Can Lipset’s theory travel through time and space? the destination Nicaragua, 1972-1998. A time series test of the social requisites of democracy
AbstractThe epigraph is emblematic of an orthodox theoretical view that ‘only in a wealthy society could a situation exist in which the mass of the population could intelligently participate in politics’ and that this relationship is universal and applicable cross time and space. Comparing ancient Greece to modern societies, arguments are made that wealthy societies prerequisite mass participating in politics as well as an avoidance of irresponsible demagogues. The development of self-restraint through wealth emerges as a universal constant through time and space. However, how universalistic is Social Requisites of Democracy cross time and space? Can we imagine or theorize the genesis of the democratic self-restraint in alternative sources? The following research design is an attempt to apply the well-known theory of Lipset’s Social Requisites of Democracy to the Central American context, and more specifically, to the Nicaraguan case. In recent years, scholars (such as e.g. Linz and Stepan, Przeworksi, Karl and Schmitter) have attempted to apply existing theories to previously unexamined areas of the world (most relevant to this paper is the application of South European and Latin American transitions and consolidations to the new democracies of Eastern Europe). But what is their goal? In order to gain a new insight of how applicable an existing theory is cross-nationally, Or to show that we cannot apply theories to multiple regions? The latter might indicate that there is specificity and uniqueness to a region or a theory.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 31903.
Date of creation: 29 Jun 2011
Date of revision:
political economy; political development; democratization; economic transition;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- P36 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty
- F50 - International Economics - - International Relations and International Political Economy - - - General
- O10 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
- O54 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean
- O15 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.