This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Composite Competitiveness Indicators With Endogenous Versus Predetermined Weights : An Application to the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Harry P. Bowen () (McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte)
Wim Moesen () (Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University Leuven)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper addresses an important methodological issue concerning the construction of a composite indicator, and in particular composite indicators of national competitiveness; these indicators often serve as a benchmark for policymakers and others to judge the relative success of their country. Most competitiveness indicators aggregate primitive data using predetermined fixed weight values that are applied uniformly to all countries. The use of fixed and uniform weights may bias inferences of relative performance since it ignores that countries can have different policy priorities or lack inherent capabilities on some dimensions. In addition, since the particular weight values chosen are not likely to be universally accepted, the credibility of any particular index is weakened. To address this issue, this paper proposes a procedure that allows for endogenously determined country specific weights that explicitly take account of a country’s own choices and achievement across primitive dimensions. We then illustrate our procedure by applying it to examine the widely cited Global Competitiveness Index developed by the World Economic Forum. Our resulting Revealed Competitiveness Index uses weights that allow that countries may choose different combinations of the underlying dimensions but still achieve the same level of overall performance. In general, our method will prove useful to those wishing to construct and compare indexes of performance, while minimizing objections about the “importance” of the different component dimensions that often arise when predetermined and uniformly applied weights are used.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: ftp://ftp.drivehq.com/msbftp/repec/pdfs/wpapers/msbwp2009-02.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Failed to list directory /msbftp/repec/pdfs/wpapers. If this is indeed the case, please notify (HP Bowen)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte in its series Discussion Paper Series with number 2009-02.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:msb:wpaper:2009-02

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mccoll.queens.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (HP Bowen).

Related research
Keywords: Competitiveness Rankings; Composite Indicators; Aggregation; National Competitiveness; World Economic Forum;

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Laurens Cherchye & Wim Moesen & Tom Puyenbroeck, 2004. "Legitimately Diverse, yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(5), pages 919-955, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-12.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.