This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Effects of EMU on Structural Reforms in Labour and Product Markets

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Romain Duval
Jørgen Elmeskov ()

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Structural reforms in labour and product markets are required in a number of euro-area countries. A question in this regard, which is the topic of this paper, is whether belonging to the euro area tends to help or hinder structural reform. The paper first reviews the theoretical arguments and the existing empirical literature – in both cases finding conclusions that point in opposite directions. Next, the paper uses an OECD database on labour market reform developed recently and an update of OECD indicators of product market regulation to compare progress in labour and product market reform over the decade since 1993 between euro-area countries and other OECD countries. Overall, euro-area countries appear to have made relatively good progress in structural reform but it is much less clear from the descriptive evidence whether progress can be ascribed to membership of Economic and Monetary Union. To explore further the role of monetary regime for structural reform, the paper undertakes an econometric examination of the likelihood that countries undertake reform in five specific areas of labour and product market policies. Based on pooled cross-country/time series Probit regressions covering 21 countries and the period 1985-2003, it is found that structural reform is strengthened by high unemployment, crisis as reflected in a large output gap, healthy public finances, reforms in other policy fields and small country size. Further, countries that pursue fixed exchange-rate regimes or participate in monetary union, and therefore have little or no monetary autonomy, appear to undertake less structural reform – with the effect possibly being concentrated on large countries.

Les effets de l’UEM sur la mise en œuvre des réformes structurelles sur les marchés du travail et des biens
Des réformes structurelles sur les marchés du travail et des biens s’avèrent nécessaires dans un certain nombre de pays de la zone euro. Une question à ce propos, qui constitue le sujet de cet article, est de savoir si l’appartenance à la zone euro tend à favoriser ou à freiner la mise en oeuvre de réformes structurelles. L’article passe tout d’abord en revue les arguments théoriques et la littérature empirique – qui dans les deux cas aboutissent à des conclusions contradictoires. L’article utilise ensuite une base de données OCDE sur les réformes des marchés du travail développée récemment, ainsi qu’une actualisation des indicateurs OCDE de réglementation des marchés des biens, afin de comparer les progrès en matière de réformes des marchés du travail et des biens au cours de la décennie écoulée depuis 1993 entre les pays de la zone euro et les autres pays de l’OCDE. Dans l’ensemble, il apparaît que les pays de la zone euro ont relativement bien progressé en matière de réformes structurelles, mais il est beaucoup moins évident au vu de l’analyse descriptive que ces progrès peuvent être attribués à l’appartenance à l’Union Économique et Monétaire. Afin d’explorer plus avant le rôle du régime monétaire dans la mise en œuvre de réformes structurelles, l’article effectue une analyse économétrique de la probabilité que les pays entreprennent des réformes dans cinq types de politiques relatives aux marchés du travail et des biens. Sur la base de régressions de type Probit sur données de panel couvrant 21 pays au cours de la période 1985-2003, il ressort que la mise en œuvre de réformes structurelles est renforcée par un chômage élevé, une crise économique telle que mesurée par un écart de production élevé, une situation saine des finances publiques, l’existence de réformes dans d’autres domaines et la faible taille du pays considéré. En outre, les pays participant à un régime de changes fixes ou à une union monétaire, et qui par conséquent disposent d’une autonomie limitée voire inexistante de leur politique monétaire, apparaissent entreprendre moins de réformes structurelles – cet effet étant potentiellement plus marqué dans le cas des grands pays.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sourceoecd.org/10.1787/830757326248
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by OECD Economics Department in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 438.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 25 Jul 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:438-en

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Email:
Web page: http://www.oecd.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: labour markets marché du travail euro Euro Economic and Monetary Union Union économique et monétaire product markets political economy économie politique reforms marchés des biens réformes

