IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/113550.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Влияние Интернета И Цифровой Экономики На Развитие Конкуренции: Что Мы Можем Сказать О Сербии
[Impact of the Internet and Digital Economy on Development of Competition: What We Can Say about Serbia]

Author

Listed:
  • Bukvić, Rajko

Abstract

Russian Abstract: С ростом применения ИКТ технологий и развитием цифровой экономики в конце прошлого и начале нового столетия вопросы конкуренции, её природы и роли в экономике появились в новом свете и с новой силой. Исходя из положений известной теории пяти сил Майкла Портера многие ожидали, что применение интернета приведёт к росту конкуренции, оказав огромное воздействие как на стороне предложения, так особенно на стороне спроса. Некоторые исследования казалось бы подтверждали такие надежды. Но, другие эмпирические данные и соответствующие исследования показали, что это не совсем так, и что подтверждается альтернативная теория «Победитель забирает всё», согласно которой конкуренция развивается в направлении монополистической конкуренции. Ситуация в Сербии, оказавшейся в некоторых исследованиях в группе стран зарождающихся лидеров в области ИКТ, пока не ясна. Основы использования ИКТ уже положены, но электронный бизнес пока не столь развит. Эмпирических исследований влияния интернета и ИКТ на конкуренцию нет, но быстрое развитие этих отраслей внушает, что конкуренция пока достаточно сильна. Это особенно можно сказать про самый сектор ИКТ, который является самой быстро развивающейся отрасли в сербской экономике. English Abstract: On the ground of the use of ICT technology and the digital economy development at the end of past and beginning of new century the competition issues, its nature and role in the economy appeared in new light and with new power. Many people expected, based on the famous Porter’s theory of five forces, the competition has to grow through the internet use, with huge impact on the supply as well the demand. Some researches seemed to claim these expectations. But, other empirical evidence and appropriated researches shown that there it is no such. They have shown that the alternative theory was claimed. According this theory “Winner-takes-all” the competition development leads to monopolistic competition. Situation in Serbia, which in some researches was named emerged leader in the ICT area, is unclear still. Bases of the ICT use are placed, but electronic business is not yet so developed. There is the lack of empirical researches of the impact of internet and ICT on the competition, but fast development of such branches suggests that competition is strong. This can be say especially for ICT sector, which is the branch with fastest development in Serbian economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukvić, Rajko, 2022. "Влияние Интернета И Цифровой Экономики На Развитие Конкуренции: Что Мы Можем Сказать О Сербии [Impact of the Internet and Digital Economy on Development of Competition: What We Can Say about Serbia," MPRA Paper 113550, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2022.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:113550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/113550/1/MPRA_paper_113550.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Noe & Geoffrey Parker, 2005. "Winner Take All: Competition, Strategy, and the Structure of Returns in the Internet Economy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 141-164, March.
    2. John Quiggin, 2014. "National accounting and the digital economyy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 136-142.
    3. Jeffrey R. Brown & Austan Goolsbee, 2002. "Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(3), pages 481-507, June.
    4. Rosen, Sherwin, 1981. "The Economics of Superstars," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(5), pages 845-858, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bukvić, Rajko, 2022. "Пет сила vs Дуги реп [Five Forces vs Long Tail]," MPRA Paper 114557, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hoskins, Jake D., 2020. "The evolving role of hit and niche products in brick-and-mortar retail category assortment planning: A large-scale empirical investigation of U.S. consumer packaged goods," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Meir Russ, 2017. "The Trifurcation of the Labor Markets in the Networked, Knowledge-Driven, Global Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 672-703, June.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Michael D. Smith, 2010. "Research Commentary --- Long Tails vs. Superstars: The Effect of Information Technology on Product Variety and Sales Concentration Patterns," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 736-747, December.
    5. Leye Li & Louise Yi Lu & Dongyue Wang, 2022. "External labour market competitions and stock price crash risk: evidence from exposures to competitor CEOs’ award‐winning events," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1421-1460, April.
    6. Sudip Datta & Mai Iskandar-Datta, 2014. "Upper-echelon executive human capital and compensation: Generalist vs specialist skills," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1853-1866, December.
    7. Luis Garicano & Thomas N. Hubbard, 2016. "The Returns to Knowledge Hierarchies," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(4), pages 653-684.
    8. Katsiaryna Bardos & Steven E. Kozlowski & Michael R. Puleo, 2021. "Entrenchment or efficiency? CEO‐to‐employee pay ratio and the cost of debt," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(3), pages 511-533, August.
    9. Edgardo Arturo Ayala Gaytán, 2009. "Social network externalities and price dispersion in online markets," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 1-28, November.
    10. Till Treeck, 2014. "Did Inequality Cause The U.S. Financial Crisis?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 421-448, July.
    11. Bryson, Alex & Chevalier, Arnaud, 2015. "Is there a taste for racial discrimination amongst employers?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 51-63.
    12. Gaspar, Jess & Glaeser, Edward L., 1998. "Information Technology and the Future of Cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 136-156, January.
    13. Francisco Alcalá & Miguel González‐Maestre, 2012. "Artistic Creation and Intellectual Property: A Professional Career Approach," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 633-672, September.
    14. Volker Nocke, 2006. "A Gap for Me: Entrepreneurs and Entry," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(5), pages 929-956, September.
    15. Luis Medrano-Adán & Vicente Salas-Fumás & J. Sanchez-Asin, 2015. "Heterogeneous entrepreneurs from occupational choices in economies with minimum wages," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 597-619, March.
    16. Weeds, Helen, 2012. "Superstars and the long tail: The impact of technology on market structure in media industries," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 60-68.
    17. Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School.
      • Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    18. Roland Bénabou & Jean Tirole, 2016. "Bonus Culture: Competitive Pay, Screening, and Multitasking," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(2), pages 305-370.
    19. Gaenssle Sophia & Budzinski Oliver & Astakhova Daria, 2018. "Conquering the Box Office: Factors Influencing Success of International Movies in Russia," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 245-266, December.
    20. Vincenzo Carrieri & Francesco Principe & Michele Raitano, 2018. "What makes you ‘super-rich’? New evidence from an analysis of football players’ wages," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 70(4), pages 950-973.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    цифровая экономика; интернет; конкуренция; концепция пяти сил; теория «Победитель забирает всё»; ИКТ; Сербия; digital economy; internet; competition; five forces conception; theory “winner-takes-all”; ICT; Serbia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:113550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.