überprüfung der BCG-Matrix," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 39-57, May.
    5. Nora CHIRIȚĂ & Andrei VIȘAN & Mihaela POPESCU, 2020. "Measuring Adobe Company performance from the perspective of a Complex Adaptive System," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(4(625), W), pages 55-72, Winter.
    6. Kesten C. Green & J. Scott Armstrong, 2005. "Competitor-oriented Objectives: The Myth of Market Share," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 17/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    7. Armstrong, J. Scott & Collopy, Fred, 1996. "Competitor Orientation: Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability," MPRA Paper 81676, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Woodside, Arch G., 2012. "Incompetency training: Theory, practice, and remedies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 279-293.
    9. Nippa, Michael, 2011. "Zur Notwendigkeit des Corporate Portfolio Management: Eine Würdigung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung der letzten vier Jahrzehnte," Freiberg Working Papers 2011/02, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. JS Armstrong & Roderick J. Brodie, 2004. "Portfolio Planning Methods: Faulty Approach or Faulty Research? A Rejoinder to 'Making Better Decisions' by Wensley," General Economics and Teaching 0412017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Nudurupati, Sai Sudhakar & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Lascelles, David & Caton, Nicholas, 2015. "Strategic sourcing with multi-stakeholders through value co-creation: An evidence from global health care company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 248-257.
    12. JS Armstrong & Fred Collopy, 2004. "Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability," General Economics and Teaching 0412014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. de Villiers, Rouxelle & Woodside, Arch G. & Marshall, Roger, 2016. "Making tough decisions competently: Assessing the value of product portfolio planning methods, devil’s advocacy, group discussion, weighting priorities, and evidenced-based information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2849-2862.
    14. Wetzstein, Anton & Hartmann, Evi & Benton jr., W.C. & Hohenstein, Nils-Ole, 2016. "A systematic assessment of supplier selection literature – State-of-the-art and future scope," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 304-323.
    15. Chang, Wen-Long & Chen, Shih-Ting, 2015. "The impact of World Café on entrepreneurial strategic planning capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1283-1290.
    16. Herbert Dawid & Marc Reimann, 2005. "Evaluating Market Attractiveness: Individual Incentives Versus Industry Profitability," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 321-355, June.
    17. Armstrong, J. Scott, 2003. "Discovery and communication of important marketing findings: Evidence and proposals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 69-84, January.
    18. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2015. "Present and Future of Nestlé Bangladesh Limited," MPRA Paper 82850, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Apr 2015.
    19. Roger Marshall & David Bibby & Na WoonBong, 2013. "Making Sense of Complex Marketing Decision Systems: Decision System Analysis," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 12(2), pages 121-130, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BCG Matrix; Business Organizations; Business Improvement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.