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
O52 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Ignazio Angeloni & Anil K. Kashyap & Benoit Mojon & Daniele Terlizzese, 2003. "The Output Composition Puzzle: A Difference in the Monetary Transmission Mechanism in the Euro Area and U.S," NBER Working Papers 9985, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Alberto Alesina & Edward L. Glaeser & Bruce Sacerdote, 2005. "Work and Leisure in the U.S. and Europe: Why So Different?," NBER Working Papers 11278, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Mike Kennedy & Torsten Sløk, 2005. "Structural Policy Reforms and External Imbalances," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 415, OECD Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  4. Boeri, Tito & Nicoletti, Giuseppe & Scarpetta, Stefano, 2000. "Regulation And Labour Market Performance," CEPR Discussion Papers 2420, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Belot, M.V.K. & Ours, J. C. van, 2000. "Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labour market reforms?," Discussion Paper 40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Adriana Kugler & Giovanni Pica, 2003. "Effects of Employment Protection and Product Market Regulations on the Italian Labor Market," Economics Working Papers 722, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. Monique Ebell & Christian Haefke, 2002. "Product Market Deregulation and Labor Market Outcomes," Economics Working Papers 726, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Dec 2003. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  8. Pietro Catte & Nathalie Girouard & Robert Price & Christophe André, 2004. "Housing Markets, Wealth and the Business Cycle," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 394, OECD Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  9. Giuseppe Nicoletti & Steve Golub & Dana Hajkova & Daniel Mirza & Kwang-Yeol Yoo, 2003. "Policies and International Integration: Influences on Trade and Foreign Direct Investment," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 359, OECD Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  10. Luiz de Mello & Per Mathis Kongsrud & Robert Price, 2004. "Saving Behaviour and the Effectiveness of Fiscal Policy," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 397, OECD Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  11. repec:fth:prinin:390 is not listed on IDEAS
  12. Alan Krueger & Jorn-Steffen Pischke, 1997. "Observations and Conjectures on the U.S. Employment Miracle," Working Papers 769, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  13. Ignazio Angeloni & Anil K. Kashyap & Benoît Mojon & Daniele Terlizzese, 2003. "The output composition puzzle - a difference in the monetary transmission mechanism in the euro area and the US," Working Paper Series 268, European Central Bank. [Downloadable!]
  14. Coe, David T & Snower, Dennis J., 1997. "Policy Complementarities: The Case for Fundamental Labour Market Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 1585, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  15. Blanchard, Olivier J & Giavazzi, Francesco, 2001. "Macroeconomic Effects of Regulation and Deregulation in Goods and Labour Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 2713, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  16. Levy-Yeyati, Eduardo & Sturzenegger, Federico, 2005. "Classifying exchange rate regimes: Deeds vs. words," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1603-1635, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  17. Nicola Brandt & Jean-Marc Burniaux & Romain Duval, 2005. "Assessing the OECD Jobs Strategy: Past Developments and Reforms," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 429, OECD Economics Department. [Downloadable!]
  18. Landers, Renee M & Rebitzer, James B & Taylor, Lowell J, 1996. "Rat Race Redux: Adverse Selection in the Determination of Work Hours in Law Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 329-48, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2007. "How to deal with economic divergences in EMU?," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2007-14, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE). [Downloadable!]
  2. Ansgar Belke & Daniel Gros, 2007. "Instability of the Eurozone? On Monetary Policy, House Prices and Labor Market Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 2547, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
  3. Adam S. Posen & Daniel Popov Gould, 2006. "Has EMU Had Any Impact on the Degree of Wage Restraint?," Peterson Institute Working Paper Series WP06-06, Peterson Institute for International Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Wim Suyker, 2006. "Nuancing the favourable assessments of the Nordic economies," CPB Memoranda 153, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. [Downloadable!]
  5. Giuseppe Fiori & Giuseppe Nicoletti & Stefano Scarpetta & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2007. "Employment Outcomes and the Interaction Between Product and Labor Market Deregulation: Are They Substitutes or Complements?," IZA Discussion Papers 2770, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Gavin Cameron & Nicholas Fawcett, 2005. "Economic Policies for Growth and Employment," Economics Series Working Papers 249, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  7. Ansgar Belke & Bernhard Herz & Lukas Vogel, 2006. "Are Monetary Rules and Reforms Complements or Substitutes? A Panel Analysis for the World versus OECD Countries," Working Papers 129, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank). [Downloadable!]
  8. Buti, Marco & Röger, Werner & Turrini, Alessandro Antonio, 2007. "Is Lisbon far from Maastricht? Trade-offs and Complementarities between Fiscal Discipline and Structural Reforms," CEPR Discussion Papers 6204, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Philip R. Lane, 2006. "The Real Effects of EMU," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp115, IIIS. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. Ansgar Belke & Bernhard Herz & Lukas Vogel, 2005. "Structural Reforms and the Exchange Rate Regime A Panel Analysis for the World versus OECD Countries," Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim 263/2005, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Eloi Laurent & Jacques Le Cacheux, 2007. "What (Economic) Constitution does the EU need?," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2007-04, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.