IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mit/sloanp/1991.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Katz, Ralph.
  • Allen, Thomas J. 1931-

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Katz, Ralph. & Allen, Thomas J. 1931-, 1983. "Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix," Working papers 1233-83R., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:mit:sloanp:1991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1991
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Knight, 1976. "Matrix Organization: A Review," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 111-130, May.
    2. Cleland, David I., 1968. "The deliberate conflict," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 78-80, February.
    3. Mansfield, Edwin & Wagner, Samuel, 1975. "Organizational and Strategic Factors Associated with Probabilities of Success in Industrial R & D," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 179-198, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Bolli & Martin Woerter, 2013. "Technological Diversification and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-336, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    2. Florian Kellner & Bernhard Lienland & Sebastian Utz, 2021. "A multi‐criteria decision‐making approach for assembling optimal powertrain technology portfolios in low GHG emission environments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1412-1429, December.
    3. Becker, Annette & Hottenrott, Hanna & Mukherjee, Anwesha, 2022. "Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-23.
    4. Daniel A. Levinthal & Maciej Workiewicz, 2018. "When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 207-224, April.
    5. James Boles & Albert N. Link, 2017. "On the R&D/marketing interface in knowledge intensive entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 943-952, September.
    6. Verworn, Birgit, 2002. "The "fuzzy front end" of product development: An exploratory study," Working Papers 15, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    7. Gicheva, Dora & Link, Albert N., 2016. "On the economic performance of nascent entrepreneurs," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 109-117.
    8. Elizabeth Webster & Paul H. Jensen, 2009. "Macroeconomic Conditions and Successful Commercialization," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2009n09, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    9. Gharbi, Sami & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Teulon, Frédéric, 2014. "R&D investments and high-tech firms' stock return volatility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 306-312.
    10. Thomas Bolli & Ursula Renold & Martin Wörter, 2018. "Vertical educational diversity and innovation performance," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-131, February.
    11. Rajdeep Grewal & Gary L. Lilien & Girish Mallapragada, 2006. "Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1043-1056, July.
    12. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Davies, Andrew & Brady, Tim, 2000. "Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 931-953, August.
    14. Richard Torbett & Ammon J Salter & David M Gann & Mike Hobday, 2001. "Design Performance Measurement in the Construction Sector: A Pilot Study," SPRU Working Paper Series 66, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Elizabeth Webster & Paul H. Jensen, 2011. "Do Patents Matter for Commercialization?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(2), pages 431-453.
    16. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Krzysztof Gos, 2015. "The Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Matrix Organizational Structures (Kluczowe zalety i ograniczenia macierzowych struktur organizacyjnych)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(19), pages 66-83.
    18. José Allouche & Isabelle Huault, 1998. "Contrôle, coordination et régulation:les nouvelles formes organisationnelles," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 1(2), pages 5-31, June.
    19. Joachim Henkel & Eric von Hippel, 2005. "Welfare Implications of User Innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 30(2_2), pages 73-87, January.
    20. Jasinska-Biliczak Anna, 2020. "Endogenous Innovation Potential: Regional SMEs’ Perspective in Emerging Economies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 435-449.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mit:sloanp:1991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: None (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssmitus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.