Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

省直管县改革的扩权模式选择:全面直管还是省内单列?
[Delegation Pattern of “Province Administrating County”: Overall Reform or County Economic Power Expansion?]

Contents:

Author Info

  • gong, rukai
  • yao, dongmin
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    从地方政府发现和利用经济发展机会的视角出发,考察目前省直管县试点改革中出现的主要扩权模式,提出并论证“省直管县改革是全面直管与省内单列的扩权模式选择”的议题。在动态博弈的框架下分析代理人(县级政府)的最优努力水平和委托人(省级政府)的期望效用,通过对不同扩权模式下省级政府的期望效用进行比较,总结出省直管县改革扩权模式选择的经济学逻辑;并进一步地考虑县级政府之间的异质性和经济关联对省直管县扩权模式选择的影响,总结出省直管县改革扩权模式选择的经济学逻辑。得出如下政策启示:省级政府在进行扩权模式选择时,需因地制宜,综合考虑经济发展机会的期望收益、县级政府之间的异质性和经济关联,以期本文的研究结果为目前正在推行的省直管县改革实践提供理论借鉴。

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/52997/
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 52997.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Jan 2014
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:52997

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
    Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
    Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
    Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: 省直管县,全面直管,省内单列,经济发展机会;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Aghion, Philippe & Tirole, Jean, 1997. "Formal and Real Authority in Organizations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(1), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:52997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.