Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Biological versus foster children education : the old-age support motive as a catch-up determinant ? Some evidence from Indonesia

Contents:

Author Info

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper aims at explaining differences in education among foster-children and between foster and biological children in developing countries. Foster-children whose biological parents are alive may provide old-age support for both their host and biological parents. Therefore foster-children have lower returns to education than biological children and should receive less human capital investment in household where both types of children live together. However, in households where foster-children are alone, host parents will over-invest in their education to ensure that the expected old-age support will equal a minimum amount to survive. Using data from Indonesia, we provide some evidence supporting our hypothesis.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: ftp://mse.univ-paris1.fr/pub/mse/CES2008/V08042.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne in its series Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne with number v08042.

    as in new window
    Length: 26 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:v08042

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 106-112 boulevard de l'Hôpital 75 647 PARIS CEDEX 13
    Phone: + 33 44 07 81 00
    Fax: + 33 1 44 07 83 01
    Web page: http://centredeconomiesorbonne.univ-paris1.fr/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Household structure; child fostering; sibling rivalry.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:v08042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lucie Label).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.