Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Fiscal Consolidation Across Government Levels - Part 2. Fiscal Rules for Sub-central Governments, Update of the Institutional Indicator

Contents:

Author Info

  • Kaja Fredriksen
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Fiscal rules that constrain sub-central government (SCG) budgeting are very common across the OECD, but there are substantial cross-country differences in their implementation and impact. This paper presents the 2011 update of the fiscal rules database established in 2005. As in 2005, budget balance objectives are the most common form of rule along with borrowing constraints, while limits on SCG expenditure are rare. Because of trade-offs between objectives that fiscal rules must cater to, cross-country variation in the value of the composite indicator is low. There is, however, much more variation in country scores for the individual objectives of fiscal rules. Despite the increased focus on sustainability in public finances over recent years, indicator values have changed little since 2005 except for a few countries. This suggests that the sub-central fiscal rules framework was in place well before the recent crisis struck. Assainissement budgétaire aux différents niveaux d'administration - Partie 2. Les règles budgétaires s'appliquant aux collectivités territoriales : mise à jour de l'indicateur institutionnel Les règles budgétaires encadrant l’établissement des budgets des administrations infranationales sont très courantes dans la zone de l’OCDE, mais leur mise en oeuvre et leur impact diffèrent grandement selon les pays. Le présent rapport expose la mise à jour 2012 de la base de données sur les règles budgétaires établie en 2005. En 2005, les règles les plus couramment utilisées sont les obligations d’équilibre budgétaire et la limitation des emprunts, tandis que la limitation des dépenses des collectivités locales est rare. En raison d’arbitrages entre les différents objectifs des règles budgétaires, la valeur de l’indicateur composite varie peu d’un pays à l’autre. Les écarts sont toutefois beaucoup plus marqués dans les notes nationales attribuées aux différents objectifs des règles budgétaires. Malgré l’importance accrue accordée, ces dernières années, à la viabilité des finances publiques, les valeurs de l’indicateur ne varient guère depuis 2005, excepté pour un petit nombre de pays. Cela donne à penser que le cadre de règles budgétaires applicable aux collectivités territoriales était en place bien avant la récente crise.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxqzhkr1-en
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 1071.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 28 Jun 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1071-en

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.oecd.org
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: budget systems; fiscal federalism; fiscal rules; fédéralisme budgétaire; système budgétaire; règles budgétaires;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Douglas Sutherland & Robert Price & Isabelle Joumard, 2005. "Sub-central government fiscal rules," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2005(2), pages 141-181.
    2. Douglas Sutherland & Peter Hoeller & Rossana Merola, 2012. "Fiscal Consolidation: Part 1. How Much is Needed and How to Reduce Debt to a Prudent Level?," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 932, OECD Publishing.
    3. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64, pages 416.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1071-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.