IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/acttax/v7y2015i2p17-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debt Repayment Capacity Of Local Government Sector In Poland During The 2008-2013 Economic Slowdown Period

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Kluza

Abstract

The crisis, which began in 2008, had a negative impact on the financial condition of local governments across the European Union. In Poland, the debt of the local government sector increased from 2.3% of GDP in 2008 to 4.2% of GDP in 2013. The growing indebtedness influenced the scope of countercyclical policies of local governments. At present, such policies appear as hardly sustainable in the context of future debt repayments and the required deleveraging process. The paper shows simulations concerning the ability of local governments to service their accumulated debt. In a moderately optimistic scenario when there is no new borrowing, over 25% of local governments will need more than 15 years to repay their existing debts. Although in 2013 the financial indicators showed sufficient space for debt servicing for 95% of local governments, the sector remains highly vulnerable to future adverse scenarios. The use of random sampling computational algorithms (Monte Carlo method) applied to the local government financial ratios based on free operating cash flow and net debt confirms the sector’s negative credit risk exposure. Even modestly adverse scenarios show that ca. 20 percent of local governments will reach alarmingly low levels of their debt service indicators in the near future. The larger municipalities appear to be the local government subcategory with the highest credit risk exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Kluza, 2015. "Debt Repayment Capacity Of Local Government Sector In Poland During The 2008-2013 Economic Slowdown Period," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 17-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:17-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/acttax/at-v7n2-2015/AT-V7N2-2015-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie Peck, 2014. "Editor's choice Pushing austerity: state failure, municipal bankruptcy and the crises of fiscal federalism in the USA," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 17-44.
    2. Kaja Fredriksen, 2013. "Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 3: Decentralisation, Infrastructure Investment and Educational Performance," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 16, OECD Publishing.
    3. Gauti B. Eggertsson & Paul Krugman, 2012. "Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(3), pages 1469-1513.
    4. Hansjörg Blöchliger, 2013. "Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 1: How Fiscal Federalism Affects Long-Term Development," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 14, OECD Publishing.
    5. Hansjörg Blöchliger & Balázs Égert, 2013. "Decentralisation and Economic Growth - Part 2: The Impact on Economic Activity, Productivity and Investment," OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism 15, OECD Publishing.
    6. Chin-Piao Yeh & Ai-Chi Hsu & Wei-Hsien & Kuang-Cheng Chai, 2014. "Neural Network Forecasts of Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance Expenditires," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(5), pages 95-114.
    7. Betsy Donald & Amy Glasmeier & Mia Gray & Linda Lobao, 2014. "Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 3-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Filippetti & Agnese Sacchi, 2016. "Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1793-1824, December.
    2. Dan Cohen, 2021. "Philanthropy to the rescue? Detroit’s schools and urban policymaking under austerity," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(7), pages 1547-1566, November.
    3. Krzysztof Kluza, 2017. "Risk assessment of the local government sector based on the ratio analysis and the DEA method. Evidence from Poland," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(3), pages 329-351, December.
    4. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2015. "Understanding employment growth in the recession: the geographic diversity of state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 359-377.
    5. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    6. Alessia Arcidiacono & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2022. "Decentralisation and Resilience: A Multidimensional Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2022. "Crowding Out Development: Fiscal Federalism after the Great Recession," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 311-329, March.
    8. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    9. Irena Szarowská, 2014. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Development in Selected Unitary European Countries," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 22-40.
    10. Mark Davidson, 2020. "Extreme municipal fiscal stress and austerity? A case study of fiscal reform after Chapter 9 bankruptcy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 522-538, May.
    11. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 4-30, January.
    12. Athanasios Geromichalos & Lucas Herrenbrueck, 2022. "The Liquidity-Augmented Model of Macroeconomic Aggregates: A New Monetarist DSGE Approach," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 134-167, July.
    13. Daisuke Ikeda & Toan Phan & Timothy Sablik, 2020. "Asset Bubbles and Global Imbalances," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 20, pages 1-4, January.
    14. Bing Tong & Guang Yang, 2020. "A Fixed-Interest-Rate New Keynesian Model of China," CFDS Discussion Paper Series 2020/1, Center for Financial Development and Stability at Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
    15. George-Marios Angeletos & Chen Lian, 2018. "Forward Guidance without Common Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(9), pages 2477-2512, September.
    16. Hayo, Bernd & Neumeier, Florian, 2017. "The (In)validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem–findings from a representative German population survey," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 162-174.
    17. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2019. "Monetary Policy and Wealth Inequalities in Great Britain: Assessing the role of unconventional policies for a decade of household data," Papers 1912.09702, arXiv.org.
    18. Matthew Rognlie & Andrei Shleifer & Alp Simsek, 2018. "Investment Hangover and the Great Recession," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 113-153, April.
    19. Romei, Federica & de Ferra, Sergio, 2018. "Sovereign Default in a Monetary Union," CEPR Discussion Papers 12976, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Michalis Nikiforos, 2020. "Demand, Distribution, Productivity, Structural Change, and (Secular?) Stagnation," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_945, Levy Economics Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Local Governments; Local Government Risk; Debt Repayment Capacity; Monte Carlo Method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H74 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Borrowing
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:7:y:2015:i:2:p:17-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.