This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

India’s Economic Growth and the Role of Foreign Direct Investment

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Singh, Lakhwinder

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Indian economy has reached in the orbit of high rate of economic growth. She is being widely acclaimed and recognized as an emerging global economic power. The rate of growth recorded during the period 1950-51 to 2004-05 clearly showed a tendency of steady upward trend. However, the decade of eighties emerged as a beginning of the high rate of economic growth or at least a dramatic departure from the past growth performance. This tendency had continued in the 1990s and further growth stimulus has occurred in the early 21st century. This paper attempts to unravel the factors behind high growth trajectory and major structural problems encountered by the Indian economy. The question that begs for an explanation is that is high growth and inflows of FDI solve structural imbalance of Indian economy and will it succeed in improving the lot of bottom section of the Indian economy, which are living in abysmally poor socio-economic conditions in the countryside. The employment elasticity in the agriculture and industrial sector has gone down in the post-reform period, therefore, the creation of employment opportunities will be a gigantic task for the policy makers. FDI has come in the most capital-intensive sectors; therefore, the desired employment opportunities could not be created especially for the manual and the semi skilled labor. High skilled labor gained substantially. That is why high growth is called urban centric and thus has created a wedge between the rural and urban economy. There is urgent need to fill this void. Policy making process has matured in the democratic Indian polity since the independence. It is thus expected that the growing problems will receive mature response and policy will be articulated in such a manner to use FDI the way China has used to enhance economic growth while taking more and more investment to industrialize the rural sector of the Indian economy.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6427/
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 6427.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 22 Dec 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6427

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

Related research
Keywords: Indian economic growth public policy structural change Foreign direct investment

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O1 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
O5 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.