IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/120352.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Universal Coordination Instrument of Economic Individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Parinov, Sergey

Abstract

This study explores the micro-level of making economic decisions, focusing on processes and causal relationships using which individuals (agents) take into account each other’s activities. A central concept employed herein is the Shared Mental Model (SMM) used by participants of joint activity to collect and process information dispersed between them that is essential for their decision-making. The abilities of agents to develop SMMs is examined through three primary modes of communication – direct, indirect, and previous. Based upon these insights, the Universal Coordination Instrument (UCI) was proposed, inherent in all economic individuals. Agents utilize their UCIs via a combined individual-collective approach to accommodate each other’s activities. The UCI structure is defined as a specialized agent-based simulation model, which is an environment for agents for their information interactions and consists of “interface” and “computational” blocks. These blocks are configured for each type of joint activity of agents in solving by agents some optimization problem. The results obtained are an extension of microeconomic theory, describing how agents can redefine all conditions for maximizing their objective functions, including the content of the function itself, to best take into account each other's intentions and capabilities, as well as in response to critical disturbances. The key findings of this study are that individuals engage in two types of rational behavior that lead to two types of equilibrium in the economic system. This allows the system to operate efficiently under substantive disequilibrium. In a face of unavoidable disturbances, a rational economic order consists of restoring equilibrium in economic systems as efficiently as possible in response to disturbances. As a potential outcome, the UCI can be implemented as a computer system to facilitate the efficient re-coordination of economic activities and restore equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Parinov, Sergey, 2022. "Universal Coordination Instrument of Economic Individuals," MPRA Paper 120352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120352/1/MPRA_paper_120352.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwicz,Leonid & Reiter,Stanley, 2008. "Designing Economic Mechanisms," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521724104.
    2. Sergey Parinov, 2022. "New Approaches to the Improvement of Coordination Mechanisms," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 16(4), pages 82-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parinov, Sergey, 2023. "Fundamental socio-economic coordination process and metacoordination," MPRA Paper 118980, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Parinov, Sergey, 2023. "Socio-Economic Coordination Mechanisms Design: Conceptual Model," MPRA Paper 117282, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Raphael Koster & Jan Balaguer & Andrea Tacchetti & Ari Weinstein & Tina Zhu & Oliver Hauser & Duncan Williams & Lucy Campbell-Gillingham & Phoebe Thacker & Matthew Botvinick & Christopher Summerfield, 2022. "Human-centred mechanism design with Democratic AI," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1398-1407, October.
      • Raphael Koster & Jan Balaguer & Andrea Tacchetti & Ari Weinstein & Tina Zhu & Oliver Hauser & Duncan Williams & Lucy Campbell-Gillingham & Phoebe Thacker & Matthew Botvinick & Christopher Summerfield, 2022. "Human-centered mechanism design with Democratic AI," Papers 2201.11441, arXiv.org.
    5. Parinov, Sergey, 2024. "Универсальный Инструмент Координации [Universal Coordination Instrument]," MPRA Paper 120450, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Jorge Iván González, 2016. "Sentimientos y racionalidad en economía," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Economía, edition 1, number 75, August.
    7. Banghua Zhu & Sai Praneeth Karimireddy & Jiantao Jiao & Michael I. Jordan, 2023. "Online Learning in a Creator Economy," Papers 2305.11381, arXiv.org.
    8. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang, 2019. "Mechanism design for first-mile ridesharing based on personalized requirements part I: Theoretical analysis in generalized scenarios," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-171.
    9. Jorge Iván González, 2008. "Hurwicz y el juez de última instancia," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 10(19), pages 115-129, July-Dece.
    10. Agnieszka Lipieta, 2018. "Adjustment processes resulting in equilibrium in the private ownership economy," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 10(4), pages 305-332, December.
    11. Agnieszka Lipieta & Andrzej Malawski, 2018. "Comparative Analysis of Mechanisms of Schumpeterian Evolution," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(1), pages 7-28.
    12. Nasimeh Heydaribeni & Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2019. "Distributed Mechanism Design for Network Resource Allocation Problems," Papers 1904.01222, arXiv.org.
    13. S. P. Kovalev & P. V. Sorokoletov, 2018. "Government Control and Regulation in Health Care in Digital Economy Epoch," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 4.
    14. R. de O. Cavalcanti & P. K. Monteiro, 2016. "Enriching information to prevent bank runs," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(3), pages 477-494, August.
    15. Anne Amar-Sabbah & Pierre Batteau, 2018. "CEO Compensation: Agency Theory is Irrelevant but not the Neoclassical Game-Theoretic Framework," Working Papers halshs-01818600, HAL.
    16. Michael L. Cook, 2018. "A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Edna Tusak Loehman & Richard Kiser & Stephen J. Rassenti, 2014. "Cost Share Adjustment Processes for Cooperative Group Decisions About Shared Goods: A Design Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1085-1126, September.
    18. Banghua Zhu & Stephen Bates & Zhuoran Yang & Yixin Wang & Jiantao Jiao & Michael I. Jordan, 2022. "The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Design," Papers 2211.05732, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    19. Krzysztof Pytka & Tomasz Kuszewski, 2010. "Ocena skuteczności handlu emisjami w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 73-89.
    20. Mehran Garmehi & Morteza Analoui & Mukaddim Pathan & Rajkumar Buyya, 2015. "An economic mechanism for request routing and resource allocation in hybrid CDN–P2P networks," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 375-393, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    microeconomic theory; economic system; instability of preferences; procedural rationality; coordination equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.