IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/69986.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Загађивање Атмосфере И Механизми Кјотског Протокола: Да Ли Је Тржиште Универзално Решење?
[Pollution of atmosphere and mechanisms of Kyoto Protocole: Is there the market universal solution?]

Author

Listed:
  • Bukvić, Rajko

Abstract

Serbian Abstract. У раду се разматрају проблеми загађења и деструкције природне средине, посебно атмосфере. У оквиру тога, проблеми концентрације угљеника, односно гасова стаклене баште разматрају се као једна од главних последица антропогених активности, и као један од главних узрока глобалних климатских промена. У другој половини 20. века била је предложена примена многих шема за стварање тржишног механизма за решавање тих проблема. Такви напори посебно су се повећали у последњој деценији 20 века, да би најзад Кјотски протокол подржао неколико флексибилних механизама, као решење тих проблема. Без обзира на све те напоре, током првог периода њихове примене (2008–2012), емисије угљеника су порасле. Досадашња искуства, не само у овој области, остављају отвореним питање да ли је тржиште универзално решење. English Abstract. The article considers the problem of pollution and destruction of environment, especially the pollution of atmosphere. Within these, problems of the carbon concentration, i.e. greenhouse gases, are considered as one of the main results of the anthropogenic activities, and consequently one of the main causes of the global climate change. In the second half of the XX century many schemes for involving market mechanism in solving these problems were proposed. These efforts especially increased in the last decade of XX century and finally the Kyoto Protocol supported many flexible mechanisms, as a solution for these problems. In spite of all these efforts, during the first period of its implementation (2008–2012) the emissions of carbon were increased. Experiences with market, not only in this sector, leave the problem unresolved: is the market universal solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukvić, Rajko, 2015. "Загађивање Атмосфере И Механизми Кјотског Протокола: Да Ли Је Тржиште Универзално Решење? [Pollution of atmosphere and mechanisms of Kyoto Protocole: Is there the market universal solution?]," MPRA Paper 69986, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:69986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69986/1/MPRA_paper_69986.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    2. Bukvić, Rajko & Kartavykh, Marina & Zakharov, Vladimir, 2015. "Mechanisms and projects for reducing greenhouse gases emissions in Russia," MPRA Paper 74809, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    3. Cameron Hepburn, 2006. "Regulation by Prices, Quantities, or Both: A Review of Instrument Choice," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 226-247, Summer.
    4. MacKenzie, Donald, 2009. "Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 440-455, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bukvić, Rajko & Pajović, Ivan, 2017. "Региональные Схемы Рыночных Механизмов Регулирования Выбросов Парниковых Газов: Опыт И Перспективы [Regional Schemes of Market Mechanisms of Greenhouse Gases Emission: Experiences and Perspectives]," MPRA Paper 82099, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    2. Bukvić, Rajko, 2015. "Рыночные Механизмы Сокращения Выбросов Парниковых Газов И Активности И Перспективы России [Market mechanisms of reduction of greenhouse gases emissions and actions and perspectives of Russia]," MPRA Paper 71616, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    3. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Bukvić, Rajko, 2017. "Ефекат Стакленика, Глобално Загревање И Кјотски Протокол [Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming and Kyoto Protocol]," MPRA Paper 83953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    5. Buchholz Wolfgang & Heindl Peter, 2015. "Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 324-350, December.
    6. Hélène Tordjman, 2018. "Dématérialiser la nature pour la faire entrer dans la sphère du marché," CEPN Working Papers 2018-12, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    7. Hélène Tordjman, 2018. "Dématérialiser la nature pour la faire entrer dans la sphère du marché," Working Papers hal-01948581, HAL.
    8. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Finch, John & Geiger, Susi & Reid, Emma, 2017. "Captured by technology? How material agency sustains interaction between regulators and industry actors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 160-170.
    10. Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & de Vries, Laurens J., 2014. "Cross-border electricity market effects due to price caps in an emission trading system: An agent-based approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 139-158.
    11. Cook, Allan, 2009. "Emission rights: From costless activity to market operations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 456-468, April.
    12. Simon Cadez & Albert Czerny & Peter Letmathe, 2019. "Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Lohmann, Larry, 2009. "Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost-benefit," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3-4), pages 499-534, April.
    14. Hélène Tordjman, 2018. "Dématérialiser la nature pour la faire entrer dans la sphère du marché," CEPN Working Papers hal-01948581, HAL.
    15. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel, 2012. "Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 980-995.
    16. Shaozeng Zhang, 2017. "From externality in economics to leakage in carbon markets: An anthropological approach to market making," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 132-143, January.
    17. Spash, Clive L. & Theine, Hendrik, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Discussion Papers 2016/04, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
      • Clive L. Spash & Hendrik Theine, 2016. "Voluntary Individual Carbon Trading," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2016_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    18. Bukvić, Rajko & Zakharov, Vladimir & Kartavykh, Marina, 2015. "Механизмы Регулирования Выбросов Парниковых Газов И Киотский Протокол [Mechanisms of reduction of greenhouse gases and Kyoto Protocol]," MPRA Paper 71603, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Oct 2015.
    19. Nicholas Howarth, 2011. "Clean Energy Technology and the Role of Non-Carbon Price-Based Policy: An Evolutionary Economics Perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 871-891, October.
    20. Schmidt, Klaus & Herweg, Fabian, 2021. "Prices versus Quantities with Morally Concerned Consumers," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242371, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    гасови стаклене баште; Кјотски протокол; тржишта угљеника; флексибилни механизми greenhouse gases (GHG); the Kyoto Protocol; carbon markets; flexible mechanisms;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:69986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.