IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2018id814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Control and Regulation in Health Care in Digital Economy Epoch

Author

Listed:
  • S. P. Kovalev
  • P. V. Sorokoletov

Abstract

Approaching to health care digital economy gives dramatic new opportunities for regulation. At the same time information transparency leads to civil society growth of trust. The Russian “Digital Economy†program provides considerable means until 2024. The Ministry of Health also develops the Uniform state information system of health care. Compliance of these efforts to modern scientific paradigms of digital economy and to the nowadays world trends in digital health care with the purpose to estimate correctness of the directions and approaches chosen are analysed. On the basis of the modern theory of management in the sphere of difficult social and economic systems the analysis of the best world practices compliance to features of the of digital health care applications in Russia the conclusion that outdated hierarchical principles of control and regulation need to be refused is drawn. The new conceptual model on the basis of community of autonomous network agents is offered.

Suggested Citation

  • S. P. Kovalev & P. V. Sorokoletov, 2018. "Government Control and Regulation in Health Care in Digital Economy Epoch," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:814
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-53-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/814/813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-53-62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwicz,Leonid & Reiter,Stanley, 2008. "Designing Economic Mechanisms," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521724104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lamotte, Raphaël & de Palma, André & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2017. "On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 205-227.
    2. Parinov, Sergey, 2023. "Конструирование Механизмов Социально-Экономической Координации. Концептуальная Модель [Conceptual Model of the Socio-Economic Coordination Mechanisms Design]," MPRA Paper 117347, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Mehran Garmehi & Morteza Analoui & Mukaddim Pathan & Rajkumar Buyya, 2015. "An economic mechanism for request routing and resource allocation in hybrid CDN–P2P networks," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 375-393, November.
    4. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Jens Lausen & Moritz Kohlhase, 2021. "Internalizing the externalities of overfunding: an agent-based model approach for analyzing the market dynamics on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1387-1430, November.
    5. Bauer, Johannes M., 2014. "Platforms, systems competition, and innovation: Reassessing the foundations of communications policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 662-673.
    6. Çağıl Koçyiğit & Halil I. Bayrak & Mustafa Ç. Pınar, 2018. "Robust auction design under multiple priors by linear and integer programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 233-253, January.
    7. Dirk Helbing, 2013. "Economics 2.0: The Natural Step towards A Self-Regulating, Participatory Market Society," Papers 1305.4078, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    8. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Andrea Mantovi, 2014. "On Luxury and Equilibrium," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 6(2), pages 87-118, December.
    10. Parinov, Sergey, 2023. "Socio-Economic Coordination Mechanisms Design: Conceptual Model," MPRA Paper 117282, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Nasimeh Heydaribeni & Achilleas Anastasopoulos, 2019. "Distributed Mechanism Design for Network Resource Allocation Problems," Papers 1904.01222, arXiv.org.
    12. Agnieszka Lipieta & Ilona Ćwięczek, 2022. "Mechanisms leading to equilibrium in economy with financial market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4166-4182, October.
    13. Parinov, Sergey, 2023. "Fundamental socio-economic coordination process and metacoordination," MPRA Paper 118980, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Shih-Tang Su & Vijay G. Subramanian, 2022. "Order of Commitments in Bayesian Persuasion with Partial-informed Senders," Papers 2202.06479, arXiv.org.
    15. R. de O. Cavalcanti & P. K. Monteiro, 2016. "Enriching information to prevent bank runs," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(3), pages 477-494, August.
    16. A. Mantovi, 2013. "On the geometry of luxury," Economics Department Working Papers 2013-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    17. Lihua Yang, 2018. "Collaborative knowledge-driven governance: Types and mechanisms of collaboration between science, social science, and local knowledge," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 53-73.
    18. Michael Moutoussis & Raymond J Dolan & Peter Dayan, 2016. "How People Use Social Information to Find out What to Want in the Paradigmatic Case of Inter-temporal Preferences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Babaioff, Moshe & Blumrosen, Liad & Schapira, Michael, 2013. "The communication burden of payment determination," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 153-167.
    20. Jorge Iván González, 2008. "Hurwicz y el juez de última instancia," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 10(19), pages 115-129, July-Dece.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2018:id:814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Рнтонова Ð•Ð²Ð³ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð’Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð¸Ð¼Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð½Ð° (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.