IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ctpaab/16-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 3: Decentralisation, Infrastructure Investment and Educational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Kaja Fredriksen

    (OECD)

Abstract

Theories of fiscal competition between jurisdictions suggest that investment in productive relative to consumptive spending is higher in a decentralised setting, and that efficiency of the public sector is also higher. This paper empirically analyses the link between decentralisation and the composition of public spending as well as the relation between decentralisation and educational performance. The results suggest that fiscal decentralisation increases the share of public funds directed to capital spending and that the bulk of this shift is due to higher education spending. Using an education production function approach and PISA results (Programme of International Student Assessment) as an indicator of educational output, the results suggest that educational performance is significantly higher in decentralised countries, even when controlling for spending and other variables affecting education. A 10% point increase in decentralisation increases educational performance by four PISA points, thereby improving the PISA ranking by around four country positions on average. Decentralisation to lower government levels and decentralisation to the school level (school autonomy) have a similar impact on educational performance. Décentralisation et croissance économique: Partie 3 : Décentralisation, investissement en infrastructure et performance des établissements scolaires Les théories de la concurrence budgétaire entre les pays et les entités publiques font penser que l’investissement dans les dépenses de production et non de consommation est plus élevé dans un cadre décentralisé, et que l’efficience du secteur public est supérieure également. La présente note analyse de façon empirique le lien entre décentralisation et performances des établissements scolaires. Les résultats font penser que la décentralisation budgétaire augmente la part de fonds publics axée sur les dépenses en capital, et que l’essentiel de cette évolution est dû à des dépenses dans l’éducation plus élevées. Utilisant une approche de fonction de production dans le domaine de l’éducation ainsi que les résultats du PISA (Programme d’évaluation du suivi des acquis des élèves), comme indicateurs des performances des établissements scolaires, les résultats tendent à montrer que les performances des écoles sont nettement supérieures dans les pays décentralisés, même après prise en compte des dépenses et d’autres variables influant sur l’éducation. La décentralisation à des niveaux infra-gouvernementaux et la décentralisation au niveau des écoles (autonomie des établissements scolaires) ont un impact analogue sur les performances des établissements scolaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaja Fredriksen, 2013. "Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 3: Decentralisation, Infrastructure Investment and Educational Performance," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 16, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ctpaab:16-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k4559gg7wlw-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4559gg7wlw-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k4559gg7wlw-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stossberg Sibylle & Blöchliger Hansjörg, 2017. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 237(3), pages 225-273, June.
    2. Krzysztof Kluza, 2015. "Debt Repayment Capacity Of Local Government Sector In Poland During The 2008-2013 Economic Slowdown Period," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 17-27.
    3. International Monetary Fund, 2015. "Romania: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2015/080, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Floriana Cerniglia - Riccarda Longaretti - Alessandra Michelangeli, 2017. "Decentralization of public expenditure and growth in Italy: Does the composition matter?," CRANEC - Working Papers del Centro di Ricerche in Analisi economica e sviluppo economico internazionale crn1704, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Centro di Ricerche in Analisi economica e sviluppo economico internazionale (CRANEC).
    5. Brosio, Giorgio, 2014. "Decentralization and Public Service Delivery in Asia," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 389, Asian Development Bank.
    6. Andrea Filippetti & Agnese Sacchi, 2016. "Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1793-1824, December.
    7. Kaja Fredriksen, 2013. "Fiscal Consolidation Across Government Levels - Part 2. Fiscal Rules for Sub-central Governments, Update of the Institutional Indicator," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1071, OECD Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    décentralisation budgétaire; décentralisation de l’éducation; education decentralisation; fiscal decentralisation; fiscal federalism; fédéralisme budgétaire; investissement public; PISA; PISA; public investment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ctpaab:16-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ctoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.